Literature DB >> 31795662

Effects of rate and age in processing interaural time and level differences in normal-hearing and bilateral cochlear-implant listeners.

Sean R Anderson1, Kyle Easter2, Matthew J Goupell2.   

Abstract

Bilateral cochlear implants (BICIs) provide improved sound localization and speech understanding in noise compared to unilateral CIs. However, normal-hearing (NH) listeners demonstrate superior binaural processing abilities compared to BICI listeners. This investigation sought to understand differences between NH and BICI listeners' processing of interaural time differences (ITDs) and interaural level differences (ILDs) as a function of fine-structure and envelope rate using an intracranial lateralization task. The NH listeners were presented band-limited acoustical pulse trains and sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones using headphones, and the BICI listeners were presented single-electrode electrical pulse trains using direct stimulation. Lateralization range increased as fine-structure rate increased for ILDs in BICI listeners. Lateralization range decreased for rates above 100 Hz for fine-structure ITDs, but decreased for rates lower or higher than 100 Hz for envelope ITDs in both groups. Lateralization ranges for ITDs were smaller for BICI listeners on average. After controlling for age, older listeners showed smaller lateralization ranges and BICI listeners had a more rapid decline for ITD sensitivity at 300 pulses per second. This work suggests that age confounds comparisons between NH and BICI listeners in temporal processing tasks and that some NH-BICI binaural processing differences persist even when age differences are adequately addressed.

Year:  2019        PMID: 31795662      PMCID: PMC6948219          DOI: 10.1121/1.5130384

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  107 in total

1.  Loudness growth in cochlear implants: effect of stimulation rate and electrode configuration.

Authors:  Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Effects of interaural time differences in fine structure and envelope on lateral discrimination in electric hearing.

Authors:  Piotr Majdak; Bernhard Laback; Wolf-Dieter Baumgartner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The effect of overall level on sensitivity to interaural differences of time and level at high frequencies.

Authors:  Mathias Dietz; Leslie R Bernstein; Constantine Trahiotis; Stephan D Ewert; Volker Hohmann
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Sensitivity of bilateral cochlear implant users to fine-structure and envelope interaural time differences.

Authors:  Victor A Noel; Donald K Eddington
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Processing of temporal fine structure as a function of age.

Authors:  John H Grose; Sara K Mamo
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Sensitivity to Interaural Time Differences Conveyed in the Stimulus Envelope: Estimating Inputs of Binaural Neurons Through the Temporal Analysis of Spike Trains.

Authors:  Mathias Dietz; Le Wang; David Greenberg; David McAlpine
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-06-13

7.  Envelope coding in the lateral superior olive. I. Sensitivity to interaural time differences.

Authors:  P X Joris; T C Yin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Calculating correlation coefficients with repeated observations: Part 1--Correlation within subjects.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-02-18

9.  Worldwide trends in bilateral cochlear implantation.

Authors:  B Robert Peters; Josephine Wyss; Manuel Manrique
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  Lateralization of Interaural Level Differences with Multiple Electrode Stimulation in Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Listeners.

Authors:  Olga A Stakhovskaya; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  7 in total

1.  Neural Adaptation of the Electrically Stimulated Auditory Nerve Is Not Affected by Advanced Age in Postlingually Deafened, Middle-aged, and Elderly Adult Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Shuman He; Jeffrey Skidmore; Sara Conroy; William J Riggs; Brittney L Carter; Ruili Xie
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 3.562

2.  Evaluating the Impact of Age, Acoustic Exposure, and Electrical Stimulation on Binaural Sensitivity in Adult Bilateral Cochlear Implant Patients.

Authors:  Tanvi Thakkar; Sean R Anderson; Alan Kan; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2020-06-26

3.  Reweighting of Binaural Localization Cues in Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Listeners.

Authors:  Maike Klingel; Bernhard Laback
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-11-23

4.  Intracranial lateralization bias observed in the presence of symmetrical hearing thresholds.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Virginia Best; H Steven Colburn
Journal:  JASA Express Lett       Date:  2021-10-15

5.  Sound source localization patterns and bilateral cochlear implants: Age at onset of deafness effects.

Authors:  Sean R Anderson; Rachael Jocewicz; Alan Kan; Jun Zhu; ShengLi Tzeng; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Age-Related Changes in Interaural-Level-Difference-Based Across-Frequency Binaural Interference.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 5.702

7.  Transmission of Binaural Cues by Bilateral Cochlear Implants: Examining the Impacts of Bilaterally Independent Spectral Peak-Picking, Pulse Timing, and Compression.

Authors:  William O Gray; Paul G Mayo; Matthew J Goupell; Andrew D Brown
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.