Literature DB >> 10687706

Effectiveness of spatial cues, prosody, and talker characteristics in selective attention.

C J Darwin1, R W Hukin.   

Abstract

The three experiments reported here compare the effectiveness of natural prosodic and vocal-tract size cues at overcoming spatial cues in selective attention. Listeners heard two simultaneous sentences and decided which of two simultaneous target words came from the attended sentence. Experiment 1 used sentences that had natural differences in pitch and in level caused by a change in the location of the main sentence stress. The sentences' pitch contours were moved apart or together in order to separate out effects due to pitch and those due to other prosodic factors such as intensity. Both pitch and the other prosodic factors had an influence on which target word was reported, but the effects were not strong enough to override the spatial difference produced by an interaural time difference of +/- 91 microseconds. In experiment 2, a large (+/- 15%) difference in apparent vocal-tract size between the speakers of the two sentences had an additional and strong effect, which, in conjunction with the original prosodic differences overrode an interaural time difference of +/- 181 microseconds. Experiment 3 showed that vocal-tract size differences of +/- 4% or less had no detectable effect. Overall, the results show that prosodic and vocal-tract size cues can override spatial cues in determining which target word belongs in an attended sentence.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10687706     DOI: 10.1121/1.428278

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  44 in total

1.  Influence of task-relevant and task-irrelevant feature continuity on selective auditory attention.

Authors:  Ross K Maddox; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-11-29

2.  The relative phonetic contributions of a cochlear implant and residual acoustic hearing to bimodal speech perception.

Authors:  Benjamin M Sheffield; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Location and acoustic scale cues in concurrent speech recognition.

Authors:  D Timothy Ives; Martin D Vestergaard; Doris J Kistler; Roy D Patterson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 4.  Objective neural indices of speech-in-noise perception.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2010-06

5.  Effects of Spectral Degradation on Attentional Modulation of Cortical Auditory Responses to Continuous Speech.

Authors:  Ying-Yee Kong; Ala Somarowthu; Nai Ding
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-09-11

6.  Listening to speech in the presence of other sounds.

Authors:  C J Darwin
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  A sound element gets lost in perceptual competition.

Authors:  Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham; Adrian K C Lee; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-07-05       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Effects of reverberant spatial cues on attention-dependent object formation.

Authors:  Adrian K C Lee; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2008-01-23

9.  Executive control of spatial attention shifts in the auditory compared to the visual modality.

Authors:  Katrin Krumbholz; Esther A Nobis; Robert J Weatheritt; Gereon R Fink
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Object continuity enhances selective auditory attention.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Erol J Ozmeral; Norbert Kopco; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-08-21       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.