Literature DB >> 12509020

Within-ear and across-ear interference in a cocktail-party listening task.

Douglas S Brungart1, Brian D Simpson.   

Abstract

Although many researchers have shown that listeners are able to selectively attend to a target speech signal when a masking talker is present in the same ear as the target speech or when a masking talker is present in a different ear than the target speech, little is known about selective auditory attention in tasks with a target talker in one ear and independent masking talkers in both ears at the same time. In this series of experiments, listeners were asked to respond to a target speech signal spoken by one of two competing talkers in their right (target) ear while ignoring a simultaneous masking sound in their left (unattended) ear. When the masking sound in the unattended ear was noise, listeners were able to segregate the competing talkers in the target ear nearly as well as they could with no sound in the unattended ear. When the masking sound in the unattended ear was speech, however, speech segregation in the target ear was substantially worse than with no sound in the unattended ear. When the masking sound in the unattended ear was time-reversed speech, speech segregation was degraded only when the target speech was presented at a lower level than the masking speech in the target ear. These results show that within-ear and across-ear speech segregation are closely related processes that cannot be performed simultaneously when the interfering sound in the unattended ear is qualitatively similar to speech.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12509020     DOI: 10.1121/1.1512703

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  29 in total

1.  Effects of the rate of formant-frequency variation on the grouping of formants in speech perception.

Authors:  Robert J Summers; Peter J Bailey; Brian Roberts
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-12-13

2.  Neural coding of continuous speech in auditory cortex during monaural and dichotic listening.

Authors:  Nai Ding; Jonathan Z Simon
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Individual differences and age effects in a dichotic informational masking paradigm.

Authors:  Frederic L Wightman; Doris J Kistler; Amanda O'Bryan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Stimulus factors influencing spatial release from speech-on-speech masking.

Authors:  Gerald Kidd; Christine R Mason; Virginia Best; Nicole Marrone
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Informational masking of speech in children: effects of ipsilateral and contralateral distracters.

Authors:  Frederic L Wightman; Doris J Kistler
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Listening to speech in the presence of other sounds.

Authors:  C J Darwin
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  The effects of hearing loss and age on the benefit of spatial separation between multiple talkers in reverberant rooms.

Authors:  Nicole Marrone; Christine R Mason; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Lexical and indexical cues in masking by competing speech.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Richard L Freyman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Asynchronous glimpsing of speech: spread of masking and task set-size.

Authors:  Erol J Ozmeral; Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  A map of periodicity orthogonal to frequency representation in the cat auditory cortex.

Authors:  Gerald Langner; Hubert R Dinse; Ben Godde
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.