Literature DB >> 22226928

Contrasting benefits from contralateral implants and hearing aids in cochlear implant users.

Richard J M van Hoesel1.   

Abstract

In recent years a substantial number of studies have reported results from cochlear implant users who increasingly are being fitted with a contralateral hearing aid or second implant. Often outcomes are discussed in relation to the benefits available to listeners with normal hearing in both ears. The objective of this paper is to consider the available cues that are degraded in different ways when a cochlear implant is combined with a contralateral hearing aid or second implant, and to review the literature in that context. It is found that the data largely confirm the expectations that arise from those considerations, and that outcomes differ substantially for the two types of listeners, with a greater emphasis on better ear selection and comparison of information at the two ears for bilateral implant users, and conversely, on the complementary use of information from the two ears in bimodal listeners.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22226928     DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2011.11.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  29 in total

1.  Evaluation of hearing aid frequency response fittings in pediatric and young adult bimodal recipients.

Authors:  Lisa S Davidson; Jill B Firszt; Chris Brenner; Jamie H Cadieux
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.664

2.  Neural ITD coding with bilateral cochlear implants: effect of binaurally coherent jitter.

Authors:  Kenneth E Hancock; Yoojin Chung; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Modeling binaural responses in the auditory brainstem to electric stimulation of the auditory nerve.

Authors:  Yoojin Chung; Bertrand Delgutte; H Steven Colburn
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-10-28

4.  Audio-visual speech intelligibility benefits with bilateral cochlear implants when talker location varies.

Authors:  Richard J M van Hoesel
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-01-13

5.  Sensitivity to interaural envelope correlation changes in bilateral cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Spatial attention in bilateral cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Alan Kan; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Speech Understanding in Noise for Adults With Cochlear Implants: Effects of Hearing Configuration, Source Location Certainty, and Head Movement.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Louise Loiselle; Sarah Natale; Sterling W Sheffield; Linsey W Sunderhaus; Mary S Dietrich; Michael F Dorman
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Lateralization of Interaural Level Differences with Multiple Electrode Stimulation in Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Listeners.

Authors:  Olga A Stakhovskaya; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Bimodal Hearing or Bilateral Cochlear Implants? Ask the Patient.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Michael F Dorman
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Neural Coding of Interaural Time Differences with Bilateral Cochlear Implants in Unanesthetized Rabbits.

Authors:  Yoojin Chung; Kenneth E Hancock; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.