Literature DB >> 19173424

Speech recognition by bilateral cochlear implant users in a cocktail-party setting.

Philipos C Loizou1, Yi Hu, Ruth Litovsky, Gongqiang Yu, Robert Peters, Jennifer Lake, Peter Roland.   

Abstract

Unlike prior studies with bilateral cochlear implant users which considered only one interferer, the present study considered realistic listening situations wherein multiple interferers were present and in some cases originating from both hemifields. Speech reception thresholds were measured in bilateral users unilaterally and bilaterally in four different spatial configurations, with one and three interferers consisting of modulated noise or competing talkers. The data were analyzed in terms of binaural benefits including monaural advantage (better-ear listening) and binaural interaction. The total advantage (overall spatial release) received was 2-5 dB and was maintained with multiple interferers present. This advantage was dominated by the monaural advantage, which ranged from 1 to 6 dB and was largest when the interferers were mostly energetic. No binaural-interaction benefit was found in the present study with either type of interferer (speech or noise). While the total and monaural advantage obtained for noise interferers was comparable to that attained by normal-hearing listeners, it was considerably lower for speech interferers. This suggests that bilateral users are less capable of taking advantage of binaural cues, in particular, under conditions of informational masking. Furthermore, the use of noise interferers does not adequately reflect the difficulties experienced by bilateral users in real-life situations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19173424      PMCID: PMC2676860          DOI: 10.1121/1.3036175

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  31 in total

1.  Speech perception as a function of electrical stimulation rate: using the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant system.

Authors:  A E Vandali; L A Whitford; K L Plant; G M Clark
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of two simultaneous talkers.

Authors:  D S Brungart
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Three-month results with bilateral cochlear implants.

Authors:  Richard S Tyler; Bruce J Gantz; Jay T Rubinstein; Blake S Wilson; Aaron J Parkinson; Abigail Wolaver; John P Preece; Shelley Witt; Mary W Lowder
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Binaural cochlear implants placed during the same operation.

Authors:  Bruce J Gantz; Richard S Tyler; Jay T Rubinstein; Abigail Wolaver; Mary Lowder; Paul Abbas; Carolyn Brown; Michelle Hughes; John P Preece
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.311

5.  Spatial release from informational masking in speech recognition.

Authors:  R L Freyman; U Balakrishnan; K S Helfer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Understanding speech in modulated interference: cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Peggy B Nelson; Su-Hyun Jin; Arlene Earley Carney; David A Nelson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Speech understanding in quiet and noise in bilateral users of the MED-EL COMBI 40/40+ cochlear implant system.

Authors:  Joachim Müller; F Schön; J Helms
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Speech perception, localization, and lateralization with bilateral cochlear implants.

Authors:  Richard J M van Hoesel; Richard S Tyler
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Effects of simulated cochlear-implant processing on speech reception in fluctuating maskers.

Authors:  Michael K Qin; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Different patterns of human discrimination learning for two interaural cues to sound-source location.

Authors:  B A Wright; M B Fitzgerald
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-10-09       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  76 in total

1.  Statistical bias in the assessment of binaural benefit relative to the better ear.

Authors:  Richard J M van Hoesel; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Sentence recognition in noise promoting or suppressing masking release by normal-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners.

Authors:  Bomjun J Kwon; Trevor T Perry; Cassie L Wilhelm; Eric W Healy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Multi-microphone adaptive noise reduction strategies for coordinated stimulation in bilateral cochlear implant devices.

Authors:  Kostas Kokkinakis; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Spatial release from masking in children with normal hearing and with bilateral cochlear implants: effect of interferer asymmetry.

Authors:  Sara M Misurelli; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Dual-carrier processing to convey temporal fine structure cues: Implications for cochlear implants.

Authors:  Frédéric Apoux; Carla L Youngdahl; Sarah E Yoho; Eric W Healy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Spatial release from masking in children with bilateral cochlear implants and with normal hearing: Effect of target-interferer similarity.

Authors:  Sara M Misurelli; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Evaluation and analysis of whispered speech for cochlear implant users: Gender identification and intelligibility.

Authors:  Oldooz Hazrati; Hussnain Ali; John H L Hansen; Emily Tobey
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Effect of mismatched place-of-stimulation on binaural fusion and lateralization in bilateral cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Alan Kan; Corey Stoelb; Ruth Y Litovsky; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  The effect of interaural fluctuation rate on correlation change discrimination.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-11-21

10.  Role of binaural hearing in speech intelligibility and spatial release from masking using vocoded speech.

Authors:  Soha N Garadat; Ruth Y Litovsky; Gongqiang Yu; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.