Literature DB >> 22779485

Spatial release from masking in children with normal hearing and with bilateral cochlear implants: effect of interferer asymmetry.

Sara M Misurelli1, Ruth Y Litovsky.   

Abstract

Spatial release from masking (SRM) was measured in groups of children with bilateral cochlear implants (BiCIs, average ages 6.0 and 7.9 yr) and with normal hearing (NH, average ages 5.0 and 7.8 yr). Speech reception thresholds (SRTs) were measured for target speech in front (0°), and interferers in front, distributed asymmetrically toward the right (+90°/+90°) or distributed symmetrically toward the right and left (+90°/-90°). In the asymmetrical condition both monaural "better ear" and binaural cues are available. In the symmetrical condition, listeners rely heavily on binaural cues to segregate sources. SRM was computed as the difference between SRTs in the front condition and SRTs in either the asymmetrical or symmetrical conditions. Results showed that asymmetrical SRM was smaller in BiCI users than NH children. Furthermore, NH children showed symmetrical SRM, suggesting they are able to use binaural cues for source segregation, whereas children with BiCIs had minimal or absent symmetrical SRM. These findings suggest that children who receive BiCIs can segregate speech from noise under conditions that maximize monaural better ear cues. Limitations in the CI devices likely play an important role in limiting SRM. Thus, improvement in spatial hearing abilities in children with BiCIs may require binaural processing strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22779485      PMCID: PMC3407161          DOI: 10.1121/1.4725760

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  38 in total

1.  The role of perceived spatial separation in the unmasking of speech.

Authors:  R L Freyman; K S Helfer; D D McCall; R K Clifton
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Cytoarchitectural and axonal maturation in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  J K Moore; Y L Guan
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2001-12

3.  Spatial release from informational masking in speech recognition.

Authors:  R L Freyman; U Balakrishnan; K S Helfer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effects of reverberation on perceptual segregation of competing voices.

Authors:  John F Culling; Kathryn I Hodder; Chaz Yee Toh
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Speech perception, localization, and lateralization with bilateral cochlear implants.

Authors:  Richard J M van Hoesel; Richard S Tyler
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Psychometric functions for informational masking.

Authors:  Robert A Lutfi; Doris J Kistler; Michael R Callahan; Frederic L Wightman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Informational masking: counteracting the effects of stimulus uncertainty by decreasing target-masker similarity.

Authors:  Nathaniel I Durlach; Christine R Mason; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham; Tanya L Arbogast; H Steven Colburn; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Sound localization in bilateral users of MED-EL COMBI 40/40+ cochlear implants.

Authors:  P Nopp; P Schleich; P D'Haese
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Head shadow, squelch, and summation effects in bilateral users of the MED-EL COMBI 40/40+ cochlear implant.

Authors:  P Schleich; P Nopp; P D'Haese
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  The benefit of binaural hearing in a cocktail party: effect of location and type of interferer.

Authors:  Monica L Hawley; Ruth Y Litovsky; John F Culling
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  33 in total

1.  Studies on bilateral cochlear implants at the University of Wisconsin's Binaural Hearing and Speech Laboratory.

Authors:  Ruth Y Litovsky; Matthew J Goupell; Shelly Godar; Tina Grieco-Calub; Gary L Jones; Soha N Garadat; Smita Agrawal; Alan Kan; Ann Todd; Christi Hess; Sara Misurelli
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.664

2.  Spatial release from masking in children with bilateral cochlear implants and with normal hearing: Effect of target-interferer similarity.

Authors:  Sara M Misurelli; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 3.  Development of the auditory system.

Authors:  Ruth Litovsky
Journal:  Handb Clin Neurol       Date:  2015

4.  Investigating long-term effects of cochlear implantation in single-sided deafness: a best practice model for longitudinal assessment of spatial hearing abilities and tinnitus handicap.

Authors:  Brian C Gartrell; Heath G Jones; Alan Kan; Melanie Buhr-Lawler; Samuel P Gubbels; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.311

5.  Effect of mismatched place-of-stimulation on binaural fusion and lateralization in bilateral cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Alan Kan; Corey Stoelb; Ruth Y Litovsky; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Binaural sensitivity in children who use bilateral cochlear implants.

Authors:  Erica Ehlers; Matthew J Goupell; Yi Zheng; Shelly P Godar; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Spatial attention in bilateral cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Alan Kan; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Does Bilateral Experience Lead to Improved Spatial Unmasking of Speech in Children Who Use Bilateral Cochlear Implants?

Authors:  Ruth Y Litovsky; Sara M Misurelli
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.311

9.  Spatial hearing benefits demonstrated with presentation of acoustic temporal fine structure cues in bilateral cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Tyler H Churchill; Alan Kan; Matthew J Goupell; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Binaural release from masking with single- and multi-electrode stimulation in children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Ann E Todd; Matthew J Goupell; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.