Literature DB >> 27500117

Device interchangeability on anterior chamber depth and white-to-white measurements: a thorough literature review.

Alberto Domínguez-Vicent1, Cari Pérez-Vives1, Teresa Ferrer-Blasco1, Santiago García-Lázaro1, Robert Montés-Micó1.   

Abstract

We have reviewed a set of recently published studies that compared the anterior chamber depth (ACD) and/or white-to-white (WTW) distance obtained by means of different measuring devices. Since some of those studies reached contradictory conclusions regarding device interchangeability, this review was carried out in attempting to clarify which clinical devices can or cannot be considered as interchangeable in clinical practice to measure ACD and/or WTW distance, among these devices: A-scan, ultrasound biomicroscopy, Orbscan and Orbscan II (Bausch&Lomb Surgical Inc., San Dimas, California, USA), Pentacam and Pentacam HR (Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany), Galilei (Ziemer, Switzerland), Visante optical coherence tomography (Visante OCT, Carl Zeiss Meditec Inc., Dublin, California, USA), IOLMaster (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany), and Lenstar LS 900/Biograph (Haag-Streit AG, Koeniz, Switzerland/Alcon Laboratories Inc., Ft Worth, Texas, USA).

Entities:  

Keywords:  anterior camber depth measurement; anterior chamber eye; device interchangeability; white to white measurement

Year:  2016        PMID: 27500117      PMCID: PMC4951663          DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2016.07.20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 2222-3959            Impact factor:   1.779


  32 in total

1.  Repeatability, reproducibility, and agreement of central anterior chamber depth measurements in pseudophakic and phakic eyes: optical coherence tomography versus ultrasound biomicroscopy.

Authors:  Qi Zhang; Wanqing Jin; Qinmei Wang
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.351

2.  Anterior chamber depth measurement with a-scan ultrasonography, Orbscan II, and IOLMaster.

Authors:  Hassan Hashemi; Kamran Yazdani; Shiva Mehravaran; Akbar Fotouhi
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.973

3.  Validity and repeatability of anterior chamber depth measurements with Pentacam and Orbscan.

Authors:  Birgit Lackner; Gerald Schmidinger; Christian Skorpik
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.973

4.  Anterior chamber depth measurements in phakic and pseudophakic eyes: Pentacam versus ultrasound device.

Authors:  Gabor Nemeth; Attila Vajas; Bence Kolozsvari; Andras Berta; Laszlo Modis
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.351

5.  Corneal changes after laser refractive surgery for myopia: comparison of Orbscan II and Pentacam findings.

Authors:  Hassan Hashemi; Shiva Mehravaran
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.351

6.  Comparison of anterior chamber depth measurements taken with the Pentacam, Orbscan IIz and IOLMaster in myopic and emmetropic eyes.

Authors:  Canan Asli Utine; Feyza Altin; Hanefi Cakir; Irfan Perente
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-09-05       Impact factor: 3.761

7.  Anterior chamber depth measurements obtained with Pentacam HR® imaging system and conventional A-scan ultrasound.

Authors:  Eszter Szalai; András Berta; Gábor Németh; Ziad Hassan; László Módis
Journal:  Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging       Date:  2011-02-17

8.  Comparison of immersion ultrasound, partial coherence interferometry, and low coherence reflectometry for ocular biometry in cataract patients.

Authors:  Robert Montés-Micó; Francesco Carones; Antonietta Buttacchio; Teresa Ferrer-Blasco; David Madrid-Costa
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  Comparison of anterior chamber depth measurements using Orbscan II and IOLMaster.

Authors:  I B Frisch; T M Rabsilber; K A Becker; A J Reuland; G U Auffarth
Journal:  Eur J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.597

10.  Comparison of central corneal thickness and anterior chamber depth measurements using three imaging technologies in normal eyes and after phakic intraocular lens implantation.

Authors:  Muriël Doors; Lars P J Cruysberg; Tos T J M Berendschot; John de Brabander; Frenne Verbakel; Carroll A B Webers; Rudy M M A Nuijts
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-04-30       Impact factor: 3.117

View more
  10 in total

1.  Ocular biometry through fully refocused steady-state magnetic resonance imaging sequence: reliability and agreement with the IOLMaster® 500.

Authors:  Lorenzo Ismael Perez-Sanchez; Julia Gutierrez-Vazquez; Maria Satrustegui-Lapetra; Francisco Ferreira-Manuel; Juan Jose Arevalo-Manso; Juan Jesus Gomez-Herrera; Juan Jose Criado-Alvarez
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Comparison of anterior segment measurements with LenStar and Pentacam in patients with newly diagnosed glaucoma.

Authors:  Emine Sen; Merve Inanc; Ufuk Elgin; Pelin Yilmazbas
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-01-21       Impact factor: 2.031

3.  Agreement analysis of Lenstar with other four techniques of biometry before cataract surgery.

Authors:  Jinling Zhang; Yong Wang
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 2.029

4.  Comparison of Anterior Segment Parameters and Axial Length Using Two Scheimpflug Devices with Integrated Optical Biometers.

Authors:  Chantaka Supiyaphun; Sasivimol Rattanasiri; Passara Jongkhajornpong
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-10-23

5.  Agreement of white-to-white measurements with swept-source OCT, Scheimpflug and color LED devices.

Authors:  Pedro Tañá-Rivero; Salvador Aguilar-Córcoles; José Luís Rodríguez-Prats; Robert Montés-Micó; Ramón Ruiz-Mesa
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 2.031

6.  Agreement and Repeatability of Two Biometers to Measure Anterior Segment Components: Refractive Error Effect.

Authors:  Alberto Domínguez-Vicent; Rune Brautaset
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2018-11-10

7.  Comparison of Ocular Biometry Using New Swept-source Optical Coherence Tomography-based Optical Biometer with Other Devices.

Authors:  Young Joo Cho; Tae Hyung Lim; Kee Yong Choi; Beom Jin Cho
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-08

8.  Effect of orthokeratology on precision and agreement assessment of a new swept-source optical coherence tomography biometer.

Authors:  Bao Shu; Fangjun Bao; Giacomo Savini; Weicong Lu; Ruixue Tu; Haisi Chen; Benhao Song; Qinmei Wang; Jinhai Huang
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2020-03-02

9.  Validating the use of U-tool as a novel method for measuring the corneal diameter in infants screened for congenital glaucoma.

Authors:  Rahul Kumar Bafna; Karthikeyan Mahalingam; Vaishali Rakheja; Namrata Sharma; Shikha Gupta; Roy Arokiam Daniel; Viney Gupta
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 1.848

10.  Comparison of Anterior Segment Measurements with a New Multifunctional Unit and Five Other Devices.

Authors:  Bo Yi Kim; Ikhyun Jun
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-06-15
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.