| Literature DB >> 26995492 |
Desmond H Y Tse1, Christopher J Wiggins2, Dimo Ivanov3, Daniel Brenner4, Jens Hoffmann5, Christian Mirkes5,6, Gunamony Shajan5, Klaus Scheffler5,6, Kâmil Uludağ3,2, Benedikt A Poser3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To overcome the challenges of B0 and RF excitation inhomogeneity at ultra-high field MRI, a workflow for volumetric B0 and flip-angle homogenisation was implemented on a human 9.4 T scanner.Entities:
Keywords: 3D EPI; B0 shimming; Flip-angle homogenisation; MPRAGE; Parallel transmission; Ultra-high field MR
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26995492 PMCID: PMC4891373 DOI: 10.1007/s10334-016-0543-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: MAGMA ISSN: 0968-5243 Impact factor: 2.310
Fig. 1The volumetric B0 and flip-angle homogenisation workflow
Fig. 2a, b Channel-by-channel RF. a amplitudes and b phases from an 8-point kT-points pulse of total duration 2.24 ms. c The gradient blips correspond to the 8-point kT-point trajectory. d The k-space trajectory of the 8-point kT-points pulse which starts and ends at the k-space centre
Fig. 3a B0 map derived from a 3D dual-echo GRE under the tune-up shim setting. b The fitted B0 using the available fields from all the 1st and 2nd order shim coils. c The fitted B0 field using all the available fields from the 1st and 2nd order shim coils, and four 3rd order shim coils: Z3, Z2X, Z2Y, ZX2Y2. d Prediction of the shimmed B0 field using shim coils up to 2nd order. e Prediction of the shimmed B0 field using all available shim coils up to the 3rd order. The white arrows in the sagittal view of d, e indicate the difference in the shim results in the frontal lobe. f B0 map measured after applying the shim values from e
Fig. 4Top row CP-mode B1+ magnitude distribution; middle row MLS optimised 8-point kT-points pulse flip-angle distribution; bottom row the flip angle distribution of the kT-points pulse measured by a one-slice PreSat-TFL in sagittal orientation. The target flip-angle set in the PreSat-TFL protocol was 45 degrees
Fig. 5Achieved flip-angle as result of Bloch simulation for top row TR-FOCI adiabatic inversion pulse (79.8 V); bottom row standard hyperbolic secant adiabatic inversion pulse (166.0 V)
Fig. 6Box plots of a the standard deviation and b the 90th percentile range of B0 distributions after shimming with and without including the 3rd order coils; and the normalised RMSE of c the CP-mode and kT-points excitation pulses and d the Hyperbolic secant and TR-FOCI inversion pulses. In each box, the central mark is the median; the edges of the box are the 25th and 75th percentiles. The whiskers extend to the most extreme values which are not outliers, and the outliers are plotted as red crosses individually
Fig. 7a T1-weighted MPRAGE image using TR-FOCI inversion and CP-mode excitation (left column) and kT-points excitation (right column). The intensities in both columns are scaled identically. b Proton density image using kT-points. c Brain extracted and receive bias corrected T1-weighted image from a and b. d–f Grey matter, white matter and cerebrospinal fluid tissue probability maps extracted from c using FSL-FAST
Fig. 83D EPI images at 0.75 mm isotropic resolution, obtained using CP-mode (top row) and kT-points (bottom row) excitations