Literature DB >> 24259479

Fast quantitative susceptibility mapping with L1-regularization and automatic parameter selection.

Berkin Bilgic1, Audrey P Fan, Jonathan R Polimeni, Stephen F Cauley, Marta Bianciardi, Elfar Adalsteinsson, Lawrence L Wald, Kawin Setsompop.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To enable fast reconstruction of quantitative susceptibility maps with total variation penalty and automatic regularization parameter selection.
METHODS: ℓ(1) -Regularized susceptibility mapping is accelerated by variable splitting, which allows closed-form evaluation of each iteration of the algorithm by soft thresholding and fast Fourier transforms. This fast algorithm also renders automatic regularization parameter estimation practical. A weighting mask derived from the magnitude signal can be incorporated to allow edge-aware regularization.
RESULTS: Compared with the nonlinear conjugate gradient (CG) solver, the proposed method is 20 times faster. A complete pipeline including Laplacian phase unwrapping, background phase removal with SHARP filtering, and ℓ(1) -regularized dipole inversion at 0.6 mm isotropic resolution is completed in 1.2 min using MATLAB on a standard workstation compared with 22 min using the CG solver. This fast reconstruction allows estimation of regularization parameters with the L-curve method in 13 min, which would have taken 4 h with the CG algorithm. The proposed method also permits magnitude-weighted regularization, which prevents smoothing across edges identified on the magnitude signal. This more complicated optimization problem is solved 5 times faster than the nonlinear CG approach. Utility of the proposed method is also demonstrated in functional blood oxygen level-dependent susceptibility mapping, where processing of the massive time series dataset would otherwise be prohibitive with the CG solver.
CONCLUSION: Online reconstruction of regularized susceptibility maps may become feasible with the proposed dipole inversion.
Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  L-curve; Quantitative susceptibility mapping; Regularization; Total variation

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24259479      PMCID: PMC4111791          DOI: 10.1002/mrm.25029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  27 in total

1.  High-field MRI of brain cortical substructure based on signal phase.

Authors:  Jeff H Duyn; Peter van Gelderen; Tie-Qiang Li; Jacco A de Zwart; Alan P Koretsky; Masaki Fukunaga
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-06-22       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Calculation of susceptibility through multiple orientation sampling (COSMOS): a method for conditioning the inverse problem from measured magnetic field map to susceptibility source image in MRI.

Authors:  Tian Liu; Pascal Spincemaille; Ludovic de Rochefort; Bryan Kressler; Yi Wang
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Whole brain susceptibility mapping using compressed sensing.

Authors:  Bing Wu; Wei Li; Arnaud Guidon; Chunlei Liu
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Morphology enabled dipole inversion (MEDI) from a single-angle acquisition: comparison with COSMOS in human brain imaging.

Authors:  Tian Liu; Jing Liu; Ludovic de Rochefort; Pascal Spincemaille; Ildar Khalidov; James Robert Ledoux; Yi Wang
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-04-04       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Combining phase images from multi-channel RF coils using 3D phase offset maps derived from a dual-echo scan.

Authors:  Simon Robinson; Günther Grabner; Stephan Witoszynskyj; Siegfried Trattnig
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Phase-based regional oxygen metabolism (PROM) using MRI.

Authors:  Audrey P Fan; Thomas Benner; Divya S Bolar; Bruce R Rosen; Elfar Adalsteinsson
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Differentiation between diamagnetic and paramagnetic cerebral lesions based on magnetic susceptibility mapping.

Authors:  Ferdinand Schweser; Andreas Deistung; Berengar W Lehr; Jürgen R Reichenbach
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Measuring iron in the brain using quantitative susceptibility mapping and X-ray fluorescence imaging.

Authors:  Weili Zheng; Helen Nichol; Saifeng Liu; Yu-Chung N Cheng; E Mark Haacke
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-04-13       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Development of a robust method for generating 7.0 T multichannel phase images of the brain with application to normal volunteers and patients with neurological diseases.

Authors:  Kathryn E Hammond; Janine M Lupo; Duan Xu; Meredith Metcalf; Douglas A C Kelley; Daniel Pelletier; Susan M Chang; Pratik Mukherjee; Daniel B Vigneron; Sarah J Nelson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Computed inverse resonance imaging for magnetic susceptibility map reconstruction.

Authors:  Zikuan Chen; Vince Calhoun
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2012 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.826

View more
  42 in total

1.  Streaking artifact reduction for quantitative susceptibility mapping of sources with large dynamic range.

Authors:  Hongjiang Wei; Russell Dibb; Yan Zhou; Yawen Sun; Jianrong Xu; Nian Wang; Chunlei Liu
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 4.044

Review 2.  Susceptibility-based time-resolved whole-organ and regional tissue oximetry.

Authors:  Felix W Wehrli; Audrey P Fan; Zachary B Rodgers; Erin K Englund; Michael C Langham
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 4.044

3.  Wave-CAIPI for highly accelerated 3D imaging.

Authors:  Berkin Bilgic; Borjan A Gagoski; Stephen F Cauley; Audrey P Fan; Jonathan R Polimeni; P Ellen Grant; Lawrence L Wald; Kawin Setsompop
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Automated adaptive preconditioner for quantitative susceptibility mapping.

Authors:  Zhe Liu; Yan Wen; Pascal Spincemaille; Shun Zhang; Yihao Yao; Thanh D Nguyen; Yi Wang
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-08-11       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Structure tensor informed fibre tractography at 3T.

Authors:  Kwok-Shing Chan; David G Norris; José P Marques
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-07-21       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Bone susceptibility mapping with MRI is an alternative and reliable biomarker of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Yanjun Chen; Yihao Guo; Xintao Zhang; Yingjie Mei; Yanqiu Feng; Xiaodong Zhang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Enhancing k-space quantitative susceptibility mapping by enforcing consistency on the cone data (CCD) with structural priors.

Authors:  Yan Wen; Yi Wang; Tian Liu
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Comparison of parameter optimization methods for quantitative susceptibility mapping.

Authors:  Carlos Milovic; Claudia Prieto; Berkin Bilgic; Sergio Uribe; Julio Acosta-Cabronero; Pablo Irarrazaval; Cristian Tejos
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Model-based iterative reconstruction for single-shot EPI at 7T.

Authors:  Uten Yarach; Myung-Ho In; Itthi Chatnuntawech; Berkin Bilgic; Frank Godenschweger; Hendrik Mattern; Alessandro Sciarra; Oliver Speck
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  Preconditioned total field inversion (TFI) method for quantitative susceptibility mapping.

Authors:  Zhe Liu; Youngwook Kee; Dong Zhou; Yi Wang; Pascal Spincemaille
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 4.668

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.