Literature DB >> 3747821

The intrinsic signal-to-noise ratio in NMR imaging.

W A Edelstein, G H Glover, C J Hardy, R W Redington.   

Abstract

The fundamental limit for NMR imaging is set by an intrinsic signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) for a particular combination of rf antenna and imaging subjects. The intrinsic SNR is the signal from a small volume of material in the sample competing with electrical noise from thermally generated, random noise currents in the sample. The intrinsic SNR has been measured for a number of antenna-body section combinations at several different values of the static magnetic field and is proportional to B0. We have applied the intrinsic and system SNR to predict image SNR and have found satisfactory agreement with measurements on images. The relationship between SNR and pixel size is quite different in NMR than it is with imaging modalities using ionizing radiation, and indicates that the initial choice of pixel size is crucial in NMR. The analog of "contrast-detail-dose" plots for ionizing radiation imaging modalities is the "contrast-detail-time" plot in NMR, which should prove useful in choosing a suitable pixel array to visualize a particular anatomical detail for a given NMR receiving antenna.

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3747821     DOI: 10.1002/mrm.1910030413

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  157 in total

1.  Multivoxel 3D proton spectroscopy in the brain at 1.5 versus 3.0 T: signal-to-noise ratio and resolution comparison.

Authors:  O Gonen; S Gruber; B S Li; V Mlynárik; E Moser
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Interventional loopless antenna at 7 T.

Authors:  Mehmet Arcan Ertürk; Abdel-Monem M El-Sharkawy; Paul A Bottomley
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  The promise of high-field-strength MR imaging.

Authors:  Joseph A Helpern
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Lumped-element planar strip array (LPSA) for parallel MRI.

Authors:  Ray F Lee; Christopher J Hardy; Daniel K Sodickson; Paul A Bottomley
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Transmit/receive headcoil for optimal 1H MR spectroscopy of the brain in paediatric patients at 3T.

Authors:  D W J Klomp; M van der Graaf; M A A P Willemsen; Y M van der Meulen; A P M Kentgens; A Heerschap
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2004-05-24       Impact factor: 2.310

6.  [Cardiac functional analysis with MRI].

Authors:  T A Sandner; D Theisen; K U Bauner; M Picciolo; M F Reiser; B J Wintersperger
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 0.635

7.  MR imaging of the brachial plexus: comparison between 1.5-T and 3-T MR imaging: preliminary experience.

Authors:  Alberto Tagliafico; Giulia Succio; Carlo Emanuele Neumaier; Giovanni Serafini; Matteo Ghidara; Massimo Calabrese; Carlo Martinoli
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2010-10-23       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  MODEL-BASED IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION FOR MRI.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Fessler
Journal:  IEEE Signal Process Mag       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 12.551

9.  Evaluation of image quality of a 32-channel versus a 12-channel head coil at 1.5T for MR imaging of the brain.

Authors:  P T Parikh; G S Sandhu; K A Blackham; M D Coffey; D Hsu; K Liu; J Jesberger; M Griswold; J L Sunshine
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 3.825

10.  Physiological noise effects on the flip angle selection in BOLD fMRI.

Authors:  J Gonzalez-Castillo; V Roopchansingh; P A Bandettini; J Bodurka
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.