Literature DB >> 19233292

T1 weighted brain images at 7 Tesla unbiased for Proton Density, T2* contrast and RF coil receive B1 sensitivity with simultaneous vessel visualization.

Pierre-François Van de Moortele1, Edwards J Auerbach, Cheryl Olman, Essa Yacoub, Kâmil Uğurbil, Steen Moeller.   

Abstract

At high magnetic field, MR images exhibit large, undesirable signal intensity variations commonly referred to as "intensity field bias". Such inhomogeneities mostly originate from heterogeneous RF coil B(1) profiles and, with no appropriate correction, are further pronounced when utilizing rooted sum of square reconstruction with receive coil arrays. These artifacts can significantly alter whole brain high resolution T(1)-weighted (T(1)w) images that are extensively utilized for clinical diagnosis, for gray/white matter segmentation as well as for coregistration with functional time series. In T(1) weighted 3D-MPRAGE sequences, it is possible to preserve a bulk amount of T(1) contrast through space by using adiabatic inversion RF pulses that are insensitive to transmit B(1) variations above a minimum threshold. However, large intensity variations persist in the images, which are significantly more difficult to address at very high field where RF coil B(1) profiles become more heterogeneous. Another characteristic of T(1)w MPRAGE sequences is their intrinsic sensitivity to Proton Density and T(2)(*) contrast, which cannot be removed with post-processing algorithms utilized to correct for receive coil sensitivity. In this paper, we demonstrate a simple technique capable of producing normalized, high resolution T(1)w 3D-MPRAGE images that are devoid of receive coil sensitivity, Proton Density and T(2)(*) contrast. These images, which are suitable for routinely obtaining whole brain tissue segmentation at 7 T, provide higher T(1) contrast specificity than standard MPRAGE acquisitions. Our results show that removing the Proton Density component can help in identifying small brain structures and that T(2)(*) induced artifacts can be removed from the images. The resulting unbiased T(1)w images can also be used to generate Maximum Intensity Projection angiograms, without additional data acquisition, that are inherently registered with T(1)w structural images. In addition, we introduce a simple technique to reduce residual signal intensity variations induced by transmit B(1) heterogeneity. Because this approach requires two 3D images, one divided with the other, head motion could create serious problems, especially at high spatial resolution. To alleviate such inter-scan motion problems, we developed a new sequence where the two contrast acquisitions are interleaved within a single scan. This interleaved approach however comes with greater risk of intra-scan motion issues because of a longer single scan time. Users can choose between these two trade offs depending on specific protocols and patient populations. We believe that the simplicity and the robustness of this double contrast based approach to address intensity field bias at high field and improve T(1) contrast specificity, together with the capability of simultaneously obtaining angiography maps, advantageously counter balance the potential drawbacks of the technique, mainly a longer acquisition time and a moderate reduction in signal to noise ratio.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19233292      PMCID: PMC2700263          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.02.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  38 in total

1.  In vivo method for correcting transmit/receive nonuniformities with phased array coils.

Authors:  Jinghua Wang; Maolin Qiu; R Todd Constable
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Detection of entorhinal layer II using 7Tesla [corrected] magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Jean C Augustinack; Andre J W van der Kouwe; Megan L Blackwell; David H Salat; Christopher J Wiggins; Matthew P Frosch; Graham C Wiggins; Andreas Potthast; Lawrence L Wald; Bruce R Fischl
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 10.422

3.  Intensity non-uniformity correction in MRI: existing methods and their validation.

Authors:  Boubakeur Belaroussi; Julien Milles; Sabin Carme; Yue Min Zhu; Hugues Benoit-Cattin
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2005-11-22       Impact factor: 8.545

4.  Extensive heterogeneity in white matter intensity in high-resolution T2*-weighted MRI of the human brain at 7.0 T.

Authors:  Tie-Qiang Li; Peter van Gelderen; Hellmut Merkle; Lalith Talagala; Alan P Koretsky; Jeff Duyn
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-07-18       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Actual flip-angle imaging in the pulsed steady state: a method for rapid three-dimensional mapping of the transmitted radiofrequency field.

Authors:  Vasily L Yarnykh
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 6.  Imaging artifacts at 3.0T.

Authors:  Matt A Bernstein; John Huston; Heidi A Ward
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Exploring the limits of RF shimming for high-field MRI of the human head.

Authors:  Weihua Mao; Michael B Smith; Christopher M Collins
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Parallel RF transmission with eight channels at 3 Tesla.

Authors:  Kawin Setsompop; Lawrence L Wald; Vijayanand Alagappan; Borjan Gagoski; Franz Hebrank; Ulrich Fontius; Franz Schmitt; Elfar Adalsteinsson
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Novel method for rapid, simultaneous T1, T2*, and proton density quantification.

Authors:  J B M Warntjes; O Dahlqvist; P Lundberg
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  Magnetic field and tissue dependencies of human brain longitudinal 1H2O relaxation in vivo.

Authors:  William D Rooney; Glyn Johnson; Xin Li; Eric R Cohen; Seong-Gi Kim; Kamil Ugurbil; Charles S Springer
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.668

View more
  130 in total

Review 1.  In vivo structural imaging of the cerebellum, the contribution of ultra-high fields.

Authors:  José P Marques; Rolf Gruetter; Wietske van der Zwaag
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.847

2.  Mapping human cortical areas in vivo based on myelin content as revealed by T1- and T2-weighted MRI.

Authors:  Matthew F Glasser; David C Van Essen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Assessment of Silent T1-weighted head imaging at 7 T.

Authors:  Mauro Costagli; Mark R Symms; Lorenzo Angeli; Douglas A C Kelley; Laura Biagi; Andrea Farnetani; Catarina Rua; Graziella Donatelli; Gianluigi Tiberi; Michela Tosetti; Mirco Cosottini
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Frequency preference and attention effects across cortical depths in the human primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Federico De Martino; Michelle Moerel; Kamil Ugurbil; Rainer Goebel; Essa Yacoub; Elia Formisano
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Processing of natural sounds: characterization of multipeak spectral tuning in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Michelle Moerel; Federico De Martino; Roberta Santoro; Kamil Ugurbil; Rainer Goebel; Essa Yacoub; Elia Formisano
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Impact of chiasma opticum malformations on the organization of the human ventral visual cortex.

Authors:  Falko R Kaule; Barbara Wolynski; Irene Gottlob; Joerg Stadler; Oliver Speck; Martin Kanowski; Synke Meltendorf; Wolfgang Behrens-Baumann; Michael B Hoffmann
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-04-25       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Cortical fibers orientation mapping using in-vivo whole brain 7 T diffusion MRI.

Authors:  Omer F Gulban; Federico De Martino; An T Vu; Essa Yacoub; Kamil Uğurbil; Christophe Lenglet
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Cortical correlates of human motion perception biases.

Authors:  Brett Vintch; Justin L Gardner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 9.  Magnetic-resonance-based electrical properties tomography: a review.

Authors:  Xiaotong Zhang; Jiaen Liu; Bin He
Journal:  IEEE Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2014

10.  Similarity judgments and cortical visual responses reflect different properties of object and scene categories in naturalistic images.

Authors:  Marcie L King; Iris I A Groen; Adam Steel; Dwight J Kravitz; Chris I Baker
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.