Juliane Budde1, G Shajan, Maxim Zaitsev, Klaus Scheffler, Rolf Pohmann. 1. Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, High Field Magnetic Resonance Center, Tübingen, Germany; Graduate School of Neural and Behavioural Sciences, International Max Planck Research School, Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The increased signal-to-noise ratio and blood oxygen level dependent signal at ultra-high field can only help to boost the resolution in functional MRI studies if the spatial specificity of the activation signal is improved. At a field strength of 9.4 T, both gradient-echo and spin-echo based echo-planar imaging were implemented and applied to investigate the specificity of human functional MRI. A finger tapping paradigm was used to acquire functional MRI data with scan parameters similar to standard neuroscientific applications. METHODS: Spatial resolution, echo, and readout times were varied to determine their influence on the distribution of the blood oxygen level dependent signal. High-resolution co-localized images were used to classify the signal according to its origin in veins or tissue. RESULTS: High-quality activation maps were obtained with both sequences. Signal contributions from tissue were found to be smaller or slightly larger than from veins. Gradient-echo echo-planar imaging yielded lower ratios of micro-/macro-vascular signals of around 0.6 than spin-echo based functional MRI, where this ratio varied between 0.75 and 1.02, with higher values for larger echo and shorter readout time. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the feasibility of human functional MRI at 9.4 T with high spatial specificity. Although venous contributions could not be entirely suppressed, venous effects in spin-echo echo-planar imaging are significantly reduced compared with gradient-echo echo-planar imaging.
PURPOSE: The increased signal-to-noise ratio and blood oxygen level dependent signal at ultra-high field can only help to boost the resolution in functional MRI studies if the spatial specificity of the activation signal is improved. At a field strength of 9.4 T, both gradient-echo and spin-echo based echo-planar imaging were implemented and applied to investigate the specificity of human functional MRI. A finger tapping paradigm was used to acquire functional MRI data with scan parameters similar to standard neuroscientific applications. METHODS: Spatial resolution, echo, and readout times were varied to determine their influence on the distribution of the blood oxygen level dependent signal. High-resolution co-localized images were used to classify the signal according to its origin in veins or tissue. RESULTS: High-quality activation maps were obtained with both sequences. Signal contributions from tissue were found to be smaller or slightly larger than from veins. Gradient-echo echo-planar imaging yielded lower ratios of micro-/macro-vascular signals of around 0.6 than spin-echo based functional MRI, where this ratio varied between 0.75 and 1.02, with higher values for larger echo and shorter readout time. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the feasibility of human functional MRI at 9.4 T with high spatial specificity. Although venous contributions could not be entirely suppressed, venous effects in spin-echo echo-planar imaging are significantly reduced compared with gradient-echo echo-planar imaging.
Authors: Joana R Loureiro; Gisela E Hagberg; Thomas Ethofer; Michael Erb; Jonas Bause; Philipp Ehses; Klaus Scheffler; Marc Himmelbach Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2016-09-23 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Alexander J S Beckett; Tetiana Dadakova; Jennifer Townsend; Laurentius Huber; Suhyung Park; David A Feinberg Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2020-06-18 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Laurentius Huber; Dimo Ivanov; Daniel A Handwerker; Sean Marrett; Maria Guidi; Kâmil Uludağ; Peter A Bandettini; Benedikt A Poser Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2016-11-18 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Yi He; Maosen Wang; Xuming Chen; Rolf Pohmann; Jonathan R Polimeni; Klaus Scheffler; Bruce R Rosen; David Kleinfeld; Xin Yu Journal: Neuron Date: 2018-02-21 Impact factor: 17.173
Authors: Mario Gilberto Báez-Yánez; Philipp Ehses; Christian Mirkes; Philbert S Tsai; David Kleinfeld; Klaus Scheffler Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2017-09-08 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Desmond H Y Tse; Christopher J Wiggins; Dimo Ivanov; Daniel Brenner; Jens Hoffmann; Christian Mirkes; Gunamony Shajan; Klaus Scheffler; Kâmil Uludağ; Benedikt A Poser Journal: MAGMA Date: 2016-03-19 Impact factor: 2.310