Literature DB >> 33225120

Quantifying bias and precision of kinetic parameter estimation on the PennPET Explorer, a long axial field-of-view scanner.

Varsha Viswanath1, Austin R Pantel2, Margaret E Daube-Witherspoon2, Robert Doot2, Mark Muzi3, David A Mankoff2, Joel S Karp2.   

Abstract

Long axial field-of-view (AFOV) PET scanners allow for full-body dynamic imaging in a single bed-position at very high sensitivity. However, the benefits for kinetic parameter estimation have yet to be studied. This work uses (1) a dynamic GATE simulation of [18F]-fluorothymidine (FLT) in a modified NEMA IQ phantom and (2) a lesion embedding study of spheres in a dynamic [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) human subject imaged on the PennPET Explorer. Both studies were designed using published kinetic data of lung and liver cancers and modeled using two tissue compartments. Data were reconstructed at various emulated doses. Sphere time-activity curves (TACs) were measured on resulting dynamic images, and TACs were fit using a two-tissue-compartment model (k4 ≠ 0) for the FLT study and both a two-tissue-compartment model (k4 = 0) and Patlak graphical analysis for the FDG study to estimate flux (Ki) and delivery (K1) parameters. Quantification of flux and K1 shows lower bias and better precision for both radiotracers on the long AFOV scanner, especially at low doses. Dynamic imaging on a long AFOV system can be achieved for a greater range of injected doses, as low as 0.5-2 mCi depending on the sphere size and flux, compared to a standard AFOV scanner, while maintaining good kinetic parameter estimation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dynamic imaging; FDG; FLT; GATE simulations; Lesion embedding; PennPET Explorer; long axial field of view PET

Year:  2020        PMID: 33225120      PMCID: PMC7673289          DOI: 10.1109/trpms.2020.3021315

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci        ISSN: 2469-7303


  40 in total

1.  Physical and clinical performance of the mCT time-of-flight PET/CT scanner.

Authors:  B W Jakoby; Y Bercier; M Conti; M E Casey; B Bendriem; D W Townsend
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Development of a small prototype for a proof-of-concept of OpenPET imaging.

Authors:  Taiga Yamaya; Eiji Yoshida; Taku Inaniwa; Shinji Sato; Yasunori Nakajima; Hidekatsu Wakizaka; Daisuke Kokuryo; Atsushi Tsuji; Takayuki Mitsuhashi; Hideyuki Kawai; Hideaki Tashima; Fumihiko Nishikido; Naoko Inadama; Hideo Murayama; Hideaki Haneishi; Mikio Suga; Shoko Kinouchi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-01-25       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Performance Evaluation of the Vereos PET/CT System According to the NEMA NU2-2012 Standard.

Authors:  Ivo Rausch; Agustin Ruiz; Itziar Valverde-Pascual; Jacobo Cal-González; Thomas Beyer; Ignasi Carrio
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  Performance Characteristics of the Digital Biograph Vision PET/CT System.

Authors:  Joyce van Sluis; Johan de Jong; Jenny Schaar; Walter Noordzij; Paul van Snick; Rudi Dierckx; Ronald Borra; Antoon Willemsen; Ronald Boellaard
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Getting the Most out of 18F-FDG PET Scans: The Predictive Value of 18F-FDG PET-Derived Blood Flow Estimates for Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Robert K Doot
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Graphical evaluation of blood-to-brain transfer constants from multiple-time uptake data. Generalizations.

Authors:  C S Patlak; R G Blasberg
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 6.200

7.  Dynamic whole-body PET parametric imaging: II. Task-oriented statistical estimation.

Authors:  Nicolas A Karakatsanis; Martin A Lodge; Y Zhou; Richard L Wahl; Arman Rahmim
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Dynamic whole-body PET parametric imaging: I. Concept, acquisition protocol optimization and clinical application.

Authors:  Nicolas A Karakatsanis; Martin A Lodge; Abdel K Tahari; Y Zhou; Richard L Wahl; Arman Rahmim
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Lung cancer: reproducibility of quantitative measurements for evaluating 2-[F-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose uptake at PET.

Authors:  H Minn; K R Zasadny; L E Quint; R L Wahl
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Design Study of a Whole-Body PET Scanner with Improved Spatial and Timing Resolution.

Authors:  S Surti; Adam R Shore; Joel S Karp
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 1.679

View more
  5 in total

1.  First results on kinetic modelling and parametric imaging of dynamic 18F-FDG datasets from a long axial FOV PET scanner in oncological patients.

Authors:  Hasan Sari; Clemens Mingels; Ian Alberts; Jicun Hu; Dorothee Buesser; Vijay Shah; Robin Schepers; Patrik Caluori; Vladimir Panin; Maurizio Conti; Ali Afshar-Oromieh; Kuangyu Shi; Lars Eriksson; Axel Rominger; Paul Cumming
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 2.  Oncologic Applications of Long Axial Field-of-View PET/Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Lorenzo Nardo; Austin R Pantel
Journal:  PET Clin       Date:  2021-01

Review 3.  Analysis of Four-Dimensional Data for Total Body PET Imaging.

Authors:  Varsha Viswanath; Rhea Chitalia; Austin R Pantel; Joel S Karp; David A Mankoff
Journal:  PET Clin       Date:  2021-01

4.  Abbreviated scan protocols to capture 18F-FDG kinetics for long axial FOV PET scanners.

Authors:  Varsha Viswanath; Hasan Sari; Austin R Pantel; Maurizio Conti; Margaret E Daube-Witherspoon; Clemens Mingels; Ian Alberts; Lars Eriksson; Kuangyu Shi; Axel Rominger; Joel S Karp
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-03-12       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Principles of Tracer Kinetic Analysis in Oncology, Part II: Examples and Future Directions.

Authors:  Austin R Pantel; Varsha Viswanath; Mark Muzi; Robert K Doot; David A Mankoff
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 11.082

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.