Literature DB >> 21610291

Effective count rates for PET scanners with reduced and extended axial field of view.

L R MacDonald1, R L Harrison, A M Alessio, W C J Hunter, T K Lewellen, P E Kinahan.   

Abstract

We investigated the relationship between noise equivalent count (NEC) and axial field of view (AFOV) for PET scanners with AFOVs ranging from one-half to twice those of current clinical scanners. PET scanners with longer or shorter AFOVs could fulfill different clinical needs depending on exam volumes and site economics. Using previously validated Monte Carlo simulations, we modeled true, scattered and random coincidence counting rates for a PET ring diameter of 88 cm with 2, 4, 6, and 8 rings of detector blocks (AFOV 7.8, 15.5, 23.3, and 31.0 cm). Fully 3D acquisition mode was compared to full collimation (2D) and partial collimation (2.5D) modes. Counting rates were estimated for a 200 cm long version of the 20 cm diameter NEMA count-rate phantom and for an anthropomorphic object based on a patient scan. We estimated the live-time characteristics of the scanner from measured count-rate data and applied that estimate to the simulated results to obtain NEC as a function of object activity. We found NEC increased as a quadratic function of AFOV for 3D mode, and linearly in 2D mode. Partial collimation provided the highest overall NEC on the 2-block system and fully 3D mode provided the highest NEC on the 8-block system for clinically relevant activities. On the 4-, and 6-block systems 3D mode NEC was highest up to ∼300 MBq in the anthropomorphic phantom, above which 3D NEC dropped rapidly, and 2.5D NEC was highest. Projected total scan time to achieve NEC-density that matches current clinical practice in a typical oncology exam averaged 9, 15, 24, and 61 min for the 8-, 6-, 4-, and 2-block ring systems, when using optimal collimation. Increasing the AFOV should provide a greater than proportional increase in NEC, potentially benefiting patient throughput-to-cost ratio. Conversely, by using appropriate collimation, a two-ring (7.8 cm AFOV) system could acquire whole-body scans achieving NEC-density levels comparable to current standards within long, but feasible, scan times.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21610291      PMCID: PMC3148837          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/56/12/011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  7 in total

1.  Parametric Design Study of a Long Axial Field-of-View PET Scanner using a Block-Detector Tomograph Simulation of a Cylindrical Phantom.

Authors:  William C J Hunter; Robert L Harrison; Steven B Gillispie; Lawrence R Macdonald; Thomas K Lewellen
Journal:  IEEE Nucl Sci Symp Conf Rec (1997)       Date:  2009-10-24

Review 2.  Positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Gerd Muehllehner; Joel S Karp
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-06-20       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Optimization of noise equivalent count rate performance for a partially collimated PET scanner by varying the number of septa.

Authors:  Ruth E Schmitz; Robert L Harrison; Charles W Stearns; Thomas K Lewellen; Paul E Kinahan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  Image Reconstruction for a Partially Collimated Whole Body PET Scanner.

Authors:  Adam M Alessio; Ruth E Schmitz; Lawrence R Macdonald; Scott D Wollenweber; Charles W Stearns; Steven G Ross; Alex Ganin; Thomas K Lewellen; Paul E Kinahan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.679

5.  Estimating Live-Time for New PET Scanner Configurations.

Authors:  Lawrence R Macdonald; Ruth E Schmitz; Adam M Alessio; Robert L Harrison; Thomas K Lewellen; Paul E Kinahan
Journal:  IEEE Nucl Sci Symp Conf Rec (1997)       Date:  2007

6.  Measured count-rate performance of the Discovery STE PET/CT scanner in 2D, 3D and partial collimation acquisition modes.

Authors:  L R Macdonald; R E Schmitz; A M Alessio; S D Wollenweber; C W Stearns; A Ganin; R L Harrison; T K Lewellen; P E Kinahan
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-06-23       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Optimizing injected dose in clinical PET by accurately modeling the counting-rate response functions specific to individual patient scans.

Authors:  Charles C Watson; Michael E Casey; Bernard Bendriem; Jonathan P Carney; David W Townsend; Stefan Eberl; Steve Meikle; Frank P Difilippo
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 10.057

  7 in total
  10 in total

1.  Theoretical study of the benefit of long axial field-of-view PET on region of interest quantification.

Authors:  Xuezhu Zhang; Ramsey D Badawi; Simon R Cherry; Jinyi Qi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Development and Evaluation of mini-EXPLORER: A Long Axial Field-of-View PET Scanner for Nonhuman Primate Imaging.

Authors:  Eric Berg; Xuezhu Zhang; Julien Bec; Martin S Judenhofer; Brijesh Patel; Qiyu Peng; Maciej Kapusta; Matthias Schmand; Michael E Casey; Alice F Tarantal; Jinyi Qi; Ramsey D Badawi; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Impact of detector design on imaging performance of a long axial field-of-view, whole-body PET scanner.

Authors:  S Surti; J S Karp
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 4.  Total-Body PET: Maximizing Sensitivity to Create New Opportunities for Clinical Research and Patient Care.

Authors:  Simon R Cherry; Terry Jones; Joel S Karp; Jinyi Qi; William W Moses; Ramsey D Badawi
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Optimal whole-body PET scanner configurations for different volumes of LSO scintillator: a simulation study.

Authors:  Jonathan K Poon; Magnus L Dahlbom; William W Moses; Karthik Balakrishnan; Wenli Wang; Simon R Cherry; Ramsey D Badawi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Performance evaluation of the 5-Ring GE Discovery MI PET/CT system using the national electrical manufacturers association NU 2-2012 Standard.

Authors:  Tinsu Pan; Samuel A Einstein; Srinivas Cheenu Kappadath; Kira S Grogg; Cristina Lois Gomez; Adam M Alessio; William C Hunter; Georges El Fakhri; Paul E Kinahan; Osama R Mawlawi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Parallax error in long-axial field-of-view PET scanners-a simulation study.

Authors:  Jeffrey P Schmall; Joel S Karp; Matt Werner; Suleman Surti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Study of PET scanner designs using clinical metrics to optimize the scanner axial FOV and crystal thickness.

Authors:  S Surti; M E Werner; J S Karp
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Performance Evaluation of the uEXPLORER Total-Body PET/CT Scanner Based on NEMA NU 2-2018 with Additional Tests to Characterize PET Scanners with a Long Axial Field of View.

Authors:  Benjamin A Spencer; Eric Berg; Jeffrey P Schmall; Negar Omidvari; Edwin K Leung; Yasser G Abdelhafez; Songsong Tang; Zilin Deng; Yun Dong; Yang Lv; Jun Bao; Weiping Liu; Hongdi Li; Terry Jones; Ramsey D Badawi; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  Recommendations for Standardizing Thorax PET-CT in Non-Human Primates by Recent Experience from Macaque Studies.

Authors:  Marieke A Stammes; Jaco Bakker; Richard A W Vervenne; Dian G M Zijlmans; Leo van Geest; Michel P M Vierboom; Jan A M Langermans; Frank A W Verreck
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 2.752

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.