Literature DB >> 29799814

Theoretical study of the benefit of long axial field-of-view PET on region of interest quantification.

Xuezhu Zhang1, Ramsey D Badawi, Simon R Cherry, Jinyi Qi.   

Abstract

The aim of this study is to evaluate the benefit of long axial field-of-view (AFOV) PET scanners on region of interest (ROI) quantification. We simulated a series of PET scanners with an AFOV ranging from 22 cm to 220 cm. A theoretical framework was used to predict the contrast recovery coefficient (CRC) and the variance of ROI quantification in penalized maximum likelihood (ML) image reconstruction, in which the resolution and noise tradeoff was controlled by a regularization parameter with a quadratic penalty function. The characterization was based on the converged penalized ML reconstruction with an accurate system model. We examined quantification of a 2 mm ROI and 10 mm ROI in a clinically relevant scan range of 110 cm. Multiple bed positions with 50% overlap were used for scanners with shorter AFOV to provide a relatively uniform sensitivity across the 110 cm axial range. A uniform water cylinder of 20 cm in diameter and 230 cm in length was chosen to model the attenuation and background activity. We computed the variance reduction factor at fixed resolution. Effects of different detector capabilities, including TOF (time-of-flight) resolution (320 ps, 500 ps, and non-TOF) and DOI (depth-of-interaction) resolution (4 mm, 10 mm, and no DOI), were evaluated. The results show that at a normal activity level (370 MBq), the 220 cm AFOV scanner offers a  ∼17-fold variance reduction for the 2 mm ROI and  ∼26-fold variance reduction for the 10 mm ROI (both measured at CRC  =  0.5) over the 22 cm AFOV scanner when both using detectors with 500 ps TOF resolution no DOI capability. The variance reduction factors of trues-only are higher than those of including scatters and randoms. Combining 320 ps TOF and 4 mm DOI, the 220 cm long scanner offers a  ∼45-fold variance reduction over the 22 cm long reference scanner (500 ps TOF, no DOI) for imaging 2 mm and 10 mm ROIs. The variance reduction factors are higher at a lower activity level due to lower random fraction. In conclusion, our study demonstrates that a long AFOV scanner can greatly improve the quantitative accuracy of PET imaging compared to current state-of-the-art clinical PET scanners.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29799814      PMCID: PMC6097617          DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aac815

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  21 in total

1.  A theoretical study of the contrast recovery and variance of MAP reconstructions from PET data.

Authors:  J Qi; R M Leahy
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Resolution and noise properties of MAP reconstruction for fully 3-D PET.

Authors:  J Qi; R M Leahy
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 3.  In vivo molecular and genomic imaging: new challenges for imaging physics.

Authors:  Simon R Cherry
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2004-02-07       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Development and evaluation of a LOR-based image reconstruction with 3D system response modeling for a PET insert with dual-layer offset crystal design.

Authors:  Xuezhu Zhang; Greg Stortz; Vesna Sossi; Christopher J Thompson; Fabrice Retière; Piotr Kozlowski; Jonathan D Thiessen; Andrew L Goertzen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Effective count rates for PET scanners with reduced and extended axial field of view.

Authors:  L R MacDonald; R L Harrison; A M Alessio; W C J Hunter; T K Lewellen; P E Kinahan
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Impact of detector design on imaging performance of a long axial field-of-view, whole-body PET scanner.

Authors:  S Surti; J S Karp
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Quantitative image reconstruction for total-body PET imaging using the 2-meter long EXPLORER scanner.

Authors:  Xuezhu Zhang; Jian Zhou; Simon R Cherry; Ramsey D Badawi; Jinyi Qi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 8.  Total-body imaging: Transforming the role of positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Simon R Cherry; Ramsey D Badawi; Joel S Karp; William W Moses; Pat Price; Terry Jones
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 17.956

9.  4D XCAT phantom for multimodality imaging research.

Authors:  W P Segars; G Sturgeon; S Mendonca; Jason Grimes; B M W Tsui
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Optimal whole-body PET scanner configurations for different volumes of LSO scintillator: a simulation study.

Authors:  Jonathan K Poon; Magnus L Dahlbom; William W Moses; Karthik Balakrishnan; Wenli Wang; Simon R Cherry; Ramsey D Badawi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 3.609

View more
  4 in total

1.  The feasibility of ultralow-activity 18F-FDG dynamic PET imaging in lung adenocarcinoma patients through total-body PET/CT scanner.

Authors:  Jing Lv; Hongyan Yin; Haojun Yu; Guobing Liu; Hongcheng Shi
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 2.258

2.  An encoder-decoder network for direct image reconstruction on sinograms of a long axial field of view PET.

Authors:  Ruiyao Ma; Jiaxi Hu; Hasan Sari; Song Xue; Clemens Mingels; Marco Viscione; Venkata Sai Sundar Kandarpa; Wei Bo Li; Dimitris Visvikis; Rui Qiu; Axel Rominger; Junli Li; Kuangyu Shi
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Total-Body Dynamic Reconstruction and Parametric Imaging on the uEXPLORER.

Authors:  Xuezhu Zhang; Zhaoheng Xie; Eric Berg; Martin S Judenhofer; Weiping Liu; Tianyi Xu; Yu Ding; Yang Lv; Yun Dong; Zilin Deng; Songsong Tang; Hongcheng Shi; Pengcheng Hu; Shuguang Chen; Jun Bao; Hongdi Li; Jian Zhou; Guobao Wang; Simon R Cherry; Ramsey D Badawi; Jinyi Qi
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2019-07-13       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 4.  Total-body PET/CT - First Clinical Experiences and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Quinn Kwan-Tai Ng; Elizabeth Katherine Anna Triumbari; Negar Omidvari; Simon R Cherry; Ramsey D Badawi; Lorenzo Nardo
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 4.802

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.