Literature DB >> 23654387

Latency of tone-burst-evoked auditory brain stem responses and otoacoustic emissions: level, frequency, and rise-time effects.

Daniel M Rasetshwane1, Michael Argenyi, Stephen T Neely, Judy G Kopun, Michael P Gorga.   

Abstract

Simultaneous measurement of auditory brain stem response (ABR) and otoacoustic emission (OAE) delays may provide insights into effects of level, frequency, and stimulus rise-time on cochlear delay. Tone-burst-evoked ABRs and OAEs (TBOAEs) were measured simultaneously in normal-hearing human subjects. Stimuli included a wide range of frequencies (0.5-8 kHz), levels (20-90 dB SPL), and tone-burst rise times. ABR latencies have orderly dependence on these three parameters, similar to previously reported data by Gorga et al. [J. Speech Hear. Res. 31, 87-97 (1988)]. Level dependence of ABR and TBOAE latencies was similar across a wide range of stimulus conditions. At mid-frequencies, frequency dependence of ABR and TBOAE latencies were similar. The dependence of ABR latency on both rise time and level was significant; however, the interaction was not significant, suggesting independent effects. Comparison between ABR and TBOAE latencies reveals that the ratio of TBOAE latency to ABR forward latency (the level-dependent component of ABR total latency) is close to one below 1.5 kHz, but greater than two above 1.5 kHz. Despite the fact that the current experiment was designed to test compatibility with models of reverse-wave propagation, existing models do not completely explain the current data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23654387      PMCID: PMC3663861          DOI: 10.1121/1.4798666

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  38 in total

1.  Inverse solution of ear-canal area function from reflectance.

Authors:  Daniel M Rasetshwane; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Comparison between otoacoustic and auditory brainstem response latencies supports slow backward propagation of otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Arturo Moleti; Renata Sisto
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Supporting evidence for reverse cochlear traveling waves.

Authors:  W Dong; E S Olson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Testing coherent reflection in chinchilla: Auditory-nerve responses predict stimulus-frequency emissions.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; Arnold Tubis; Carrick L Talmadge
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Modeling auditory evoked brainstem responses to transient stimuli.

Authors:  Filip Munch Rønne; Torsten Dau; James Harte; Claus Elberling
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Comparison of cochlear delay estimates using otoacoustic emissions and auditory brainstem responses.

Authors:  James M Harte; Gilles Pigasse; Torsten Dau
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Distortion products and backward-traveling waves in nonlinear active models of the cochlea.

Authors:  Renata Sisto; Arturo Moleti; Teresa Botti; Daniele Bertaccini; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Breaking away: violation of distortion emission phase-frequency invariance at low frequencies.

Authors:  Sumitrajit Dhar; Abigail Rogers; Carolina Abdala
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Distribution of standing-wave errors in real-ear sound-level measurements.

Authors:  Susan A Richmond; Judy G Kopun; Stephen T Neely; Hongyang Tan; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Otoacoustic estimation of cochlear tuning: validation in the chinchilla.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; John J Guinan; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-05-04
View more
  11 in total

1.  Functional modeling of the human auditory brainstem response to broadband stimulation.

Authors:  Sarah Verhulst; Hari M Bharadwaj; Golbarg Mehraei; Christopher A Shera; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Tuning of SFOAEs Evoked by Low-Frequency Tones Is Not Compatible with Localized Emission Generation.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-03-27

3.  The effect of stimulus bandwidth on the nonlinear-derived tone-burst-evoked otoacoustic emission.

Authors:  James D Lewis; Shawn S Goodman
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-09-23

4.  Basal contributions to short-latency transient-evoked otoacoustic emission components.

Authors:  James D Lewis; Shawn S Goodman
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-10-11

5.  Tone-burst auditory brainstem response wave V latencies in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired ears.

Authors:  James D Lewis; Judy Kopun; Stephen T Neely; Kendra K Schmid; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Relating the Variability of Tone-Burst Otoacoustic Emission and Auditory Brainstem Response Latencies to the Underlying Cochlear Mechanics.

Authors:  Sarah Verhulst; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  AIP Conf Proc       Date:  2015-12-31

7.  Between-ear sound frequency disparity modulates a brain stem biomarker of binaural hearing.

Authors:  Andrew D Brown; Kelsey L Anbuhl; Jesse I Gilmer; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  A simple algorithm for objective threshold determination of auditory brainstem responses.

Authors:  Kirupa Suthakar; M Charles Liberman
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Using Thresholds in Noise to Identify Hidden Hearing Loss in Humans.

Authors:  Courtney L Ridley; Judy G Kopun; Stephen T Neely; Michael P Gorga; Daniel M Rasetshwane
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Reliability and clinical test performance of cochlear reflectance.

Authors:  Daniel M Rasetshwane; Sara E Fultz; Judy G Kopun; Michael P Gorga; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.