Literature DB >> 25245497

The effect of stimulus bandwidth on the nonlinear-derived tone-burst-evoked otoacoustic emission.

James D Lewis1, Shawn S Goodman.   

Abstract

Intermodulation distortion has been hypothesized as a mechanism contributing to the generation of short-latency (SL) components in the transient-evoked otoacoustic emission (TEOAE). Presumably, nonlinear interactions between the frequency components within the evoking stimulus induce cochlear distortion products, which mix in the cochlea and ear canal with reflected energy from each stimulus-frequency's tonotopic place. The mixing of these different components is evidenced in the bandpass-filtered emission waveform as a series of different latency peaks. The current study tested the hypothesis that intermodulation distortion, induced within the spectral bandwidth of the evoking stimulus, is the primary mechanism through which the SL components are generated. The nonlinear-derived tone-burst-evoked OAE (TBOAEnl) was evoked using 2-kHz tone bursts with durations of 3, 6, 12, and 24 cycles. As tone burst duration doubled, the spectral bandwidth was halved. It was hypothesized that contributions to the TBOAEnl from SL components would decrease as tone burst duration increased and spectral bandwidth decreased, if the SL components were generated through intermodulation distortion. Despite differences in spectral bandwidth between the evoking stimuli, the latencies and magnitudes of the different latency components between the 3- and 6-cycle TBOAEnl were comparable. The 12- and 24-cycle TBOAEnl envelopes were characteristic of destructive phase interactions between different latency components overlapping in time. The different latency components in the 3- and 6-cycle TBOAEnl introduced a characteristic level dependency to TBOAEnl magnitude and latency when analyzed across a broad time window spanning the different components. A similar dependency described the 12- and 24-cycle TBOAEnl input/output and latency-intensity functions, suggesting that the SL components evident in the shorter-duration TBOAEnl equally contributed to the longer-duration TBOAEnl, despite reductions in spectral bandwidth. The similarity between the different TBOAEnl suggests that they share a common generation mechanism and casts doubt on intermodulation distortion as the generation mechanism of SL TEOAE components in humans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25245497      PMCID: PMC4389961          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-014-0484-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  46 in total

1.  Enhancement of the transient-evoked otoacoustic emission produced by the addition of a pure tone in the guinea pig.

Authors:  R H Withnell; G K Yates
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Double-evoked otoacoustic emissions. II. Intermittent noise rejection, calibration and ear-canal measurements.

Authors:  D H Keefe; R Ling
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Experimental confirmation of the two-source interference model for the fine structure of distortion product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  C L Talmadge; G R Long; A Tubis; S Dhar
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 4.  Evoked otoacoustic emissions arise by two fundamentally different mechanisms: a taxonomy for mammalian OAEs.

Authors:  C A Shera; J J Guinan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Basilar-membrane responses to clicks at the base of the chinchilla cochlea.

Authors:  A Recio; N C Rich; S S Narayan; M A Ruggero
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Time-frequency distributions of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  G Tognola; F Grandori; P Ravazzani
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Latency of auditory brain-stem responses and otoacoustic emissions using tone-burst stimuli.

Authors:  S T Neely; S J Norton; M P Gorga; W Jesteadt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Latency and multiple sources of distortion product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  L J Stover; S T Neely; M P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions and high-frequency acoustic trauma in the guinea pig.

Authors:  P Avan; P Bonfils; D Loth; M Elbez; M Erminy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Click- and tone-burst-evoked otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired ears.

Authors:  B A Prieve; M P Gorga; S T Neely
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  5 in total

1.  Comparisons of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions using chirp and click stimuli.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe; M Patrick Feeney; Lisa L Hunter; Denis F Fitzpatrick
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Basal contributions to short-latency transient-evoked otoacoustic emission components.

Authors:  James D Lewis; Shawn S Goodman
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-10-11

3.  Stimulus Frequency Otoacoustic Emission Delays and Generating Mechanisms in Guinea Pigs, Chinchillas, and Simulations.

Authors:  Maria A Berezina-Greene; John J Guinan
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-09-15

4.  Reflection-Source Emissions Evoked with Clicks and Frequency Sweeps: Comparisons Across Levels.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-10-04

5.  Otoacoustic emissions from ears with spontaneous activity behave differently to those without: Stronger responses to tone bursts as well as to clicks.

Authors:  W Wiktor Jedrzejczak; Krzysztof Kochanek; Henryk Skarzynski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.