Literature DB >> 21568416

Distribution of standing-wave errors in real-ear sound-level measurements.

Susan A Richmond1, Judy G Kopun, Stephen T Neely, Hongyang Tan, Michael P Gorga.   

Abstract

Standing waves can cause measurement errors when sound-pressure level (SPL) measurements are performed in a closed ear canal, e.g., during probe-microphone system calibration for distortion-product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) testing. Alternative calibration methods, such as forward-pressure level (FPL), minimize the influence of standing waves by calculating the forward-going sound waves separate from the reflections that cause errors. Previous research compared test performance (Burke et al., 2010) and threshold prediction (Rogers et al., 2010) using SPL and multiple FPL calibration conditions, and surprisingly found no significant improvements when using FPL relative to SPL, except at 8 kHz. The present study examined the calibration data collected by Burke et al. and Rogers et al. from 155 human subjects in order to describe the frequency location and magnitude of standing-wave pressure minima to see if these errors might explain trends in test performance. Results indicate that while individual results varied widely, pressure variability was larger around 4 kHz and smaller at 8 kHz, consistent with the dimensions of the adult ear canal. The present data suggest that standing-wave errors are not responsible for the historically poor (8 kHz) or good (4 kHz) performance of DPOAE measures at specific test frequencies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21568416      PMCID: PMC3108394          DOI: 10.1121/1.3569726

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  17 in total

1.  Influence of calibration method on distortion-product otoacoustic emission measurements: II. threshold prediction.

Authors:  Abigail R Rogers; Sienna R Burke; Judy G Kopun; Hongyang Tan; Stephen T Neely; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Influence of calibration method on distortion-product otoacoustic emission measurements: I. test performance.

Authors:  Sienna R Burke; Abigail R Rogers; Stephen T Neely; Judy G Kopun; Hongyang Tan; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Distortion-product otoacoustic emission measured with continuously varying stimulus level.

Authors:  Stephen T Neely; Tiffany A Johnson; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Influence of primary-level and primary-frequency ratios on human distortion product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Tiffany A Johnson; Stephen T Neely; Cassie A Garner; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  An in situ calibration for hearing thresholds.

Authors:  Robert H Withnell; Patricia S Jeng; Kelly Waldvogel; Kari Morgenstein; Jont B Allen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Comparison of in-situ calibration methods for quantifying input to the middle ear.

Authors:  James D Lewis; Ryan W McCreery; Stephen T Neely; Patricia G Stelmachowicz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Distortion product otoacoustic emission test of sensorineural hearing loss: performance regarding sensitivity, specificity and receiver operating characteristics.

Authors:  D O Kim; J Paparello; M D Jung; J Smurzynski; X Sun
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 1.494

8.  From laboratory to clinic: a large scale study of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in ears with normal hearing and ears with hearing loss.

Authors:  M P Gorga; S T Neely; B Ohlrich; B Hoover; J Redner; J Peters
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Clinical test performance of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions using new stimulus conditions.

Authors:  Tiffany A Johnson; Stephen T Neely; Judy G Kopun; Darcia M Dierking; Hongyang Tan; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Influence of in situ, sound-level calibration on distortion-product otoacoustic emission variability.

Authors:  Rachel A Scheperle; Stephen T Neely; Judy G Kopun; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  11 in total

1.  Further assessment of forward pressure level for in situ calibration.

Authors:  Rachel A Scheperle; Shawn S Goodman; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Relation of distortion-product otoacoustic emission input-output functions to loudness.

Authors:  Daniel M Rasetshwane; Stephen T Neely; Judy G Kopun; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Comparing otoacoustic emissions evoked by chirp transients with constant absorbed sound power and constant incident pressure magnitude.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe; M Patrick Feeney; Lisa L Hunter; Denis F Fitzpatrick
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Compensating for ear-canal acoustics when measuring otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Effects of Forward- and Emitted-Pressure Calibrations on the Variability of Otoacoustic Emission Measurements Across Repeated Probe Fits.

Authors:  Tom Maxim; Christopher A Shera; Karolina K Charaziak; Carolina Abdala
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Latency of tone-burst-evoked auditory brain stem responses and otoacoustic emissions: level, frequency, and rise-time effects.

Authors:  Daniel M Rasetshwane; Michael Argenyi; Stephen T Neely; Judy G Kopun; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Using Thresholds in Noise to Identify Hidden Hearing Loss in Humans.

Authors:  Courtney L Ridley; Judy G Kopun; Stephen T Neely; Michael P Gorga; Daniel M Rasetshwane
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Multi-tone suppression of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in humans.

Authors:  Nicole E Sieck; Daniel M Rasetshwane; Judy G Kopun; Walt Jesteadt; Michael P Gorga; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Effect of calibration method on distortion-product otoacoustic emission measurements at and around 4 kHz.

Authors:  Michal L Reuven; Stephen T Neely; Judy G Kopun; Daniel M Rasetshwane; Jont B Allen; Hongyang Tan; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Reliability of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions and their relation to loudness.

Authors:  Megan J Thorson; Judy G Kopun; Stephen T Neely; Hongyang Tan; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.482

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.