Literature DB >> 21568414

Breaking away: violation of distortion emission phase-frequency invariance at low frequencies.

Sumitrajit Dhar1, Abigail Rogers, Carolina Abdala.   

Abstract

The phase versus frequency function of the distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) at 2f(1) - f(2) is approximately invariant at frequencies above 1.5 kHz in human subjects when recorded with a constant f(2)/f(1). However, a secular break from this invariance has been observed at lower frequencies where the phase-gradient becomes markedly steeper. Apical DPOAEs, such as 2f(1) - f(2), are known to contain contributions from multiple sources. This experiment asked whether the phase behavior of the ear canal DPOAE at low frequencies is driven by the phase of the component from the distortion product (DP) region at 2f(1) - f(2), which exhibits rapid phase accumulation. Placing a suppressor tone close in the frequency to 2f(1) - f(2) reduced the contribution of this component to the ear canal DPOAE in normal-hearing adult human ears. When the contribution of this component was reduced, the phase behavior of the ear canal DPOAE was not altered, suggesting that the breaking from DPOAE phase invariance at low frequencies is an outcome of apical-basal differences in cochlear mechanics. The deviation from DPOAE phase invariance appears to be a manifestation of the breaking from approximate scaling symmetry in the human cochlear apex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21568414      PMCID: PMC3108392          DOI: 10.1121/1.3569732

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  37 in total

1.  Measurements of human middle ear forward and reverse acoustics: implications for otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Sunil Puria
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Multiple internal reflections in the cochlea and their effect on DPOAE fine structure.

Authors:  Sumitrajit Dhar; Carrick L Talmadge; Glenis R Long; Arnold Tubis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Otoacoustic estimation of cochlear tuning: validation in the chinchilla.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; John J Guinan; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-05-04

4.  The evoked cochlear mechanical response and the auditory microstructure - evidence for a new element in cochlear mechanics.

Authors:  D T Kemp
Journal:  Scand Audiol Suppl       Date:  1979

5.  Tails of tuning curves of auditory-nerve fibers.

Authors:  N Y Kiang; E C Moxon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Sources of DPOAEs revealed by suppression experiments, inverse fast Fourier transforms, and SFOAEs in impaired ears.

Authors:  Dawn Konrad-Martin; Stephen T Neely; Douglas H Keefe; Patricia A Dorn; Emily Cyr; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Basilar membrane motion.

Authors:  G Zweig
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  1976

8.  Auditory-nerve response from cats raised in a low-noise chamber.

Authors:  M C Liberman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Observations of the vibration of the basilar membrane in squirrel monkeys using the Mössbauer technique.

Authors:  W S Rhode
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1971-04       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Stimulus-frequency-emission group delay: a test of coherent reflection filtering and a window on cochlear tuning.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; John J Guinan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  17 in total

1.  Age Effects on Cochlear Reflectance in Adults.

Authors:  Sara E Fultz; Kenneth I Vaden; Daniel M Rasetshwane; Judy G Kopun; Stephen T Neely; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Tuning of SFOAEs Evoked by Low-Frequency Tones Is Not Compatible with Localized Emission Generation.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-03-27

3.  Latency of tone-burst-evoked auditory brain stem responses and otoacoustic emissions: level, frequency, and rise-time effects.

Authors:  Daniel M Rasetshwane; Michael Argenyi; Stephen T Neely; Judy G Kopun; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Maturation and aging of the human cochlea: a view through the DPOAE looking glass.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-04-03

5.  Basal contributions to short-latency transient-evoked otoacoustic emission components.

Authors:  James D Lewis; Shawn S Goodman
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-10-11

6.  Deviations from Scaling Symmetry in the Apical Half of the Human Cochlea.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Sumitrajit Dhar; Radha Kalluri
Journal:  AIP Conf Proc       Date:  2011-11-07

7.  Frequency shifts in distortion-product otoacoustic emissions evoked by swept tones.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; Carolina Abdala
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Distortion-Product Otoacoustic Emission Measured Below 300 Hz in Normal-Hearing Human Subjects.

Authors:  Anders T Christensen; Rodrigo Ordoñez; Dorte Hammershøi
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-11-21

9.  Towards a joint reflection-distortion otoacoustic emission profile: Results in normal and impaired ears.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Radha Kalluri
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Relationship Between Behavioral and Stimulus Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions Delay-Based Tuning Estimates.

Authors:  Uzma Shaheen Wilson; Jenna Browning-Kamins; Sriram Boothalingam; Arturo Moleti; Renata Sisto; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 2.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.