Literature DB >> 27175040

Relating the Variability of Tone-Burst Otoacoustic Emission and Auditory Brainstem Response Latencies to the Underlying Cochlear Mechanics.

Sarah Verhulst1, Christopher A Shera2.   

Abstract

Forward and reverse cochlear latency and its relation to the frequency tuning of the auditory filters can be assessed using tone bursts (TBs). Otoacoustic emissions (TBOAEs) estimate the cochlear roundtrip time, while auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) to the same stimuli aim at measuring the auditory filter buildup time. Latency ratios are generally close to two and controversy exists about the relationship of this ratio to cochlear mechanics. We explored why the two methods provide different estimates of filter buildup time, and ratios with large inter-subject variability, using a time-domain model for OAEs and ABRs. We compared latencies for twenty models, in which all parameters but the cochlear irregularities responsible for reflection-source OAEs were identical, and found that TBOAE latencies were much more variable than ABR latencies. Multiple reflection-sources generated within the evoking stimulus bandwidth were found to shape the TBOAE envelope and complicate the interpretation of TBOAE latency and TBOAE/ABR ratios in terms of auditory filter tuning.

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 27175040      PMCID: PMC4862599          DOI: 10.1063/1.4939401

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AIP Conf Proc        ISSN: 0094-243X


  18 in total

1.  The importance of cochlear processing for the formation of auditory brainstem and frequency following responses.

Authors:  Torsten Dau
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Transient-evoked otoacoustic emission generators in a nonlinear cochlea.

Authors:  Arturo Moleti; Teresa Botti; Renata Sisto
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  A phenomenological model of peripheral and central neural responses to amplitude-modulated tones.

Authors:  Paul C Nelson; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Testing coherent reflection in chinchilla: Auditory-nerve responses predict stimulus-frequency emissions.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; Arnold Tubis; Carrick L Talmadge
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Modeling auditory evoked brainstem responses to transient stimuli.

Authors:  Filip Munch Rønne; Torsten Dau; James Harte; Claus Elberling
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Nonlinear time-domain cochlear model for transient stimulation and human otoacoustic emission.

Authors:  Sarah Verhulst; Torsten Dau; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Measurements of wide-band cochlear reflectance in humans.

Authors:  Daniel M Rasetshwane; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-06-12

8.  A phenomenological model of the synapse between the inner hair cell and auditory nerve: long-term adaptation with power-law dynamics.

Authors:  Muhammad S A Zilany; Ian C Bruce; Paul C Nelson; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Reconciling the origin of the transient evoked ototacoustic emission in humans.

Authors:  Robert H Withnell; Chantel Hazlewood; Amber Knowlton
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  High-frequency click-evoked otoacoustic emissions and behavioral thresholds in humans.

Authors:  Shawn S Goodman; Denis F Fitzpatrick; John C Ellison; Walt Jesteadt; Douglas H Keefe
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.