Literature DB >> 31314646

Between-ear sound frequency disparity modulates a brain stem biomarker of binaural hearing.

Andrew D Brown1, Kelsey L Anbuhl2, Jesse I Gilmer3,4, Daniel J Tollin3,4,5.   

Abstract

The auditory brain stem response (ABR) is an evoked potential that indexes a cascade of neural events elicited by sound. In the present study we evaluated the influence of sound frequency on a derived component of the ABR known as the binaural interaction component (BIC). Specifically, we evaluated the effect of acoustic interaural (between-ear) frequency mismatch on BIC amplitude. Goals were to 1) increase basic understanding of sound features that influence this long-studied auditory potential and 2) gain insight about the persistence of the BIC with interaural electrode mismatch in human users of bilateral cochlear implants, presently a limitation on the prospective utility of the BIC in audiological settings. Data were collected in an animal model that is audiometrically similar to humans, the chinchilla (Chinchilla lanigera; 6 females). Frequency disparities and amplitudes of acoustic stimuli were varied over broad ranges, and associated variation of BIC amplitude was quantified. Subsequently, responses were simulated with the use of established models of the brain stem pathway thought to underlie the BIC. Collectively, the data demonstrate that at high sound intensities (≥85 dB SPL), the acoustically elicited BIC persisted with interaurally disparate stimulation (click frequencies ≥1.5 octaves apart). However, sharper tuning emerged at moderate sound intensities (65 dB SPL), with the largest BIC occurring for stimulus frequencies within ~0.8 octaves, equivalent to ±1 mm in cochlear place. Such responses were consistent with simulated responses of the presumed brain stem generator of the BIC, the lateral superior olive. The data suggest that leveraging focused electrical stimulation strategies could improve BIC-based bilateral cochlear implant fitting outcomes.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Traditional hearing tests evaluate each ear independently. Diagnosis and treatment of binaural hearing dysfunction remains a basic challenge for hearing clinicians. We demonstrate in an animal model that the prospective utility of a noninvasive electrophysiological signature of binaural function, the binaural interaction component (BIC), depends strongly on the intensity of auditory stimulation. Data suggest that more informative BIC measurements could be obtained with clinical protocols leveraging stimuli restricted in effective bandwidth.

Entities:  

Keywords:  auditory brain stem response; binaural hearing; binaural interaction; cochlear implants

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31314646      PMCID: PMC6766741          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00057.2019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  58 in total

Review 1.  The lateral superior olive: a functional role in sound source localization.

Authors:  Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 7.519

2.  Interaural delay-dependent changes in the binaural difference potential in cat auditory brainstem response: implications about the origin of the binaural interaction component.

Authors:  P Ungan; S Yağcioğlu; B Ozmen
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Preliminary results of the relationship between the binaural interaction component of the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response and interaural pitch comparisons in bilateral cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Shuman He; Carolyn J Brown; Paul J Abbas
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Objective Measures of Neural Processing of Interaural Time Differences.

Authors:  David McAlpine; Nicholas Haywood; Jaime Undurraga; Torsten Marquardt
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.622

5.  A frequency-position map for the chinchilla cochlea.

Authors:  D H Eldredge; J D Miller; B A Bohne
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  A comparison of the effects of isoflurane and ketamine anesthesia on auditory brainstem response (ABR) thresholds in rats.

Authors:  M R Ruebhausen; T J Brozoski; C A Bauer
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 7.  Estimation of the pure-tone audiogram by the auditory brainstem response: a review.

Authors:  D R Stapells; P Oates
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  1997 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.854

8.  Effects of stimulation level and electrode pairing on the binaural interaction component of the electrically evoked auditory brain stem response.

Authors:  Shuman He; Carolyn J Brown; Paul J Abbas
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Binaural release from masking for a speech sound in infants, preschoolers, and adults.

Authors:  R J Nozza; E F Wagner; M A Crandell
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1988-06

10.  Cochlear Implant Stimulation of a Hearing Ear Generates Separate Electrophonic and Electroneural Responses.

Authors:  Mika Sato; Peter Baumhoff; Andrej Kral
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  3 in total

1.  Sensitivity to Envelope Interaural Time Differences: Modeling Auditory Modulation Filtering.

Authors:  Andrew Brughera; Jimena A Ballestero; David McAlpine
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-11-05

2.  Normative Study of the Binaural Interaction Component of the Human Auditory Brainstem Response as a Function of Interaural Time Differences.

Authors:  Carol A Sammeth; Nathaniel T Greene; Andrew D Brown; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.562

3.  Simulation of ITD-Dependent Single-Neuron Responses Under Electrical Stimulation and with Amplitude-Modulated Acoustic Stimuli.

Authors:  Hongmei Hu; Jonas Klug; Mathias Dietz
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-03-25
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.