Literature DB >> 25303881

Basal contributions to short-latency transient-evoked otoacoustic emission components.

James D Lewis1, Shawn S Goodman.   

Abstract

The presence of short-latency (SL), less compressive-growing components in bandpass-filtered transient-evoked otoacoustic emission (TEOAE) waveforms may implicate contributions from cochlear regions basal to the tonotopic place. Recent empirical work suggests a region of SL generation between ∼1/5 and 1/10-octave basal to the TEOAE frequency's tonotopic place. However, this estimate may be biased to regions closer to the tonotopic place as the TEOAE extraction technique precluded measurement of components with latencies shorter than ∼5 ms. Using a variant of the non-linear, double-evoked extraction paradigm that permitted extraction of components with latencies as early as 1 ms, the current study empirically estimated the spatial-extent of the cochlear region contributing to 2 kHz SL TEOAE components. TEOAEs were evoked during simultaneous presentation of a suppressor stimulus, in order to suppress contributions to the TEOAE from different places along the cochlear partition. Three or four different-latency components of similar frequency content (∼2 kHz) were identified for most subjects. Component latencies ranged from 1.4 to 9.6 ms; latency was predictive of the component's growth rate and the suppressor frequency to which the component's magnitude was most sensitive to change. As component latency decreased, growth became less compressive and suppressor-frequency sensitivity shifted to higher frequencies. The shortest-latency components were most sensitive to suppressors approximately 3/5-octave higher than their nominal frequency of 2 kHz. These results are consistent with a distributed region of generation extending to approximately 3/5-octave basal to the TEOAE frequency's tonotopic place. The empirical estimates of TEOAE generation are similar to model-based estimates where generation of the different-latency components occurs through linear reflection from impedance discontinuities distributed across the cochlear partition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25303881      PMCID: PMC4310860          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-014-0493-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  57 in total

1.  Changes to low-frequency components of the TEOAE following acoustic trauma to the base of the cochlea.

Authors:  R H Withnell; G K Yates; D L Kirk
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  A phenomenological model for the responses of auditory-nerve fibers: I. Nonlinear tuning with compression and suppression.

Authors:  X Zhang; M G Heinz; I C Bruce; L H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and relaxation dynamics of long decay time OAEs in audiometrically normal and impaired subjects.

Authors:  R Sisto; A Moleti; M Lucertini
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 4.  Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea.

Authors:  L Robles; M A Ruggero
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 37.312

5.  Longitudinal pattern of basilar membrane vibration in the sensitive cochlea.

Authors:  Tianying Ren
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-12-02       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Effect of click intensity on click-evoked otoacoustic emission waveforms: implications for the origin of emissions.

Authors:  Sirley Carvalho; Béla Büki; Pierre Bonfils; Paul Avan
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Delays of stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions and cochlear vibrations contradict the theory of coherent reflection filtering.

Authors:  Jonathan H Siegel; Amanda J Cerka; Alberto Recio-Spinoso; Andrei N Temchin; Pim van Dijk; Mario A Ruggero
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Use of stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission latency and level to investigate cochlear mechanics in human ears.

Authors:  Kim S Schairer; John C Ellison; Denis Fitzpatrick; Douglas H Keefe
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  On the detection of early cochlear damage by otoacoustic emission analysis.

Authors:  M Lucertini; A Moleti; R Sisto
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  High-frequency click-evoked otoacoustic emissions and behavioral thresholds in humans.

Authors:  Shawn S Goodman; Denis F Fitzpatrick; John C Ellison; Walt Jesteadt; Douglas H Keefe
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  7 in total

1.  Comparisons of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions using chirp and click stimuli.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe; M Patrick Feeney; Lisa L Hunter; Denis F Fitzpatrick
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Stimulus Frequency Otoacoustic Emission Delays and Generating Mechanisms in Guinea Pigs, Chinchillas, and Simulations.

Authors:  Maria A Berezina-Greene; John J Guinan
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-09-15

3.  Efferent-induced alterations in distortion and reflection otoacoustic emissions in children.

Authors:  Srikanta K Mishra; Milan Biswal; Anup Amatya
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  The role of efferents in human auditory development: efferent inhibition predicts frequency discrimination in noise for children.

Authors:  Srikanta K Mishra
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Profiles of Stimulus-Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions from 0.5 to 20 kHz in Humans.

Authors:  James B Dewey; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-09-28

6.  Medial olivocochlear reflex effects on amplitude growth functions of long- and short-latency components of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions in humans.

Authors:  Shawn S Goodman; Sriram Boothalingam; Jeffery T Lichtenhan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Reflection-Source Emissions Evoked with Clicks and Frequency Sweeps: Comparisons Across Levels.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-10-04
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.