Literature DB >> 21568417

Distortion products and backward-traveling waves in nonlinear active models of the cochlea.

Renata Sisto1, Arturo Moleti, Teresa Botti, Daniele Bertaccini, Christopher A Shera.   

Abstract

This study explores the phenomenology of distortion products in nonlinear cochlear models, predicting their amplitude and phase along the basilar membrane. The existence of a backward-traveling wave at the distortion-product frequency, which has been recently questioned by experiments measuring the phase of basilar-membrane vibration, is discussed. The effect of different modeling choices is analyzed, including feed-forward asymmetry, micromechanical roughness, and breaking of scaling symmetry. The experimentally observed negative slope of basilar-membrane phase is predicted by numerical simulations of nonlinear cochlear models under a wide range of parameters and modeling choices. In active models, positive phase slopes are predicted by the quasi-linear analytical computations and by the fully nonlinear numerical simulations only if the distortion-product sources are localized apical to the observation point and if the stapes reflectivity is unrealistically small. The results of this study predict a negative phase slope whenever the source is distributed over a reasonably wide cochlear region and/or a reasonably high stapes reflectivity is assumed. Therefore, the above-mentioned experiments do not contradict "classical" models of cochlear mechanics and of distortion-product generation.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21568417      PMCID: PMC3324258          DOI: 10.1121/1.3569700

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  30 in total

1.  Modeling the combined effects of basilar membrane nonlinearity and roughness on stimulus frequency otoacoustic emission fine structure.

Authors:  C L Talmadge; A Tubis; G R Long; C Tong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Measurements of human middle ear forward and reverse acoustics: implications for otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Sunil Puria
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Mammalian spontaneous otoacoustic emissions are amplitude-stabilized cochlear standing waves.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Reverse propagation of sound in the gerbil cochlea.

Authors:  Tianying Ren
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-03-21       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Reflection of retrograde waves within the cochlea and at the stapes.

Authors:  C A Shera; G Zweig
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Finding the impedance of the organ of Corti.

Authors:  G Zweig
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  A cochlear frequency-position function for several species--29 years later.

Authors:  D D Greenwood
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Biophysics of the cochlea. II: Stationary nonlinear phenomenology.

Authors:  R Nobili; F Mammano
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Modeling otoacoustic emission and hearing threshold fine structures.

Authors:  C L Talmadge; A Tubis; G R Long; P Piskorski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Evidence for basal distortion-product otoacoustic emission components.

Authors:  Glen K Martin; Barden B Stagner; Brenda L Lonsbury-Martin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  9 in total

1.  Direction of wave propagation in the cochlea for internally excited basilar membrane.

Authors:  Yizeng Li; Karl Grosh
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Basilar-membrane interference patterns from multiple internal reflection of cochlear traveling waves.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; Nigel P Cooper
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Latency of tone-burst-evoked auditory brain stem responses and otoacoustic emissions: level, frequency, and rise-time effects.

Authors:  Daniel M Rasetshwane; Michael Argenyi; Stephen T Neely; Judy G Kopun; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Forward and Reverse Waves: Modeling Distortion Products in the Intracochlear Fluid Pressure.

Authors:  Thomas Bowling; Julien Meaud
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Inner hair cell stereocilia displacement in response to focal stimulation of the basilar membrane in the ex vivo gerbil cochlea.

Authors:  Aleksandrs Zosuls; Laura C Rupprecht; David C Mountain
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2021-10-22       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Hydromechanical Structure of the Cochlea Supports the Backward Traveling Wave in the Cochlea In Vivo.

Authors:  Fangyi Chen; Dingjun Zha; Xiaojie Yang; Allyn Hubbard; Alfred Nuttall
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 3.599

7.  Waves on Reissner's membrane: a mechanism for the propagation of otoacoustic emissions from the cochlea.

Authors:  Tobias Reichenbach; Aleksandra Stefanovic; Fumiaki Nin; A J Hudspeth
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 9.423

8.  Intracochlear distortion products are broadly generated by outer hair cells but their contributions to otoacoustic emissions are spatially restricted.

Authors:  Thomas Bowling; Haiqi Wen; Sebastiaan W F Meenderink; Wei Dong; Julien Meaud
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Basilar membrane vibration is not involved in the reverse propagation of otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  W He; T Ren
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.