Literature DB >> 26627795

Tone-burst auditory brainstem response wave V latencies in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired ears.

James D Lewis1, Judy Kopun1, Stephen T Neely1, Kendra K Schmid1, Michael P Gorga1.   

Abstract

The metric used to equate stimulus level [sound pressure level (SPL) or sensation level (SL)] between ears with normal hearing (NH) and ears with hearing loss (HL) in comparisons of auditory function can influence interpretation of results. When stimulus level is equated in dB SL, higher SPLs are presented to ears with HL due to their reduced sensitivity. As a result, it may be difficult to determine if differences between ears with NH and ears with HL are due to cochlear pathology or level-dependent changes in cochlear mechanics. To the extent that level-dependent changes in cochlear mechanics contribute to auditory brainstem response latencies, comparisons between normal and pathologic ears may depend on the stimulus levels at which comparisons are made. To test this hypothesis, wave V latencies were measured in 16 NH ears and 15 ears with mild-to-moderate HL. When stimulus levels were equated in SL, latencies were shorter in HL ears. However, latencies were similar for NH and HL ears when stimulus levels were equated in SPL. These observations demonstrate that the effect of stimulus level on wave V latency is large relative to the effect of HL, at least in cases of mild-to-moderate HL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26627795      PMCID: PMC4662677          DOI: 10.1121/1.4935516

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  61 in total

1.  Basilar membrane vibration in the basal turn of the sensitive gerbil cochlea.

Authors:  T Ren; A L Nuttall
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  The mechanical waveform of the basilar membrane. III. Intensity effects.

Authors:  E de Boer; A L Nuttall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Auditory brainstem responses with optimized chirp signals compensating basilar-membrane dispersion.

Authors:  T Dau; O Wegner; V Mellert; B Kollmeier
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Basilar membrane responses to broadband stimuli.

Authors:  A Recio; W S Rhode
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Study of mechanical motions in the basal region of the chinchilla cochlea.

Authors:  W S Rhode; A Recio
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Behavioural measurement of level-dependent shifts in the vibration pattern on the basilar membrane.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore; José I Alcántara; Brian R Glasberg
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  The human auditory brainstem response to high click rates: aging effects.

Authors:  R F Burkard; D Sims
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 1.493

8.  Temporal integration of sound pressure determines thresholds of auditory-nerve fibers.

Authors:  P Heil; H Neubauer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Alterations of basilar membrane response phase and velocity after acoustic overstimulation.

Authors:  Anders Fridberger; Jiefu Zheng; Alfred Nuttall
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Revised estimates of human cochlear tuning from otoacoustic and behavioral measurements.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; John J Guinan; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-02-26       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  9 in total

1.  Between-ear sound frequency disparity modulates a brain stem biomarker of binaural hearing.

Authors:  Andrew D Brown; Kelsey L Anbuhl; Jesse I Gilmer; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  A simple algorithm for objective threshold determination of auditory brainstem responses.

Authors:  Kirupa Suthakar; M Charles Liberman
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Macrostructural Changes of the Acoustic Radiation in Humans with Hearing Loss and Tinnitus Revealed with Fixel-Based Analysis.

Authors:  Elouise A Koops; Shereif Haykal; Pim van Dijk
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Optimizing non-invasive functional markers for cochlear deafferentation based on electrocochleography and auditory brainstem responses.

Authors:  Kelly C Harris; Jianxin Bao
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 2.482

5.  Individual Differences in Auditory Brainstem Response Wave Characteristics: Relations to Different Aspects of Peripheral Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Sarah Verhulst; Anoop Jagadeesh; Manfred Mauermann; Frauke Ernst
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 3.293

Review 6.  Auditory Brainstem Responses in Tinnitus: A Review of Who, How, and What?

Authors:  Victoria Milloy; Philippe Fournier; Daniel Benoit; Arnaud Noreña; Amineh Koravand
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 5.750

7.  Automatic Recognition of Auditory Brainstem Response Characteristic Waveform Based on Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory.

Authors:  Cheng Chen; Li Zhan; Xiaoxin Pan; Zhiliang Wang; Xiaoyu Guo; Handai Qin; Fen Xiong; Wei Shi; Min Shi; Fei Ji; Qiuju Wang; Ning Yu; Ruoxiu Xiao
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-01-11

8.  Detecting Cochlear Synaptopathy Through Curvature Quantification of the Auditory Brainstem Response.

Authors:  Jianxin Bao; Segun Light Jegede; John W Hawks; Bethany Dade; Qiang Guan; Samantha Middaugh; Ziyu Qiu; Anna Levina; Tsung-Heng Tsai
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 5.505

9.  Audiological biomarkers of tinnitus in an older Portuguese population.

Authors:  Haúla F Haider; Diogo Ribeiro; Sara F Ribeiro; Nuno Trigueiros; Helena Caria; Luís Borrego; Iola Pinto; Ana L Papoila; Derek J Hoare; João Paço
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 5.702

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.