Literature DB >> 31437652

A simple algorithm for objective threshold determination of auditory brainstem responses.

Kirupa Suthakar1, M Charles Liberman2.   

Abstract

The auditory brainstem response (ABR) is a sound-evoked neural response commonly used to assess auditory function in humans and laboratory animals. ABR thresholds are typically chosen by visual inspection, leaving the procedure susceptible to user bias. We sought to develop an algorithm to automate determination of ABR thresholds to eliminate such biases and to standardize approaches across investigators and laboratories. Two datasets of mouse ABR waveforms obtained from previously published studies of normal ears as well as ears with varying degrees of cochlear-based threshold elevations (Maison et al., 2013; Sergeyenko et al., 2013) were reanalyzed using an algorithm based on normalized cross-covariation of adjacent level presentations. Correlation-coefficient vs. level data for each ABR level series were fit with both a sigmoidal and two-term power function. From these fits, threshold was interpolated at different criterion values of correlation-coefficient ranging from 0 to 0.5. The criterion value of 0.35 was selected by comparing visual thresholds to computed thresholds across all frequencies tested. With such a criterion, the mean algorithm-computed thresholds were comparable to the visual thresholds noted by two independent observers for each data set. The success of the algorithm was also qualitatively assessed by comparing averaged waveforms at the thresholds determined by the two methods, and quantitatively assessed by comparing peak 1 amplitude growth functions expressed as dB re each of the two threshold measures. Application of a cross-covariance analysis to ABR waveforms can emulate visual thresholding decisions made by highly trained observers. Unlike previous applications of similar methodologies using template matching, our algorithm performs only intrinsic comparisons within ABR sets, and therefore is more robust to equipment and investigator differences in assessing waveforms, as evidenced by similar results across the two datasets.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ABR; Algorithm; Auditory; Auditory Brainstem Response; Automatic; Correlation; Hearing; SPL; Sound Pressure Level; Threshold

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31437652      PMCID: PMC6726521          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2019.107782

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  47 in total

1.  Age-related cochlear synaptopathy: an early-onset contributor to auditory functional decline.

Authors:  Yevgeniya Sergeyenko; Kumud Lall; M Charles Liberman; Sharon G Kujawa
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  The olivocochlear efferent bundle and susceptibility of the inner ear to acoustic injury.

Authors:  M C Liberman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Generators of the brainstem auditory evoked potential in cat. II. Correlating lesion sites with waveform changes.

Authors:  J R Melcher; J J Guinan; I M Knudson; N Y Kiang
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Objective auditory brainstem response classification using machine learning.

Authors:  Richard M McKearney; Robert C MacKinnon
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2019-01-21       Impact factor: 2.117

5.  Auditory brain stem responses in the cat. I. Intracranial and extracranial recordings.

Authors:  L J Achor; A Starr
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1980-02

6.  Automated electrophysiologic hearing testing using a threshold-seeking algorithm.

Authors:  O Ozdamar; R E Delgado; R E Eilers; R C Urbano
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 1.664

7.  Quality estimation of averaged auditory brainstem responses.

Authors:  C Elberling; M Don
Journal:  Scand Audiol       Date:  1984

8.  A computerized scoring procedure for auditory brainstem response audiometry.

Authors:  B A Weber; G L Fletcher
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1980 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Tone-burst auditory brainstem response wave V latencies in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired ears.

Authors:  James D Lewis; Judy Kopun; Stephen T Neely; Kendra K Schmid; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Short latency compound action potentials from mammalian gravity receptor organs.

Authors:  T A Jones; S M Jones
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  4 in total

1.  Auditory brainstem responses in the bat Carollia perspicillata: threshold calculation and relation to audiograms based on otoacoustic emission measurement.

Authors:  Johannes Wetekam; Christin Reissig; Julio C Hechavarria; Manfred Kössl
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Physiological Evidence for Delayed Age-related Hearing Loss in Two Long-lived Rodent Species (Peromyscus leucopus and P. californicus).

Authors:  Grace Capshaw; Sergio Vicencio-Jimenez; Laurel A Screven; Kali Burke; Madison M Weinberg; Amanda M Lauer
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-07-26

3.  Noise Masking in Cochlear Synaptopathy: Auditory Brainstem Response vs. Auditory Nerve Response in Mouse.

Authors:  Kirupa Suthakar; M Charles Liberman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 2.974

4.  Auditory-nerve responses in mice with noise-induced cochlear synaptopathy.

Authors:  Kirupa Suthakar; M Charles Liberman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 2.974

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.