Literature DB >> 22225043

Inverse solution of ear-canal area function from reflectance.

Daniel M Rasetshwane1, Stephen T Neely.   

Abstract

A number of acoustical applications require the transformation of acoustical quantities, such as impedance and pressure that are measured at the entrance of the ear canal, to quantities at the eardrum. This transformation often requires knowledge of the shape of the ear canal. Previous attempts to measure ear-canal area functions were either invasive, non-reproducible, or could only measure the area function up to a point mid-way along the canal. A method to determine the area function of the ear canal from measurements of acoustic impedance at the entrance of the ear canal is described. The method is based on a solution to the inverse problem in which measurements of impedance are used to calculate reflectance, which is then used to determine the area function of the canal. The mean ear-canal area function determined using this method is similar to mean ear-canal area functions measured by other researchers using different techniques. The advantage of the proposed method over previous methods is that it is non- invasive, fast, and reproducible.
© 2011 Acoustical Society of America

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22225043      PMCID: PMC3253594          DOI: 10.1121/1.3654019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  18 in total

1.  Measurements of human middle ear forward and reverse acoustics: implications for otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Sunil Puria
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Further assessment of forward pressure level for in situ calibration.

Authors:  Rachel A Scheperle; Shawn S Goodman; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Acoustical Impedance and the Theory of Horns and of the Phonograph.

Authors:  A G Webster
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1919-07       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Method to measure acoustic impedance and reflection coefficient.

Authors:  D H Keefe; R Ling; J C Bulen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Determination of the geometry of the human vocal tract by acoustic measurements.

Authors:  M R Schroeder
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1967-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Specification of the geometry of the human ear canal for the prediction of sound-pressure level distribution.

Authors:  M R Stinson; B W Lawton
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  High-frequency audiometric assessment of a young adult population.

Authors:  D M Green; G Kidd; K N Stevens
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Specification of the acoustical input to the ear at high frequencies.

Authors:  S M Khanna; M R Stinson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Estimation of the area function of human ear canals by sound pressure measurements.

Authors:  H Hudde
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Measurement of the eardrum impedance of human ears.

Authors:  H Hudde
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  26 in total

1.  Further assessment of forward pressure level for in situ calibration.

Authors:  Rachel A Scheperle; Shawn S Goodman; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Reflectance of acoustic horns and solution of the inverse problem.

Authors:  Daniel M Rasetshwane; Stephen T Neely; Jont B Allen; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Reflectance measurement validation using acoustic horns.

Authors:  Daniel M Rasetshwane; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Non-invasive estimation of middle-ear input impedance and efficiency.

Authors:  James D Lewis; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Cochlear Reflectance and Otoacoustic Emission Predictions of Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Stephen T Neely; Sara E Fultz; Judy G Kopun; Natalie M Lenzen; Daniel M Rasetshwane
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Age Effects on Cochlear Reflectance in Adults.

Authors:  Sara E Fultz; Kenneth I Vaden; Daniel M Rasetshwane; Judy G Kopun; Stephen T Neely; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Comparison of nine methods to estimate ear-canal stimulus levels.

Authors:  Natalie N Souza; Sumitrajit Dhar; Stephen T Neely; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Sound pressure distribution within human ear canals: II. Reverse mechanical stimulation.

Authors:  Michael E Ravicz; Jeffrey Tao Cheng; John J Rosowski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Measurements of ear-canal cross-sectional areas from live human ears with implications for wideband acoustic immittance measurements.

Authors:  Susan E Voss; Nicholas J Horton; Katherine E Fairbank; Lu Xia; Lauren R K Tinglin; Kathryn D Girardin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Characterizing the ear canal acoustic impedance and reflectance by pole-zero fitting.

Authors:  Sarah R Robinson; Cac T Nguyen; Jont B Allen
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.