Literature DB >> 18345838

Comparison between otoacoustic and auditory brainstem response latencies supports slow backward propagation of otoacoustic emissions.

Arturo Moleti1, Renata Sisto.   

Abstract

Experimental measurements of the latency of transient evoked otoacoustic emission and auditory brainstem responses are compared, to discriminate between different cochlear models for the backward acoustic propagation of otoacoustic emissions. In most transmission-line cochlear models otoacoustic emissions propagate towards the base as a slow transverse traveling wave, whereas other models assume fast backward propagation via longitudinal compression waves in the fluid. Recently, sensitive measurements of the basilar membrane motion have cast serious doubts on the existence of slow backward traveling waves associated with distortion product otoacoustic emissions [He et al., Hear. Res. 228, 112-122 (2007)]. On the other hand, recent analyses of "Allen-Fahey" experiments suggest instead that the slow mechanism transports most of the otoacoustic energy [Shera et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 122, 1564-1575 (2007)]. The two models can also be discriminated by comparing accurate estimates of the otoacoustic emission latency and of the auditory brainstem response latency. In this study, this comparison is done using human data, partly original, and partly from the literature. The results are inconsistent with fast otoacoustic propagation, and suggest that slow traveling waves on the basilar membrane are indeed the main mechanism for the backward propagation of the otoacoustic energy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18345838     DOI: 10.1121/1.2836781

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  8 in total

1.  Effects of low-frequency biasing on otoacoustic and neural measures suggest that stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions originate near the peak region of the traveling wave.

Authors:  Jeffery T Lichtenhan
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-10-15

2.  Obtaining reliable phase-gradient delays from otoacoustic emission data.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; Christopher Bergevin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Distortion products and backward-traveling waves in nonlinear active models of the cochlea.

Authors:  Renata Sisto; Arturo Moleti; Teresa Botti; Daniele Bertaccini; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Latency of tone-burst-evoked auditory brain stem responses and otoacoustic emissions: level, frequency, and rise-time effects.

Authors:  Daniel M Rasetshwane; Michael Argenyi; Stephen T Neely; Judy G Kopun; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Relating the Variability of Tone-Burst Otoacoustic Emission and Auditory Brainstem Response Latencies to the Underlying Cochlear Mechanics.

Authors:  Sarah Verhulst; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  AIP Conf Proc       Date:  2015-12-31

6.  Reliability and clinical test performance of cochlear reflectance.

Authors:  Daniel M Rasetshwane; Sara E Fultz; Judy G Kopun; Michael P Gorga; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Experimental evidence for a cochlear source of the precedence effect.

Authors:  Federica Bianchi; Sarah Verhulst; Torsten Dau
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-08-01

8.  In Vivo Basilar Membrane Time Delays in Humans.

Authors:  Marek Polak; Artur Lorens; Adam Walkowiak; Mariusz Furmanek; Piotr Henryk Skarzynski; Henryk Skarzynski
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-03-17
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.