Literature DB >> 19275280

Steep and shallow phase gradient distortion product otoacoustic emissions arising basal to the primary tones.

Glen K Martin1, Barden B Stagner, Paul F Fahey, Brenda L Lonsbury-Martin.   

Abstract

Distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) level/phase maps were collected in humans with and without an interference tone (IT) near the DPOAE frequency place (f(dp)) at primary-tone levels of 75 dB SPL. A DPOAE component with the expected steep phase gradient could be extracted at f(dp), however, considerable vertical-phase banding, presumably indicative of reflection emissions, remained. An IT placed 0.33 oct above f(2) removed most of this banding, revealing DPOAE components originating basal to the IT frequency place. These findings suggest that the commonly accepted two-source model of DPOAE generation may need to be qualified when higher primary-tone levels are utilized.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19275280      PMCID: PMC2677286          DOI: 10.1121/1.3073734

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  12 in total

1.  Indications of different distortion product otoacoustic emission mechanisms from a detailed f1,f2 area study.

Authors:  R D Knight; D T Kemp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Distortion-product source unmixing: a test of the two-mechanism model for DPOAE generation.

Authors:  R Kalluri; C A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Sources of distortion product otoacoustic emissions revealed by suppression experiments and inverse fast Fourier transforms in normal ears.

Authors:  D Konrad-Martin; S T Neely; D H Keefe; P A Dorn; M P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Multiple internal reflections in the cochlea and their effect on DPOAE fine structure.

Authors:  Sumitrajit Dhar; Carrick L Talmadge; Glenis R Long; Arnold Tubis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  The effect of stimulus-frequency ratio on distortion product otoacoustic emission components.

Authors:  Sumitrajit Dhar; Glenis R Long; Carrick L Talmadge; Arnold Tubis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Wave and place fixed DPOAE maps of the human ear.

Authors:  R D Knight; D T Kemp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  The origin of periodicity in the spectrum of evoked otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  G Zweig; C A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Modeling otoacoustic emission and hearing threshold fine structures.

Authors:  C L Talmadge; A Tubis; G R Long; P Piskorski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Experimental confirmation of the two-source interference model for the fine structure of distortion product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  C L Talmadge; G R Long; A Tubis; S Dhar
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Locus of generation for the 2f1-f2 vs 2f2-f1 distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing humans revealed by suppression tuning, onset latencies, and amplitude correlations.

Authors:  G K Martin; D Jassir; B B Stagner; M L Whitehead; B L Lonsbury-Martin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  15 in total

1.  Local cochlear damage reduces local nonlinearity and decreases generator-type cochlear emissions while increasing reflector-type emissions.

Authors:  Wei Dong; Elizabeth S Olson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Time-domain demonstration of distributed distortion-product otoacoustic emission components.

Authors:  Glen K Martin; Barden B Stagner; Brenda L Lonsbury-Martin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Comparing behavioral and physiological measures of combination tones: sex and race differences.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Edward G Pasanen; Erin M Leshikar; Michelle D Hsieh; Mindy M Maloney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Level dependence of distortion product otoacoustic emission phase is attributed to component mixing.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Sumitrajit Dhar; Radha Kalluri
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Characterizing distortion-product otoacoustic emission components across four species.

Authors:  Glen K Martin; Barden B Stagner; You Sun Chung; Brenda L Lonsbury-Martin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Tuning of SFOAEs Evoked by Low-Frequency Tones Is Not Compatible with Localized Emission Generation.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-03-27

7.  Distortion-product otoacoustic emission test performance for ototoxicity monitoring.

Authors:  Kelly M Reavis; Garnett McMillan; Donald Austin; Frederick Gallun; Stephen A Fausti; Jane S Gordon; Wendy J Helt; Dawn Konrad-Martin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Maturation and aging of the human cochlea: a view through the DPOAE looking glass.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-04-03

9.  Multivariate DPOAE metrics for identifying changes in hearing: perspectives from ototoxicity monitoring.

Authors:  Dawn Konrad-Martin; Kelly M Reavis; Garnett P McMillan; Marilyn F Dille
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.117

10.  Distortion product otoacoustic emissions: Sensitive measures of tympanic -membrane perforation and healing processes in a gerbil model.

Authors:  Wei Dong; Glenna Stomackin; Xiaohui Lin; Glen K Martin; Timothy T Jung
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.