Literature DB >> 11248969

Distortion-product source unmixing: a test of the two-mechanism model for DPOAE generation.

R Kalluri1, C A Shera.   

Abstract

This paper tests key predictions of the "two-mechanism model" for the generation of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs). The two-mechanism model asserts that lower-sideband DPOAEs constitute a mixture of emissions arising not simply from two distinct cochlear locations (as is now well established) but, more importantly, by two fundamentally different mechanisms: nonlinear distortion induced by the traveling wave and linear coherent reflection off pre-existing micromechanical impedance perturbations. The model predicts that (1) DPOAEs evoked by frequency-scaled stimuli (e.g., at fixed f2/f1) can be unmixed into putative distortion- and reflection-source components with the frequency dependence of their phases consistent with the presumed mechanisms of generation; (2) The putative reflection-source component of the total DPOAE closely matches the reflection-source emission (e.g., low level stimulus-frequency emission) measured at the same frequency under similar conditions. These predictions were tested by unmixing DPOAEs into components using two completely different methods: (a) selective suppression of the putative reflection source using a third tone near the distortion-product frequency and (b) spectral smoothing (or, equivalently, time-domain windowing). Although the two methods unmix in very different ways, they yield similar DPOAE components. The properties of the two DPOAE components are consistent with the predictions of the two-mechanism model.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11248969     DOI: 10.1121/1.1334597

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  64 in total

1.  Sound-evoked olivocochlear activation in unanesthetized mice.

Authors:  Anna R Chambers; Kenneth E Hancock; Stéphane F Maison; M Charles Liberman; Daniel B Polley
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-12-13

2.  Otoacoustic emissions without somatic motility: can stereocilia mechanics drive the mammalian cochlea?

Authors:  M C Liberman; Jian Zuo; J J Guinan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 3.  [Sound and velocity DPOAEs : Technology, methodology and perspectives].

Authors:  E Dalhoff; A Vetesník; D Turcanu; A W Gummer
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  Optimizing swept-tone protocols for recording distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in adults and newborns.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Ping Luo; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Reducing reflected contributions to ear-canal distortion product otoacoustic emissions in humans.

Authors:  Tiffany A Johnson; Stephen T Neely; Judy G Kopun; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Distortion product otoacoustic emissions measured as vibration on the eardrum of human subjects.

Authors:  E Dalhoff; D Turcanu; H-P Zenner; A W Gummer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-01-22       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Use of stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission latency and level to investigate cochlear mechanics in human ears.

Authors:  Kim S Schairer; John C Ellison; Denis Fitzpatrick; Douglas H Keefe
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Inverted direction of wave propagation (IDWP) in the cochlea.

Authors:  Egbert de Boer; Jiefu Zheng; Edward Porsov; Alfred L Nuttall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Distortion product otoacoustic emissions: cochlear-source contributions and clinical test performance.

Authors:  Tiffany A Johnson; Stephen T Neely; Judy G Kopun; Darcia M Dierking; Hongyang Tan; Connie Converse; Elizabeth Kennedy; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Sex differences in distortion-product and transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions compared.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Glen K Martin; Barden B Stagner; Mindy M Maloney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.