Literature DB >> 10641654

Indications of different distortion product otoacoustic emission mechanisms from a detailed f1,f2 area study.

R D Knight1, D T Kemp.   

Abstract

The primary site of generation on the basilar membrane for the 2f1-f2 distortion product (DP) is generally considered to be near where the higher-frequency stimulus tone peaks. This site has also been shown to be a source of DP otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) in the ear canal, but a second source of emission is known to exist in the region of the DP frequency place. The DPOAE phase versus frequency gradient provides a means of investigating the emission mechanisms. "Wave-fixed" and "place-fixed" mechanisms have been proposed to account for the very different phase gradients found depending on whether the 2f1-f2 DPOAE is evoked by a small or large stimulus-frequency ratio. DPOAE phase versus frequency gradients can be investigated either by sweeping f1,f2 or by sweeping both frequencies maintaining a constant frequency ratio. Each manipulation gives only a partial description of DP behavior. In this study, the place-fixed/ wave-fixed dichotomy is analyzed using extensive 2f1-f2 and 2f2-f1 DP stimulus-frequency sweep data presented on matrices of f1 vs f2 and f2/f1 ratio versus DP frequency. These show how the DPs are related and provide a more complete picture of 2 f1-f2 and 2f2-f1 DPOAE phase and amplitude versus frequency behavior. The phase data contain evidence for a systematic variation in the proportions of wave- and place-fixed emission. The results suggest that 2f1-f2 DPOAEs with a wide stimulus frequency ratio are wave fixed, while all other DPOAEs are place fixed. A transition occurs within the 2 f1-f2 DP data region at a frequency ratio of about f2/f1 = 1.1. The 2f1-f2 DP and 2 f2-f1 DP phase behavior is continuous across the f2/f1 = 1 boundary. As the 2 f2-f1 DP generation region must be strongly influenced by the DP frequency place, the results imply that the place-fixed component of the 2 f1-f2 DP is also linked to its frequency place. A similar pattern was obtained with the 3f1-2f2 and 3f2-2f1 DPs. The results support the following model: For the limited set of stimulus conditions that gives rise to 2 f1-f2 wave-fixed emissions, DP energy is largely generated in the f2 region and is emitted directly. All other DPOAEs are place-fixed emissions, and while nonlinearity within the f2 stimulus envelope remains the generator, the DP is not directly emitted but travels apically until it is re-emitted basally via a separate reflection mechanism in the region of the DP place.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10641654     DOI: 10.1121/1.428351

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  36 in total

1.  Probing cochlear tuning and tonotopy in the tiger using otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Christopher Bergevin; Edward J Walsh; JoAnn McGee; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Optimizing swept-tone protocols for recording distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in adults and newborns.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Ping Luo; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Detailed f1, f2 area study of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in the frog.

Authors:  Sebastiaan W F Meenderink; Peter M Narins; Pim van Dijk
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2005-04-22

4.  Use of stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission latency and level to investigate cochlear mechanics in human ears.

Authors:  Kim S Schairer; John C Ellison; Denis Fitzpatrick; Douglas H Keefe
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Source of level dependent minima in rabbit distortion product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  P F Fahey; B B Stagner; G K Martin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Testing coherent reflection in chinchilla: Auditory-nerve responses predict stimulus-frequency emissions.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; Arnold Tubis; Carrick L Talmadge
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Steep and shallow phase gradient distortion product otoacoustic emissions arising basal to the primary tones.

Authors:  Glen K Martin; Barden B Stagner; Paul F Fahey; Brenda L Lonsbury-Martin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Local cochlear damage reduces local nonlinearity and decreases generator-type cochlear emissions while increasing reflector-type emissions.

Authors:  Wei Dong; Elizabeth S Olson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Breaking away: violation of distortion emission phase-frequency invariance at low frequencies.

Authors:  Sumitrajit Dhar; Abigail Rogers; Carolina Abdala
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Towards a joint reflection-distortion otoacoustic emission profile: Results in normal and impaired ears.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Radha Kalluri
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.