Literature DB >> 30709692

Distortion product otoacoustic emissions: Sensitive measures of tympanic -membrane perforation and healing processes in a gerbil model.

Wei Dong1, Glenna Stomackin2, Xiaohui Lin2, Glen K Martin3, Timothy T Jung3.   

Abstract

Distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) evoked by two pure tones carry information about the mechanisms that generate and shape them. Thus, DPOAEs hold promise for providing powerful noninvasive diagnostic details of cochlear operations, middle ear (ME) transmission, and impairments. DPOAEs are sensitive to ME function because they are influenced by ME transmission twice, i.e., by the inward-going primary tones in the forward direction and the outward traveling DPOAEs in the reverse direction. However, the effects of ME injuries on DPOAEs have not been systematically characterized. The current study focused on exploring the utility of DPOAEs for examining ME function by methodically characterizing DPOAEs and ME transmission under pathological ME conditions, specifically under conditions of tympanic-membrane (TM) perforation and spontaneous healing. Results indicated that DPOAEs were measurable with TM perforations up to ∼50%, and DPOAE reductions increased with increasing size of the TM perforation. DPOAE reductions were approximately flat across test frequencies when the TM was perforated about 10% (<1/8 of pars tensa) or less. However, with perforations greater than 10%, DPOAEs decreased further with a low-pass filter shape, with ∼30 dB loss at frequencies below 10 kHz and a quick downward sloping pattern at higher frequencies. The reduction pattern of DPOAEs across frequencies was similar to but much greater than, the directly measured ME pressure gain in the forward direction, which suggested that reduction in the DPOAE was a summation of losses of ME ear transmission in both the forward and reverse directions. Following 50% TM perforations, DPOAEs recovered over a 4-week spontaneously healing interval, and these recoveries were confirmed by improvements in auditory brainstem response (ABR) thresholds. However, up to 4-week post-perforation, DPOAEs never fully recovered to the levels obtained with normal intact TM, consistent with the incomplete recovery of ABR thresholds and ME transmission, especially at high-frequency regions, which could be explained by an irregularly dense and thickened healed TM. Since TM perforations in patients are commonly caused by either trauma or infection, the present results contribute towards providing insight into understanding ME transmission under pathological conditions as well as promoting the application of DPOAEs in the evaluation and diagnosis of deficits in the ME-transmission system. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Distortion product otoacoustic emissions; Hearing; Middle ear function; Middle ear pressure gain; Spontaneously-healed tympanic membrane; Tympanic membrane perforation

Year:  2019        PMID: 30709692      PMCID: PMC6556135          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2019.01.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  60 in total

1.  Middle-ear function with tympanic-membrane perforations. I. Measurements and mechanisms.

Authors:  S E Voss; J J Rosowski; S N Merchant; W T Peake
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Reverse transmission along the ossicular chain in gerbil.

Authors:  Wei Dong; Willem F Decraemer; Elizabeth S Olson
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-03-31

3.  Simultaneous measurement of middle-ear input impedance and forward/reverse transmission in cat.

Authors:  Susan E Voss; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Realistic 3D computer model of the gerbil middle ear, featuring accurate morphology of bone and soft tissue structures.

Authors:  Jan A N Buytaert; Wasil H M Salih; Manual Dierick; Patric Jacobs; Joris J J Dirckx
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-07-13

5.  Simultaneous Intracochlear Pressure Measurements from Two Cochlear Locations: Propagation of Distortion Products in Gerbil.

Authors:  Wei Dong
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-12-01

6.  Middle-Ear Sound Transmission Under Normal, Damaged, Repaired, and Reconstructed Conditions.

Authors:  Wei Dong; Ying Tian; Xin Gao; Timothy T K Jung
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  Perforations of the tympanic membrane and their effects upon middle-ear transmission.

Authors:  F E McArdle; J Tonndorf
Journal:  Arch Klin Exp Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd       Date:  1968

8.  Age-related changes in auditory evoked potentials of gerbils. I. Response amplitudes.

Authors:  F A Boettcher; J H Mills; B L Norton
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system.

Authors:  D T Kemp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Forward and reverse transfer functions of the middle ear based on pressure and velocity DPOAEs with implications for differential hearing diagnosis.

Authors:  Ernst Dalhoff; Diana Turcanu; Anthony W Gummer
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  4 in total

1.  Recovery from tympanic membrane perforation: Effects on membrane thickness, auditory thresholds, and middle ear transmission.

Authors:  Lingling Cai; Glenna Stomackin; Nicholas M Perez; Xiaohui Lin; Timothy T Jung; Wei Dong
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Forward and Reverse Middle Ear Transmission in Gerbil with a Normal or Spontaneously Healed Tympanic Membrane.

Authors:  Xiaohui Lin; Sebastiaan W F Meenderink; Glenna Stomackin; Timothy T Jung; Glen K Martin; Wei Dong
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-02-16

Review 3.  Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction and the Encapsulation of Bioactive Components for Food Applications.

Authors:  Nitin Mehta; Jeyapriya S; Pavan Kumar; Akhilesh Kumar Verma; Pramila Umaraw; Sunil Kumar Khatkar; Anju Boora Khatkar; Devendra Pathak; Ubedullah Kaka; Awis Qurni Sazili
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-09-23

4.  Assessment of auditory and vestibular damage in a mouse model after single and triple blast exposures.

Authors:  Beatrice Mao; Ying Wang; Tara Balasubramanian; Rodrigo Urioste; Talah Wafa; Tracy S Fitzgerald; Scott J Haraczy; Kamren Edwards-Hollingsworth; Zahra N Sayyid; Donna Wilder; Venkata Siva Sai Sujith Sajja; Yanling Wei; Peethambaran Arun; Irene Gist; Alan G Cheng; Joseph B Long; Matthew W Kelley
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 3.672

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.