Literature DB >> 20329842

Local cochlear damage reduces local nonlinearity and decreases generator-type cochlear emissions while increasing reflector-type emissions.

Wei Dong1, Elizabeth S Olson.   

Abstract

Distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) originate in cochlear nonlinearity and emerge into the ear canal as an apparent sum of emission types, one of which (generator) travels directly out and the other (reflector) travels out following linear reflection. The present study explores intracochlear sources of DPOAEs via simultaneous ear canal and intracochlear pressure measurements in gerbils. A locally damaged cochlea was produced with reduced local intracochlear nonlinearity and significant elevation of the compound action potential thresholds at frequencies represented within the damaged region. In the DPOAE the comparison of healthy to locally damaged cochleae showed the following: (1) In the broad frequency region corresponding to the locally damaged best frequency, DPOAEs evoked by wider f(2)/f(1) stimuli decreased, consistent with the reduction in local nonlinearity. (2) DPOAEs evoked by narrow f(2)/f(1) stimuli often had a bimodal change, decreasing in a lower frequency band and increasing in a band just adjacent and higher, and the DPOAE phase-vs-frequency slope steepened. These changes confirm the complex nature of the DPOAE.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20329842      PMCID: PMC2856509          DOI: 10.1121/1.3291682

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  51 in total

1.  Direct measurement of intra-cochlear pressure waves.

Authors:  E S Olson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-12-02       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Evidence for the distortion product frequency place as a source of distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) fine structure in humans. I. Fine structure and higher-order DPOAE as a function of the frequency ratio f2/f1.

Authors:  M Mauermann; S Uppenkamp; P W van Hengel; B Kollmeier
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Interpretation of standard distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements in light of the complete parametric response.

Authors:  David M Mills
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Physiopathological significance of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions at 2f1-f2 produced by high- versus low-level stimuli.

Authors:  Paul Avan; Pierre Bonfils; Laurent Gilain; Thierry Mom
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Reverse propagation of sound in the gerbil cochlea.

Authors:  Tianying Ren
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-03-21       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  Harmonic distortion in intracochlear pressure and its analysis to explore the cochlear amplifier.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Olson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Steep and shallow phase gradient distortion product otoacoustic emissions arising basal to the primary tones.

Authors:  Glen K Martin; Barden B Stagner; Paul F Fahey; Brenda L Lonsbury-Martin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Generation of DPOAEs in the guinea pig.

Authors:  Robert H Withnell; Lauren A Shaffer; Carrick L Talmadge
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Differential responses to acoustic damage and furosemide in auditory brainstem and otoacoustic emission measures.

Authors:  David M Mills
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Temporary DPOAE level shifts, ABR threshold shifts and histopathological damage following below-critical-level noise exposures.

Authors:  Gary W Harding; Barbara A Bohne
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  11 in total

1.  Direction of wave propagation in the cochlea for internally excited basilar membrane.

Authors:  Yizeng Li; Karl Grosh
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Basilar membrane velocity in a cochlea with a modified organ of Corti.

Authors:  N Eze; E S Olson
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Comparison of distortion-product otoacoustic emission growth rates and slopes of forward-masked psychometric functions.

Authors:  Joyce Rodríguez; Stephen T Neely; Walt Jesteadt; Hongyang Tan; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Adaptation of Cochlear Amplification to Low Endocochlear Potential.

Authors:  Yi Wang; Elika Fallah; Elizabeth S Olson
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2019-03-30       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Simultaneous Intracochlear Pressure Measurements from Two Cochlear Locations: Propagation of Distortion Products in Gerbil.

Authors:  Wei Dong
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-12-01

6.  Maturation and aging of the human cochlea: a view through the DPOAE looking glass.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-04-03

7.  Link between stimulus otoacoustic emissions fine structure peaks and standing wave resonances in a cochlear model.

Authors:  Haiqi Wen; Julien Meaud
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Distortion product otoacoustic emissions: Sensitive measures of tympanic -membrane perforation and healing processes in a gerbil model.

Authors:  Wei Dong; Glenna Stomackin; Xiaohui Lin; Glen K Martin; Timothy T Jung
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Reflection- and Distortion-Source Otoacoustic Emissions: Evidence for Increased Irregularity in the Human Cochlea During Aging.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Amanda J Ortmann; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-07-02

10.  Intracochlear distortion products are broadly generated by outer hair cells but their contributions to otoacoustic emissions are spatially restricted.

Authors:  Thomas Bowling; Haiqi Wen; Sebastiaan W F Meenderink; Wei Dong; Julien Meaud
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.