Literature DB >> 21568415

Level dependence of distortion product otoacoustic emission phase is attributed to component mixing.

Carolina Abdala1, Sumitrajit Dhar, Radha Kalluri.   

Abstract

Distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) measured in the ear canal represent the vector sum of components produced at two regions of the basilar membrane by distinct cochlear mechanisms. In this study, the effect of stimulus level on the 2f(1) - f(2) DPOAE phase was evaluated in 22 adult subjects across a three-octave range. Level effects were examined for the mixed DPOAE signal measured in the ear canal and after unmixing components to assess level effects individually on the distortion (generated at the f(1), f(2) overlap) and reflection (at f(dp)) sources. Results show that ear canal DPOAE phase slope becomes steeper with decreasing level; however, component analysis further explicates this result, indicating that interference between DPOAE components (rather than a shift in mechanics related to distortion generation) drives the level dependence of DPOAE phase measured in the ear canal. The relative contribution from the reflection source increased with decreasing level, producing more component interference and, at times, a reflection-dominated response at the lowest stimulus levels. These results have implications for the use of DPOAE phase to study cochlear mechanics and for the potential application of DPOAE phase for clinical purposes.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21568415      PMCID: PMC3108393          DOI: 10.1121/1.3573992

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  28 in total

1.  Interrelations among distortion-product phase-gradient delays: their connection to scaling symmetry and its breaking.

Authors:  C A Shera; C L Talmadge; A Tubis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Sources of distortion product otoacoustic emissions revealed by suppression experiments and inverse fast Fourier transforms in normal ears.

Authors:  D Konrad-Martin; S T Neely; D H Keefe; P A Dorn; M P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Multiple internal reflections in the cochlea and their effect on DPOAE fine structure.

Authors:  Sumitrajit Dhar; Carrick L Talmadge; Glenis R Long; Arnold Tubis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) input/output functions and the influence of the second DPOAE source.

Authors:  Manfred Mauermann; Birger Kollmeier
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Delays of stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions and cochlear vibrations contradict the theory of coherent reflection filtering.

Authors:  Jonathan H Siegel; Amanda J Cerka; Alberto Recio-Spinoso; Andrei N Temchin; Pim van Dijk; Mario A Ruggero
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Transient-evoked stimulus-frequency and distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal and impaired ears.

Authors:  Dawn Konrad-Martin; Douglas H Keefe
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Use of stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission latency and level to investigate cochlear mechanics in human ears.

Authors:  Kim S Schairer; John C Ellison; Denis Fitzpatrick; Douglas H Keefe
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Effects of middle-ear immaturity on distortion product otoacoustic emission suppression tuning in infant ears.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Douglas H Keefe
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Experimental confirmation of the two-source interference model for the fine structure of distortion product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  C L Talmadge; G R Long; A Tubis; S Dhar
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Revised estimates of human cochlear tuning from otoacoustic and behavioral measurements.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; John J Guinan; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-02-26       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  12 in total

1.  Optimizing swept-tone protocols for recording distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in adults and newborns.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Ping Luo; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Stability of the medial olivocochlear reflex as measured by distortion product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Srikanta K Mishra; Carolina Abdala
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Maturation and aging of the human cochlea: a view through the DPOAE looking glass.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-04-03

4.  Multivariate DPOAE metrics for identifying changes in hearing: perspectives from ototoxicity monitoring.

Authors:  Dawn Konrad-Martin; Kelly M Reavis; Garnett P McMillan; Marilyn F Dille
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.117

5.  Swept-tone stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions: Normative data and methodological considerations.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Yeini C Guardia; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Morphological Immaturity of the Neonatal Organ of Corti and Associated Structures in Humans.

Authors:  Sebastiaan W F Meenderink; Christopher A Shera; Michelle D Valero; M Charles Liberman; Carolina Abdala
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-08-12

7.  The relationship between MOC reflex and masked threshold.

Authors:  Angela Garinis; Lynne Werner; Carolina Abdala
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  A cochlea with three parts? Evidence from otoacoustic emission phase in humans.

Authors:  Anders T Christensen; Carolina Abdala; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Age-related shifts in distortion product otoacoustic emissions peak-ratios and amplitude modulation spectra.

Authors:  Jesyin Lai; Edward L Bartlett
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Probing Apical-Basal Differences in the Human Cochlea Using Distortion-Product Otoacoustic Emission Phase.

Authors:  Anders T Christensen; Carolina Abdala; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  AIP Conf Proc       Date:  2018-05-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.