Literature DB >> 22894218

Comparing behavioral and physiological measures of combination tones: sex and race differences.

Dennis McFadden1, Edward G Pasanen, Erin M Leshikar, Michelle D Hsieh, Mindy M Maloney.   

Abstract

Both distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) and performance in an auditory-masking task involving combination tones were measured in the same frequency region in the same ears. In the behavioral task, a signal of 3.6 kHz (duration 300 ms, rise/fall time 20 ms) was masked by a 3.0-kHz tone (62 dB SPL, continuously presented). These two frequencies can produce a combination tone at 2.4 kHz. When a narrowband noise (2.0-2.8 kHz, 17 dB spectrum level) was added as a second masker, detection of the 3.6-kHz signal worsened by 6-9 dB (the Greenwood effect), revealing that listeners had been using the combination tone at 2.4 kHz as a cue for detection at 3.6 kHz. Several outcomes differed markedly by sex and racial background. The Greenwood effect was substantially larger in females than in males, but only for the White group. When the magnitude of the Greenwood effect was compared with the magnitude of the DPOAE measured in the 2.4 kHz region, the correlations typically were modest, but were high for Non-White males. For many subjects, then, most of the DPOAE measured in the ear canal apparently is not related to the combination-tone cue that is masked by the narrowband noise.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22894218      PMCID: PMC3427363          DOI: 10.1121/1.4731224

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  51 in total

1.  Association of skin color, race/ethnicity, and hearing loss among adults in the USA.

Authors:  Frank R Lin; Paige Maas; Wade Chien; John P Carey; Luigi Ferrucci; Roland Thorpe
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-11-29

2.  Overshoot using very short signal delays.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Kyle P Walsh; Edward G Pasanen; Erin M Grenwelge
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Differences by sex, ear, and sexual orientation in the time intervals between successive peaks in auditory evoked potentials.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Michelle D Hsieh; Adrian Garcia-Sierra; Craig A Champlin
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Use of stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions to investigate efferent and cochlear contributions to temporal overshoot.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe; Kim S Schairer; John C Ellison; Denis F Fitzpatrick; Walt Jesteadt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Steep and shallow phase gradient distortion product otoacoustic emissions arising basal to the primary tones.

Authors:  Glen K Martin; Barden B Stagner; Paul F Fahey; Brenda L Lonsbury-Martin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The role of suppression in psychophysical tone-on-tone masking.

Authors:  Joyce Rodríguez; Stephen T Neely; Harisadhan Patra; Judy Kopun; Walt Jesteadt; Hongyang Tan; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  A power primer.

Authors:  J Cohen
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 8.  Sexual orientation and the auditory system.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden
Journal:  Front Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2011-02-12       Impact factor: 8.606

9.  Overshoot measured physiologically and psychophysically in the same human ears.

Authors:  Kyle P Walsh; Edward G Pasanen; Dennis McFadden
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Relationships between otoacoustic emissions and a proxy measure of cochlear length derived from the auditory brainstem response.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Adrian Garcia-Sierra; Michelle D Hsieh; Mindy M Maloney; Craig A Champlin; Edward G Pasanen
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-04-21       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  7 in total

1.  Correlations between otoacoustic emissions and performance in common psychoacoustical tasks.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Edward G Pasanen; Mindy M Maloney; Erin M Leshikar; Michelle H Pho
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Differences in common psychoacoustical tasks by sex, menstrual cycle, and race.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Edward G Pasanen; Mindy M Maloney; Erin M Leshikar; Michelle H Pho
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Examining replicability of an otoacoustic measure of cochlear function during selective attention.

Authors:  Jordan A Beim; Andrew J Oxenham; Magdalena Wojtczak
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Relationships between otoacoustic emissions and a proxy measure of cochlear length derived from the auditory brainstem response.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Adrian Garcia-Sierra; Michelle D Hsieh; Mindy M Maloney; Craig A Champlin; Edward G Pasanen
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-04-21       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Auditory evoked potentials: Differences by sex, race, and menstrual cycle and correlations with common psychoacoustical tasks.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Craig A Champlin; Michelle H Pho; Edward G Pasanen; Mindy M Maloney; Erin M Leshikar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Sex Genotyping of Archival Fixed and Immunolabeled Guinea Pig Cochleas.

Authors:  Frédéric F Depreux; Lyubov Czech; Donna S Whitlon
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Predicting the Risk of Hearing Impairment Following the Cervical Spine Diseases by Measuring the Cervical Range of Movements: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Behnoosh Vasaghi-Gharamaleki; Zahra Naser
Journal:  Basic Clin Neurosci       Date:  2017 Sep-Oct
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.