Literature DB >> 9566319

Locus of generation for the 2f1-f2 vs 2f2-f1 distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing humans revealed by suppression tuning, onset latencies, and amplitude correlations.

G K Martin1, D Jassir, B B Stagner, M L Whitehead, B L Lonsbury-Martin.   

Abstract

The present study used distortion-product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) suppression tuning curves (STCs), DPOAE onset latencies (OLs), and DPOAE amplitude correlations to investigate the locus of generation of the 2f1-f2 DPOAE versus the 2f2-f1 DPOAE in humans. The results of the tuning study revealed that, for the 2f1-f2 DPOAE, the tips of the STCs tuned consistently below the geometric-mean (GM) frequency of the primary tones. In contrast, for the 2f2-f1 DPOAE, STCs tuned above the GM of the primaries, with 50% of the tip frequencies at, or above, the 2f2-f1 frequency place. When the average ratio of the 2f2-f1 to the 2f1-f2 tip frequencies was computed, a factor of 1.44 provided an estimate of the frequency shift needed to align the two DPOAE generation sites. Other results showed that OLs for the 2f2-f1 DPOAE were uniformly shorter than those for the 2f1-f2, with differences at the low frequencies amounting to as much as 6-7 ms. Further, for both DPOAEs, curves describing latency decreases as a function of increasing GM frequencies were best fit by power functions. Shifting the GM frequency producing the 2f2-f1 DPOAE by a factor of 1.6 caused the latency distributions for both DPOAEs to overlap thus resulting in a single function that described cochlear delay as a function of GM frequency. Finally, for each GM frequency in the DP-gram, sliding correlations from 108 normal ears were performed on both DPOAEs by holding the primaries producing the 2f1-f2 DPOAE constant, while all 2f2-f1 DPOAE amplitudes were successively correlated with the 2f1-f2 amplitudes. This procedure demonstrated that, for a given GM frequency producing the 2f1-f2, the correlations between the two DPOAEs peaked when the primaries of the 2f2-f1 were at a GM frequency that positioned the 2f2-f1 frequency place near the GM of the primaries that produced the 2f1-f2 DPOAE. As a whole, the above findings strongly suggest that the 2f2-f1 DPOAE in humans is generated basal to the primary-tone place on the basilar membrane.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9566319     DOI: 10.1121/1.421347

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  16 in total

1.  A multifrequency method for determining cochlear efferent activity.

Authors:  Anne E Luebke; Paul K Foster; Barden B Stagner
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2002-03

2.  An alternate approach to constructing distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) suppression tuning curves.

Authors:  Tiffany A Johnson; Stephen T Neely; Darcia M Dierking; Brenda M Hoover; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Steep and shallow phase gradient distortion product otoacoustic emissions arising basal to the primary tones.

Authors:  Glen K Martin; Barden B Stagner; Paul F Fahey; Brenda L Lonsbury-Martin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  The role of suppression in psychophysical tone-on-tone masking.

Authors:  Joyce Rodríguez; Stephen T Neely; Harisadhan Patra; Judy Kopun; Walt Jesteadt; Hongyang Tan; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Distortion-product otoacoustic emission suppression tuning curves in humans.

Authors:  Michael P Gorga; Stephen T Neely; Judy Kopun; Hongyang Tan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Growth of suppression in humans based on distortion-product otoacoustic emission measurements.

Authors:  Michael P Gorga; Stephen T Neely; Judy Kopun; Hongyang Tan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Characterizing distortion-product otoacoustic emission components across four species.

Authors:  Glen K Martin; Barden B Stagner; You Sun Chung; Brenda L Lonsbury-Martin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Adaptation of distortion product otoacoustic emissions predicts susceptibility to acoustic over-exposure in alert rabbits.

Authors:  Anne E Luebke; Barden B Stagner; Glen K Martin; Brenda L Lonsbury-Martin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Correlations between otoacoustic emissions and performance in common psychoacoustical tasks.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Edward G Pasanen; Mindy M Maloney; Erin M Leshikar; Michelle H Pho
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Comparison of otoacoustic emissions within gecko subfamilies: morphological implications for auditory function in lizards.

Authors:  Christopher Bergevin
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-12-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.