Literature DB >> 9921655

Experimental confirmation of the two-source interference model for the fine structure of distortion product otoacoustic emissions.

C L Talmadge1, G R Long, A Tubis, S Dhar.   

Abstract

High-resolution measurements of distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) from three different experimental paradigms are shown to be in agreement with the implications of a realistic "two-source" cochlear model of DPOAE fine structure. The measurements of DPOAE amplitude and phase imply an interference phenomenon involving one source in the region of strong nonlinear interaction of the primary waves (the strong "overlap" or generation region), and the other source region around the DPOAE tonotopic place. The component from the DPOAE place can be larger than the one from the generator region. These findings are supported by the analysis of the onset and offset of the DPOAE when the higher-frequency primary is pulsed on and off. The two-source hypothesis was further tested by adding a third tone closer in frequency to the DPOAE which modifies the amplitude of the component from the DPOAE place and leaves the one from the generator region unchanged. The results agree well with the model prediction that the variation with frequency, and implied latency, of the phase of the DPOAE tonotopic-place component are greater than the corresponding quantities for the component from the generation region.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9921655     DOI: 10.1121/1.424584

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  61 in total

1.  [Universal neonatal screening as an application of automated audiological techniques].

Authors:  W Delb
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Direction of wave propagation in the cochlea for internally excited basilar membrane.

Authors:  Yizeng Li; Karl Grosh
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Differences in distortion product otoacoustic emission phase recorded from human neonates using two popular probes.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Optimizing swept-tone protocols for recording distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in adults and newborns.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Ping Luo; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Detailed f1, f2 area study of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in the frog.

Authors:  Sebastiaan W F Meenderink; Peter M Narins; Pim van Dijk
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2005-04-22

6.  Two-tone distortion in intracochlear pressure.

Authors:  Wei Dong; Elizabeth S Olson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Reducing reflected contributions to ear-canal distortion product otoacoustic emissions in humans.

Authors:  Tiffany A Johnson; Stephen T Neely; Judy G Kopun; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Distortion product otoacoustic emissions: cochlear-source contributions and clinical test performance.

Authors:  Tiffany A Johnson; Stephen T Neely; Judy G Kopun; Darcia M Dierking; Hongyang Tan; Connie Converse; Elizabeth Kennedy; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Estimating the operating point of the cochlear transducer using low-frequency biased distortion products.

Authors:  Daniel J Brown; Jared J Hartsock; Ruth M Gill; Hillary E Fitzgerald; Alec N Salt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Towards a joint reflection-distortion otoacoustic emission profile: Results in normal and impaired ears.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Radha Kalluri
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.