Literature DB >> 9745736

Modeling otoacoustic emission and hearing threshold fine structures.

C L Talmadge1, A Tubis, G R Long, P Piskorski.   

Abstract

A class of cochlear models which account for much of the characteristic variation with frequency of human otoacoustic emissions and hearing threshold microstructure is presented. The models are based upon wave reflections via distributed spatial cochlear inhomogeneities and tall and broad cochlear activity patterns, as suggested by Zweig and Shera [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 98, 2018-2047 (1995)]. They successfully describe in particular the following features: (1) the characteristic quasiperiodic frequency variations (fine structures) of the hearing threshold, synchronous and click-evoked emissions, distortion-product emissions, and spontaneous emissions; (2) the relationships between these fine structures; and (3) the distortion product emission filter shape. All of the characteristic frequency spacings are approximately the same (0.4 bark) and are mainly determined by the phase behavior of the apical reflection function. The frequency spacings for spontaneous emissions and threshold microstructure are predicted to be the same, but some deviations from these values are predicted for synchronous and click-evoked and distortion-product emissions. The analysis of models is aided considerably by the use of the solutions of apical, and basal, moving solutions (basis functions) of the cochlear wave equation in the absence of inhomogeneities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9745736     DOI: 10.1121/1.424364

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  57 in total

1.  Otoacoustic emissions from residual oscillations of the cochlear basilar membrane in a human ear model.

Authors:  Renato Nobili; Ales Vetesnik; Lorenzo Turicchia; Fabio Mammano
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-07-10

Review 2.  Do forward- and backward-traveling waves occur within the cochlea? Countering the critique of Nobili et al.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; Arnold Tubis; Carrick L Talmadge
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2004-12

3.  Reducing reflected contributions to ear-canal distortion product otoacoustic emissions in humans.

Authors:  Tiffany A Johnson; Stephen T Neely; Judy G Kopun; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Spontaneous basilar-membrane oscillation (SBMO) and coherent reflection.

Authors:  Egbert de Boer; Alfred L Nuttall
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2006-01-21

5.  Use of stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission latency and level to investigate cochlear mechanics in human ears.

Authors:  Kim S Schairer; John C Ellison; Denis Fitzpatrick; Douglas H Keefe
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Distortion product otoacoustic emissions: cochlear-source contributions and clinical test performance.

Authors:  Tiffany A Johnson; Stephen T Neely; Judy G Kopun; Darcia M Dierking; Hongyang Tan; Connie Converse; Elizabeth Kennedy; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Long-term stability of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Edward M Burns
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Testing coherent reflection in chinchilla: Auditory-nerve responses predict stimulus-frequency emissions.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; Arnold Tubis; Carrick L Talmadge
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Steep and shallow phase gradient distortion product otoacoustic emissions arising basal to the primary tones.

Authors:  Glen K Martin; Barden B Stagner; Paul F Fahey; Brenda L Lonsbury-Martin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Towards a joint reflection-distortion otoacoustic emission profile: Results in normal and impaired ears.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Radha Kalluri
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.