Literature DB >> 21568412

Characterizing distortion-product otoacoustic emission components across four species.

Glen K Martin1, Barden B Stagner, You Sun Chung, Brenda L Lonsbury-Martin.   

Abstract

Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) were measured as level/phase (L/P) maps in humans, rabbits, chinchillas, and rats with and without an interference tone (IT) placed either near the 2f(1)-f(2) DPOAE frequency place (f(dp)) or at one-third of an octave above the f(2) primary tone (1/3-oct IT). Vector differences between with and without IT conditions were computed to derive a residual composed of the DPOAE components removed by the IT. In humans, a DPOAE component could be extracted with the expected steep phase gradient indicative of reflection emissions by ITs near f(dp). In the laboratory species, ITs near f(dp) failed to produce any conclusive evidence for reflection components. For all species, 1/3-oct ITs extracted large DPOAE components presumably generated at or basal to the IT-frequency place that exhibited both distortion- and reflection-like phase properties. Together, these findings suggested that basal distortion components could assume reflection-like phase behavior when the assumptions of cochlear-scaling symmetry, the basis for shallow phase gradients for constant f(2)/f(1) ratio sweeps, are violated. The present results contradict the common belief that DPOAE components associated with steep or shallow phase slopes are unique signatures for reflection emissions arising from f(dp) or distortion emissions generated near f(2), respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21568412      PMCID: PMC3108390          DOI: 10.1121/1.3560123

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  28 in total

1.  Interrelations among distortion-product phase-gradient delays: their connection to scaling symmetry and its breaking.

Authors:  C A Shera; C L Talmadge; A Tubis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Nonlinear interactions that could explain distortion product interference response areas.

Authors:  P F Fahey; B B Stagner; B L Lonsbury-Martin; G K Martin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Sources of distortion product otoacoustic emissions revealed by suppression experiments and inverse fast Fourier transforms in normal ears.

Authors:  D Konrad-Martin; S T Neely; D H Keefe; P A Dorn; M P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Suppression tuning in noise-exposed rabbits.

Authors:  MacKenzie A Howard; Barden B Stagner; Paul K Foster; Brenda L Lonsbury-Martin; Glen K Martin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Wave and place fixed DPOAE maps of the human ear.

Authors:  R D Knight; D T Kemp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Sources of DPOAEs revealed by suppression experiments, inverse fast Fourier transforms, and SFOAEs in impaired ears.

Authors:  Dawn Konrad-Martin; Stephen T Neely; Douglas H Keefe; Patricia A Dorn; Emily Cyr; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Effects of reversible noise exposure on the suppression tuning of rabbit distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  MacKenzie A Howard; Barden B Stagner; Brenda L Lonsbury-Martin; Glen K Martin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Suppression and enhancement of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions by interference tones above f(2). II. Findings in humans.

Authors:  Glen K Martin; Eloy I Villasuso; Barden B Stagner; Brenda L Lonsbury-Martin
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Acoustic distortion products in rabbit ear canal. II. Sites of origin revealed by suppression contours and pure-tone exposures.

Authors:  G K Martin; B L Lonsbury-Martin; R Probst; S A Scheinin; A C Coats
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Stimulus-frequency-emission group delay: a test of coherent reflection filtering and a window on cochlear tuning.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; John J Guinan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  16 in total

1.  Time-domain demonstration of distributed distortion-product otoacoustic emission components.

Authors:  Glen K Martin; Barden B Stagner; Brenda L Lonsbury-Martin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Age Effects on Cochlear Reflectance in Adults.

Authors:  Sara E Fultz; Kenneth I Vaden; Daniel M Rasetshwane; Judy G Kopun; Stephen T Neely; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Meta-Analysis of Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emission Retest Variability for Serial Monitoring of Cochlear Function in Adults.

Authors:  Kelly M Reavis; Garnett P McMillan; Marilyn F Dille; Dawn Konrad-Martin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Tuning of SFOAEs Evoked by Low-Frequency Tones Is Not Compatible with Localized Emission Generation.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-03-27

5.  Characteristics of the 2f(1)-f(2) distortion product otoacoustic emission in a normal hearing population.

Authors:  Gayla L Poling; Jonathan H Siegel; Jungmee Lee; Jungwha Lee; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Long-Term Variability of Distortion-Product Otoacoustic Emissions in Infants and Children and Its Relation to Pediatric Ototoxicity Monitoring.

Authors:  Dawn Konrad-Martin; Kristin Knight; Garnett P McMillan; Laura E Dreisbach; Elsa Nelson; Marilyn Dille
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Relationship Between Behavioral and Stimulus Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions Delay-Based Tuning Estimates.

Authors:  Uzma Shaheen Wilson; Jenna Browning-Kamins; Sriram Boothalingam; Arturo Moleti; Renata Sisto; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Distortion product otoacoustic emissions: Sensitive measures of tympanic -membrane perforation and healing processes in a gerbil model.

Authors:  Wei Dong; Glenna Stomackin; Xiaohui Lin; Glen K Martin; Timothy T Jung
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  A cochlea with three parts? Evidence from otoacoustic emission phase in humans.

Authors:  Anders T Christensen; Carolina Abdala; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Age-related shifts in distortion product otoacoustic emissions peak-ratios and amplitude modulation spectra.

Authors:  Jesyin Lai; Edward L Bartlett
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.