Literature DB >> 18816423

Considerations for design of future cochlear implant electrode arrays: electrode array stiffness, size, and depth of insertion.

Stephen J Rebscher1, Alexander Hetherington, Ben Bonham, Peter Wardrop, David Whinney, Patricia A Leake.   

Abstract

The level of hearing rehabilitation enjoyed by cochlear implant (CI) recipients has increased dramatically since the introduction of these devices. This improvement is the result of continual development of these systems and the inclusion of subjects with less severe auditory pathology. Developments include advanced signal processing, higher stimulation rates, greater numbers of channels, and more efficient electrode arrays that are less likely to produce insertion damage. New directions in the application of CIs, particularly in combined acoustic and electrical stimulation, and increasing performance expectations will place greater demands on future electrode arrays. Specifically, the next generation of arrays must be reliably inserted without damage, must maintain residual acoustic function, and may need to be inserted more deeply. In this study, we measured the mechanical properties of eight clinical and prototype human CI electrode arrays and evaluated insertion trauma and insertion depth in 79 implanted cadaver temporal bones. We found that the size and shape of the array directly affect the incidence of observed trauma. Further, arrays with greater stiffness in the plane perpendicular to the plane of the cochlear spiral are less likely to cause severe trauma than arrays with similar vertical and horizontal stiffness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18816423      PMCID: PMC2562296          DOI: 10.1682/jrrd.2007.08.0119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev        ISSN: 0748-7711


  43 in total

1.  Speech recognition under conditions of frequency-place compression and expansion.

Authors:  Deniz Baskent; Robert V Shannon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Comparative study of cochlear damage with three perimodiolar electrode designs.

Authors:  Adrien A Eshraghi; Nathaniel W Yang; Thomas J Balkany
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Correct tonotopic representation is necessary for complex pitch perception.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Joshua G W Bernstein; Hector Penagos
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-01-12       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Topographic spread of inferior colliculus activation in response to acoustic and intracochlear electric stimulation.

Authors:  Russell L Snyder; Julie A Bierer; John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2004-08-12

5.  Evaluation of the advance off-stylet insertion technique and the cochlear insertion tool in temporal bones.

Authors:  Timo Stöver; Peter Issing; Gerd Graurock; Peter Erfurt; Yasser ElBeltagy; Gerrit Paasche; Thomas Lenarz
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  Interactions between cochlear implant electrode insertion depth and frequency-place mapping.

Authors:  Deniz Başkent; Robert V Shannon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  A temporal bone study of insertion trauma and intracochlear position of cochlear implant electrodes. II: Comparison of Spiral Clarion and HiFocus II electrodes.

Authors:  Peter Wardrop; David Whinney; Stephen J Rebscher; William Luxford; Patricia Leake
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  A temporal bone study of insertion trauma and intracochlear position of cochlear implant electrodes. I: Comparison of Nucleus banded and Nucleus Contour electrodes.

Authors:  Peter Wardrop; David Whinney; Stephen J Rebscher; J Thomas Roland; William Luxford; Patricia A Leake
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Research plan for evaluating subjects presently fitted with implanted auditory prostheses.

Authors:  R C Bilger; F O Black; N T Hopkinson
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl       Date:  1977 May-Jun

10.  Banded intracochlear electrode array: evaluation of insertion trauma in human temporal bones.

Authors:  R K Shepherd; G M Clark; B C Pyman; R L Webb
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1985 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.547

View more
  43 in total

1.  Evaluation of a new slim lateral wall electrode for cochlear implantation: an imaging study in human temporal bones.

Authors:  Aarno Dietz; Matti Iso-Mustajärvi; Sini Sipari; Jyrki Tervaniemi; Dzemal Gazibegovic
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Dual Release Carriers for Cochlear Delivery.

Authors:  Sahar Rahmani; Astin M Ross; Tae-Hong Park; Hakan Durmaz; Acacia F Dishman; Diane M Prieskorn; Nathan Jones; Richard A Altschuler; Joerg Lahann
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 9.933

3.  Radiologic and functional evaluation of electrode dislocation from the scala tympani to the scala vestibuli in patients with cochlear implants.

Authors:  N Fischer; L Pinggera; V Weichbold; D Dejaco; J Schmutzhard; G Widmann
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Recovery from forward masking in cochlear implant listeners depends on stimulation mode, level, and electrode location.

Authors:  Monita Chatterjee; Aditya M Kulkarni
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Micropatterned methacrylate polymers direct spiral ganglion neurite and Schwann cell growth.

Authors:  Joseph C Clarke; Bradley W Tuft; John D Clinger; Rachel Levine; Lucas Sievens Figueroa; C Allan Guymon; Marlan R Hansen
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Visualization, measurement and modelling of the cochlea using rotating midmodiolar slice planes.

Authors:  G Jakob Lexow; Daniel Schurzig; Nils-Claudius Gellrich; Thomas Lenarz; Omid Majdani; Thomas S Rau
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2016-03-19       Impact factor: 2.924

7.  The development of neural stimulators: a review of preclinical safety and efficacy studies.

Authors:  Robert K Shepherd; Joel Villalobos; Owen Burns; David A X Nayagam
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 5.379

8.  Chemical stimulation of adherent cells by localized application of acetylcholine from a microfluidic system.

Authors:  Susanne Zibek; Britta Hagmeyer; Alfred Stett; Martin Stelzle
Journal:  Front Neuroeng       Date:  2010-11-26

Review 9.  Cochlear implants: system design, integration, and evaluation.

Authors:  Fan-Gang Zeng; Stephen Rebscher; William Harrison; Xiaoan Sun; Haihong Feng
Journal:  IEEE Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2008-11-05

Review 10.  The cochlear implant: historical aspects and future prospects.

Authors:  Adrien A Eshraghi; Ronen Nazarian; Fred F Telischi; Suhrud M Rajguru; Eric Truy; Chhavi Gupta
Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 2.064

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.