Literature DB >> 28682084

Recovery from forward masking in cochlear implant listeners depends on stimulation mode, level, and electrode location.

Monita Chatterjee1, Aditya M Kulkarni1.   

Abstract

Psychophysical recovery from forward masking was measured in adult cochlear implant users of CochlearTM and Advanced BionicsTM devices, in monopolar and in focused (bipolar and tripolar) stimulation modes, at four electrode sites across the arrays, and at two levels (loudness balanced across modes and electrodes). Results indicated a steeper psychophysical recovery from forward masking in monopolar over bipolar and tripolar modes, modified by differential effects of electrode and level. The interactions between factors varied somewhat across devices. It is speculated that psychophysical recovery from forward masking may be driven by different populations of neurons in the different modes, with a broader stimulation pattern resulting in a greater likelihood of response by healthier and/or faster-recovering neurons within the stimulated population. If a more rapid recovery from prior stimulation reflects responses of neurons not necessarily close to the activating site, the spectral pattern of the incoming acoustic signal may be distorted. These results have implications for speech processor implementations using different degrees of focusing of the electric field. The primary differences in the shape of the recovery function were observed in the earlier portion (between 2 and 45 ms) of recovery, which is significant in terms of the speech envelope.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28682084      PMCID: PMC5482749          DOI: 10.1121/1.4983156

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  31 in total

1.  Noise enhances modulation sensitivity in cochlear implant listeners: stochastic resonance in a prosthetic sensory system?

Authors:  M Chatterjee; M E Robert
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2001-06

2.  Psychophysical recovery from single-pulse forward masking in electric hearing.

Authors:  D A Nelson; G S Donaldson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Partial tripolar cochlear implant stimulation: Spread of excitation and forward masking in the inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Julie Arenberg Bierer; Steven M Bierer; John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Spiral ganglion cell site of excitation I: comparison of scala tympani and intrameatal electrode responses.

Authors:  Lianne A Cartee; Charles A Miller; Chris van den Honert
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2006-04-18       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Across-site patterns of modulation detection: relation to speech recognition.

Authors:  Soha N Garadat; Teresa A Zwolan; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 6.  Simultaneous inference in general parametric models.

Authors:  Torsten Hothorn; Frank Bretz; Peter Westfall
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.207

7.  Forward masked excitation patterns in multielectrode electrical stimulation.

Authors:  M Chatterjee; R V Shannon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Sensitivity to pulse phase duration in cochlear implant listeners: effects of stimulation mode.

Authors:  Monita Chatterjee; Aditya M Kulkarni
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  An adaptive procedure for subjective judgments.

Authors:  W Jesteadt
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1980-07

10.  A relation between electrode discrimination and amplitude modulation detection by cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Monita Chatterjee; Jian Yu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  2 in total

1.  The effect of a coding strategy that removes temporally masked pulses on speech perception by cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Wiebke Lamping; Tobias Goehring; Jeremy Marozeau; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Recovery from forward masking in cochlear implant listeners: Effects of age and the electrode-neuron interface.

Authors:  Kelly N Jahn; Lindsay DeVries; Julie G Arenberg
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 1.840

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.