Literature DB >> 15492888

Topographic spread of inferior colliculus activation in response to acoustic and intracochlear electric stimulation.

Russell L Snyder1, Julie A Bierer, John C Middlebrooks.   

Abstract

The design of contemporary multichannel cochlear implants is predicated on the presumption that they activate multiple independent sectors of the auditory nerve array. The independence of these channels, however, is limited by the spread of activation from each intracochlear electrode across the auditory nerve array. In this study, we evaluated factors that influence intracochlear spread of activation using two types of intracochlear electrodes: (1) a clinical-type device consisting of a linear series of ring contacts positioned along a silicon elastomer carrier, and (2) a pair of visually placed (VP) ball electrodes that could be positioned independently relative to particular intracochlear structures, e.g., the spiral ganglion. Activation spread was estimated by recording multineuronal evoked activity along the cochleotopic axis of the central nucleus of the inferior colliculus (ICC). This activity was recorded using silicon-based single-shank, 16-site recording probes, which were fixed within the ICC at a depth defined by responses to acoustic tones. After deafening, electric stimuli consisting of single biphasic electric pulses were presented with each electrode type in various stimulation configurations (monopolar, bipolar, tripolar) and/or various electrode orientations (radial, off-radial, longitudinal). The results indicate that monopolar (MP) stimulation with either electrode type produced widepread excitation across the ICC. Bipolar (BP) stimulation with banded pairs of electrodes oriented longitudinally produced activation that was somewhat less broad than MP stimulation, and tripolar (TP) stimulation produced activation that was more restricted than MP or BP stimulation. Bipolar stimulation with radially oriented pairs of VP ball electrodes produced the most restricted activation. The activity patterns evoked by radial VP balls were comparable to those produced by pure tones in normal-hearing animals. Variations in distance between radially oriented VP balls had little effect on activation spread, although increases in interelectrode spacing tended to reduce thresholds. Bipolar stimulation with longitudinally oriented VP electrodes produced broad activation that tended to broaden as the separation between electrodes increased.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15492888      PMCID: PMC2504547          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-004-4026-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  54 in total

1.  Neuronal responses in cat primary auditory cortex to electrical cochlear stimulation. III. Activation patterns in short- and long-term deafness.

Authors:  M W Raggio; C E Schreiner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  A model of the electrically excited human cochlear neuron. II. Influence of the three-dimensional cochlear structure on neural excitability.

Authors:  F Rattay; R N Leao; H Felix
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Immediate changes in tuning of inferior colliculus neurons following acute lesions of cat spiral ganglion.

Authors:  Russell L Snyder; Donal G Sinex
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  The effect of electrode configuration and duration of deafness on threshold and selectivity of responses to intracochlear electrical stimulation.

Authors:  S J Rebscher; R L Snyder; P A Leake
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Acute spiral ganglion lesions change the tuning and tonotopic organization of cat inferior colliculus neurons.

Authors:  R L Snyder; D G Sinex; J D McGee; E W Walsh
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Plasticity in central representations in the inferior colliculus induced by chronic single- vs. two-channel electrical stimulation by a cochlear implant after neonatal deafness.

Authors:  P A Leake; R L Snyder; S J Rebscher; C M Moore; M Vollmer
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Field patterns in a 3D tapered spiral model of the electrically stimulated cochlea.

Authors:  J J Briaire; J H Frijns
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Coding of sound-source location by ensembles of cortical neurons.

Authors:  S Furukawa; L Xu; J C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-02-01       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  A model of the electrically excited human cochlear neuron. I. Contribution of neural substructures to the generation and propagation of spikes.

Authors:  F Rattay; P Lutter; H Felix
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Auditory cortical images of cochlear-implant stimuli: dependence on electrode configuration.

Authors:  Julie Arenberg Bierer; John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  74 in total

1.  Spatial extent of cochlear infrared neural stimulation determined by tone-on-light masking.

Authors:  Agnella Izzo Matic; Joseph T Walsh; Claus-Peter Richter
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 3.170

2.  Monopolar intracochlear pulse trains selectively activate the inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Matthew C Schoenecker; Ben H Bonham; Olga A Stakhovskaya; Russell L Snyder; Patricia A Leake
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-06-22

Review 3.  Probing the electrode-neuron interface with focused cochlear implant stimulation.

Authors:  Julie Arenberg Bierer
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2010-06

4.  Partial tripolar cochlear implant stimulation: Spread of excitation and forward masking in the inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Julie Arenberg Bierer; Steven M Bierer; John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Effects of stimulation mode, level and location on forward-masked excitation patterns in cochlear implant patients.

Authors:  Monita Chatterjee; John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu; Robert V Shannon
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2005-11-04

Review 6.  Phosphene induction by microstimulation of macaque V1.

Authors:  Edward J Tehovnik; Warren M Slocum
Journal:  Brain Res Rev       Date:  2006-12-14

7.  Using evoked potentials to match interaural electrode pairs with bilateral cochlear implants.

Authors:  Zachary M Smith; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-01-17

8.  Cochlear implant electrode configuration effects on activation threshold and tonotopic selectivity.

Authors:  Russell L Snyder; John C Middlebrooks; Ben H Bonham
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-10-11       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Electrophysiological validation of a human prototype auditory midbrain implant in a guinea pig model.

Authors:  Minoo Lenarz; Hubert H Lim; James F Patrick; David J Anderson; Thomas Lenarz
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2006-10-31

10.  A relation between electrode discrimination and amplitude modulation detection by cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Monita Chatterjee; Jian Yu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.