Literature DB >> 15855030

A temporal bone study of insertion trauma and intracochlear position of cochlear implant electrodes. I: Comparison of Nucleus banded and Nucleus Contour electrodes.

Peter Wardrop1, David Whinney, Stephen J Rebscher, J Thomas Roland, William Luxford, Patricia A Leake.   

Abstract

In recent years, new designs of cochlear implant electrodes have been introduced in an attempt to improve efficiency and performance by locating stimulation sites closer to spiral ganglion neurons and deeper into the scala tympani. The goal of this study was to document insertion depth, intracochlear position and insertion trauma with the Nucleus Contour electrode and to compare results to those observed with the earlier generation Nucleus banded electrode. For this comparison eight Nuclears banded electrodes and 18 Contour electrodes were implanted in cadaver temporal bones using a realistic surgical exposure. Two experienced cochlear implant surgeons and two otology fellows with specialized training in cochlear implant surgery were selected for the study to represent a range of surgical experience similar to that of surgeons currently performing the procedure throughout the world. Following insertion of the electrodes, specimens were imaged using plain film X-ray, embedded in acrylic resin, cut in radial sections with the electrodes in place, and each cut surface was polished. Insertion depth was measured in digitized X-ray images, and trauma was assessed in each cross-section. The Contour electrode inserted more deeply (mean depth=17.9 mm or 417 degrees ) than the banded electrode (mean depth=15.3 mm or 285 degrees ). The incidence and severity of trauma varied substantially among the temporal bones studied. However, the nature and frequency of injuries observed with the two devices were very similar. The Contour electrode was clearly positioned closer to the modiolus than the banded model, and also appeared easier to use. Based on this difference in position and data from previous studies we conclude that the Contour electrode may provide lower thresholds and improved channel selectivity, but the incidence of trauma remains a problem with the newer design. The relative influences of electrode positioning and neural degeneration that may result from trauma are as yet unclear.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15855030     DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2004.11.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  41 in total

Review 1.  Probing the electrode-neuron interface with focused cochlear implant stimulation.

Authors:  Julie Arenberg Bierer
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2010-06

2.  Factors associated with incomplete insertion of electrodes in cochlear implant surgery: a histopathologic study.

Authors:  Joonhan Lee; Joseph B Nadol; Donald K Eddington
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2010-06-19       Impact factor: 1.854

3.  Topographic spread of inferior colliculus activation in response to acoustic and intracochlear electric stimulation.

Authors:  Russell L Snyder; Julie A Bierer; John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2004-08-12

Review 4.  The development of the Nucleus Freedom Cochlear implant system.

Authors:  James F Patrick; Peter A Busby; Peter J Gibson
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2006-12

5.  A frequency-position function for the human cochlear spiral ganglion.

Authors:  Divya Sridhar; Olga Stakhovskaya; Patricia A Leake
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2006-10-06       Impact factor: 1.854

6.  Frequency map for the human cochlear spiral ganglion: implications for cochlear implants.

Authors:  Olga Stakhovskaya; Divya Sridhar; Ben H Bonham; Patricia A Leake
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-02-21

7.  Cochlear implant electrode configuration effects on activation threshold and tonotopic selectivity.

Authors:  Russell L Snyder; John C Middlebrooks; Ben H Bonham
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-10-11       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Anatomy of the round window and hook region of the cochlea with implications for cochlear implantation and other endocochlear surgical procedures.

Authors:  Peter M M C Li; Haobing Wang; Clarinda Northrop; Saumil N Merchant; Joseph B Nadol
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.311

9.  The development of neural stimulators: a review of preclinical safety and efficacy studies.

Authors:  Robert K Shepherd; Joel Villalobos; Owen Burns; David A X Nayagam
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 5.379

10.  Role of electrode placement as a contributor to variability in cochlear implant outcomes.

Authors:  Charles C Finley; Timothy A Holden; Laura K Holden; Bruce R Whiting; Richard A Chole; Gail J Neely; Timothy E Hullar; Margaret W Skinner
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.311

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.