Literature DB >> 16272935

Evaluation of the advance off-stylet insertion technique and the cochlear insertion tool in temporal bones.

Timo Stöver1, Peter Issing, Gerd Graurock, Peter Erfurt, Yasser ElBeltagy, Gerrit Paasche, Thomas Lenarz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The concept and design of new cochlear implant electrodes is a challenging process. To evaluate new electrode designs, we present a study that uses a microgrinding procedure to evaluate damage to the microstructures of the cochlea resulting from the insertion procedure. In this study, we compared different insertion techniques with the Contour electrode with Softip for placement inside the cochlea and any resulting damage.
METHODS: Twenty-five fresh frozen human temporal bones were used to compare electrode insertion characteristics with three insertion techniques (i.e., conventional insertion, Advance Off-Stylet performed manually, and Advance Off-Stylet performed with insertion tool) and two prototype variants of the Contour electrode with Softip (referred as Softip I and Softip II in this article). Five temporal bones were used for each arm of the study: Softip I electrode and conventional insertion; Softip I electrode and manual Advance Off-Stylet insertion; Softip I electrode and Advance Off-Stylet insertion with an early experimental insertion tool; Softip II prototype electrode and manual Advance Off-Stylet insertion; and Softip II prototype and Advance Off-Stylet insertion with a prototype insertion tool. The temporal bones were dehydrated and embedded in epoxy and used for the microgrinding procedure. Resulting images were documented and compared with conventional radiographic images.
RESULTS: Our results showed that, especially when using the conventional insertion technique with Softip I electrode arrays, basilar membrane perforations were observable. Using the prototype insertion tool, good placement of the electrode array but also two basilar membrane perforations (one with each type of electrode) were observed. In contrast, the Advance Off-Stylet insertion technique did not show basilar membrane perforation with Softip I and II electrodes and resulted in reliable perimodiolar placement of the arrays.
CONCLUSION: Using microgrinding of temporal bones, the Advance Off-Stylet insertion technique was proven to enable more atraumatic insertions of Contour electrodes with Softip and to provide very reliable perimodiolar placements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16272935     DOI: 10.1097/01.mao.0000179527.17285.85

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  17 in total

1.  [Vestibular dysfunction after cochlear implant in adults].

Authors:  F Holinski; F Elhajzein; G Scholz; B Sedlmaier
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  In vitro and in vivo pharmacokinetic study of a dexamethasone-releasing silicone for cochlear implants.

Authors:  Ya Liu; Claude Jolly; Susanne Braun; Thomas Stark; Elias Scherer; Stefan K Plontke; Jan Kiefer
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 3.  Soft cochlear implantation: rationale for the surgical approach.

Authors:  David R Friedland; Christina Runge-Samuelson
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2009-06

4.  [Cochlear implants in isolated temporal bones: evaluation of electrode position with 64-slice computed tomography].

Authors:  J H Wagner; G Rademacher; A Ernst; I Todt
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  An automated insertion tool for cochlear implants: another step towards atraumatic cochlear implant surgery.

Authors:  Andreas Hussong; Thomas S Rau; Tobias Ortmaier; Bodo Heimann; Thomas Lenarz; Omid Majdani
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2009-06-13       Impact factor: 2.924

6.  Automated insertion of preformed cochlear implant electrodes: evaluation of curling behaviour and insertion forces on an artificial cochlear model.

Authors:  Thomas S Rau; Andreas Hussong; Martin Leinung; Thomas Lenarz; Omid Majdani
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2009-04-10       Impact factor: 2.924

7.  Considerations for design of future cochlear implant electrode arrays: electrode array stiffness, size, and depth of insertion.

Authors:  Stephen J Rebscher; Alexander Hetherington; Ben Bonham; Peter Wardrop; David Whinney; Patricia A Leake
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2008

8.  Reliability of cone beam computed tomography in scalar localization of the electrode array: a radio histological study.

Authors:  Mathieu Marx; Frank Risi; Bernard Escudé; Irfan Durmo; Christopher James; Frédéric Lauwers; Olivier Deguine; Bernard Fraysse
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  Insertion trauma of a cochlear implant electrode array with Nitinol inlay.

Authors:  Thomas S Rau; Lenka Harbach; Nick Pawsey; Marcel Kluge; Peter Erfurt; Thomas Lenarz; Omid Majdani
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 10.  Cochlear implants: system design, integration, and evaluation.

Authors:  Fan-Gang Zeng; Stephen Rebscher; William Harrison; Xiaoan Sun; Haihong Feng
Journal:  IEEE Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2008-11-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.