Literature DB >> 14718671

Correct tonotopic representation is necessary for complex pitch perception.

Andrew J Oxenham1, Joshua G W Bernstein, Hector Penagos.   

Abstract

The ability to extract a pitch from complex harmonic sounds, such as human speech, animal vocalizations, and musical instruments, is a fundamental attribute of hearing. Some theories of pitch rely on the frequency-to-place mapping, or tonotopy, in the inner ear (cochlea), but most current models are based solely on the relative timing of spikes in the auditory nerve. So far, it has proved to be difficult to distinguish between these two possible representations, primarily because temporal and place information usually covary in the cochlea. In this study, "transposed stimuli" were used to dissociate temporal from place information. By presenting the temporal information of low-frequency sinusoids to locations in the cochlea tuned to high frequencies, we found that human subjects displayed poor pitch perception for single tones. More importantly, none of the subjects was able to extract the fundamental frequency from multiple low-frequency harmonics presented to high-frequency regions of the cochlea. The experiments demonstrate that tonotopic representation is crucial to complex pitch perception and provide a new tool in the search for the neural basis of pitch.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14718671      PMCID: PMC337068          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0306958101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  44 in total

Review 1.  Auditory processing of interaural timing information: new insights.

Authors:  L R Bernstein
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2001-12-15       Impact factor: 4.164

2.  Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception.

Authors:  Zachary M Smith; Bertrand Delgutte; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-03-07       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Encoding of the temporal regularity of sound in the human brainstem.

Authors:  T D Griffiths; S Uppenkamp; I Johnsrude; O Josephs; R D Patterson
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Neuromagnetic evidence for a pitch processing center in Heschl's gyrus.

Authors:  K Krumbholz; R D Patterson; A Seither-Preisler; C Lammertmann; B Lütkenhöner
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Time-domain modeling of peripheral auditory processing: a modular architecture and a software platform.

Authors:  R D Patterson; M H Allerhand; C Giguère
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Pseudospontaneous activity: stochastic independence of auditory nerve fibers with electrical stimulation.

Authors:  J T Rubinstein; B S Wilson; C C Finley; P J Abbas
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Pitch, consonance, and harmony.

Authors:  E Terhardt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues.

Authors:  R V Shannon; F G Zeng; V Kamath; J Wygonski; M Ekelid
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-10-13       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Speech processing in the auditory system. I: The representation of speech sounds in the responses of the auditory nerve.

Authors:  S A Shamma
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Perception of missing fundamental by a species of songbird (Sturnus vulgaris).

Authors:  J Cynx; M Shapiro
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 2.231

View more
  89 in total

1.  Revisiting place and temporal theories of pitch.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Acoust Sci Technol       Date:  2013

2.  Topographic organization is essential for pitch perception.

Authors:  Shihab A Shamma
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-01-26       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Pitch contour identification with combined place and temporal cues using cochlear implants.

Authors:  Xin Luo; Monica Padilla; David M Landsberger
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Improving melody recognition in cochlear implant recipients through individualized frequency map fitting.

Authors:  Walter Di Nardo; Alessandro Scorpecci; Sara Giannantonio; Francesca Cianfrone; Gaetano Paludetti
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-07-16       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  The effects of frequency-place shift on consonant confusion in cochlear implant simulations.

Authors:  Ning Zhou; Li Xu; Chao-Yang Lee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  An autocorrelation model with place dependence to account for the effect of harmonic number on fundamental frequency discrimination.

Authors:  Joshua G W Bernstein; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Phase locking of auditory-nerve fibers to the envelopes of high-frequency sounds: implications for sound localization.

Authors:  Anna Dreyer; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-06-28       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  [Experiments on prosody perception with cochlear implants].

Authors:  H Meister; D Tepeli; P Wagner; W Hess; M Walger; H von Wedel; R Lang-Roth
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.284

9.  Effect of age at onset of deafness on binaural sensitivity in electric hearing in humans.

Authors:  Ruth Y Litovsky; Gary L Jones; Smita Agrawal; Richard van Hoesel
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 10.  Trends in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2004
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.