Literature DB >> 19946565

Cochlear implants: system design, integration, and evaluation.

Fan-Gang Zeng1, Stephen Rebscher, William Harrison, Xiaoan Sun, Haihong Feng.   

Abstract

As the most successful neural prosthesis, cochlear implants have provided partial hearing to more than 120000 persons worldwide; half of which being pediatric users who are able to develop nearly normal language. Biomedical engineers have played a central role in the design, integration and evaluation of the cochlear implant system, but the overall success is a result of collaborative work with physiologists, psychologists, physicians, educators, and entrepreneurs. This review presents broad yet in-depth academic and industrial perspectives on the underlying research and ongoing development of cochlear implants. The introduction accounts for major events and advances in cochlear implants, including dynamic interplays among engineers, scientists, physicians, and policy makers. The review takes a system approach to address critical issues in cochlear implant research and development. First, the cochlear implant system design and specifications are laid out. Second, the design goals, principles, and methods of the subsystem components are identified from the external speech processor and radio frequency transmission link to the internal receiver, stimulator and electrode arrays. Third, system integration and functional evaluation are presented with respect to safety, reliability, and challenges facing the present and future cochlear implant designers and users. Finally, issues beyond cochlear implants are discussed to address treatment options for the entire spectrum of hearing impairment as well as to use the cochlear implant as a model to design and evaluate other similar neural prostheses such as vestibular and retinal implants.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auditory prosthesis; auditory brainstem; auditory nerve; biocompatibility; biomaterials; current source; electric stimulation; electrode; fine structure; hermetic sealing; loudness; music perception; pitch; radio frequency; safety; signal processing; speech recognition; temporal resolution

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19946565      PMCID: PMC2782849          DOI: 10.1109/RBME.2008.2008250

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Rev Biomed Eng        ISSN: 1937-3333


  187 in total

1.  The effect of electrode configuration and duration of deafness on threshold and selectivity of responses to intracochlear electrical stimulation.

Authors:  S J Rebscher; R L Snyder; P A Leake
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Amplitude mapping and phoneme recognition in cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  F G Zeng; J J Galvin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Acoustic model investigation of a multiple carrier frequency algorithm for encoding fine frequency structure: implications for cochlear implants.

Authors:  Chandra S Throckmorton; M Selin Kucukoglu; Jeremiah J Remus; Leslie M Collins
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2006-06-23       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  A novel stimulus artifact removal technique for high-rate electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Leon F Heffer; James B Fallon
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2008-02-03       Impact factor: 2.390

5.  Temporal bone results and hearing preservation with a new straight electrode.

Authors:  Thomas Lenarz; Timo Stover; Andreas Buechner; Gerrit Paasche; Robert Briggs; Frank Risi; Joerg Pesch; Rolf-Dieter Battmer
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2006-10-06       Impact factor: 1.854

6.  Acoustic parameters measured by a formant-estimating speech processor for a multiple-channel cochlear implant.

Authors:  P J Blamey; R C Dowell; G M Clark; P M Seligman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Speech discrimination in deaf subjects with cochlear implants.

Authors:  D K Eddington
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 8.  Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve and auditory prostheses: a review of the literature.

Authors:  R C Bilger
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl       Date:  1977 May-Jun

Review 9.  Auditory brainstem implants.

Authors:  Marc S Schwartz; Steven R Otto; Robert V Shannon; William E Hitselberger; Derald E Brackmann
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 7.620

10.  The recognition of sentences in noise by normal-hearing listeners using simulations of cochlear-implant signal processors with 6-20 channels.

Authors:  M F Dorman; P C Loizou; J Fitzke; Z Tu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  127 in total

1.  Piezoelectric materials mimic the function of the cochlear sensory epithelium.

Authors:  Takatoshi Inaoka; Hirofumi Shintaku; Takayuki Nakagawa; Satoyuki Kawano; Hideaki Ogita; Tatsunori Sakamoto; Shinji Hamanishi; Hiroshi Wada; Juichi Ito
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Cochlear implant users' spectral ripple resolution.

Authors:  Eun Kyung Jeon; Christopher W Turner; Sue A Karsten; Belinda A Henry; Bruce J Gantz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Early unilateral cochlear implantation promotes mature cortical asymmetries in adolescents who are deaf.

Authors:  Salima Jiwani; Blake C Papsin; Karen A Gordon
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Cochlear Implant Reliability: On the Reporting of Rates of Revision Surgery.

Authors:  Graham O'Neill; Neil S Tolley
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-04-01

5.  AAV-Mediated Neurotrophin Gene Therapy Promotes Improved Survival of Cochlear Spiral Ganglion Neurons in Neonatally Deafened Cats: Comparison of AAV2-hBDNF and AAV5-hGDNF.

Authors:  Patricia A Leake; Stephen J Rebscher; Chantale Dore'; Omar Akil
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-06-20

6.  Spatial channel interactions in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Qing Tang; Raul Benítez; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 5.379

7.  Behavioral training enhances cortical temporal processing in neonatally deafened juvenile cats.

Authors:  Ralph E Beitel; Maike Vollmer; Marcia W Raggio; Christoph E Schreiner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Optogenetic stimulation of the auditory nerve.

Authors:  Victor H Hernandez; Anna Gehrt; Zhizi Jing; Gerhard Hoch; Marcus Jeschke; Nicola Strenzke; Tobias Moser
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 1.355

9.  Acoustic temporal modulation detection in normal-hearing and cochlear implanted listeners: effects of hearing mechanism and development.

Authors:  Min-Hyun Park; Jong Ho Won; David L Horn; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-03-20

10.  The Lombard effect observed in speech produced by cochlear implant users in noisy environments: A naturalistic study.

Authors:  Jaewook Lee; Hussnain Ali; Ali Ziaei; Emily A Tobey; John H L Hansen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.