Literature DB >> 25430856

Radiologic and functional evaluation of electrode dislocation from the scala tympani to the scala vestibuli in patients with cochlear implants.

N Fischer1, L Pinggera1, V Weichbold2, D Dejaco1, J Schmutzhard3, G Widmann4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Localization of the electrode after cochlear implantation seems to have an impact on auditory outcome, and conebeam CT has emerged as a reliable method for visualizing the electrode array position within the cochlea. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the frequency and clinical impact of scalar dislocation of various electrodes and surgical approaches and to evaluate its influence on auditory outcome.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective single-center study analyzed a consecutive series of 63 cochlear implantations with various straight electrodes. The placement of the electrode array was evaluated by using multiplanar reconstructed conebeam CT images. For the auditory outcome, we compared the aided hearing thresholds and the charge units of maximum comfortable loudness level at weeks 6, 12, and 24 after implantation.
RESULTS: In 7.9% of the cases, the electrode array showed scalar dislocation. In all cases, the electrode array penetrated the basal membrane within 45° of the electrode insertion. All 3 cases of cochleostomy were dislocated in the first 45° segment. No hearing differences were noted, but the charge units of maximum comfortable loudness level seemed to increase with time in patients with dislocations.
CONCLUSIONS: The intracochlear dislocation rate of various straight electrodes detected by conebeam CT images is relatively low. Scalar dislocation may not negatively influence the hearing threshold but may require an increase of the necessary stimulus charge and should be reported by the radiologist.
© 2015 by American Journal of Neuroradiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25430856      PMCID: PMC7965666          DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4189

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  23 in total

1.  A silastic positioner for a modiolus-hugging position of intracochlear electrodes: electrophysiologic effects.

Authors:  S M Cords; G Reuter; P R Issing; A Sommer; J Kuzma; T Lenarz
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  2000-03

2.  Cone beam computed tomography, a low-dose imaging technique in the postoperative assessment of cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Joana Ruivo; Koen Mermuys; Klaus Bacher; Rudolf Kuhweide; Erwin Offeciers; Jan W Casselman
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.311

3.  Is electrode-modiolus distance a prognostic factor for hearing performances after cochlear implant surgery?

Authors:  Gonzalo N Esquia Medina; Stéphanie Borel; Yann Nguyen; Emmanuèle Ambert-Dahan; Evelyne Ferrary; Olivier Sterkers; Alexis Bozorg Grayeli
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 1.854

4.  Considerations for design of future cochlear implant electrode arrays: electrode array stiffness, size, and depth of insertion.

Authors:  Stephen J Rebscher; Alexander Hetherington; Ben Bonham; Peter Wardrop; David Whinney; Patricia A Leake
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2008

5.  Artifacts of the electrode in cochlea implantation and limits in analysis of deep insertion in cone beam tomography (CBT).

Authors:  C Güldner; S Wiegand; R Weiss; S Bien; A Sesterhenn; A Teymoortash; I Diogo
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-07-30       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 6.  Factors affecting auditory performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants.

Authors:  P Blamey; P Arndt; F Bergeron; G Bredberg; J Brimacombe; G Facer; J Larky; B Lindström; J Nedzelski; A Peterson; D Shipp; S Staller; L Whitford
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  1996 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.854

7.  Factors affecting auditory performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants: an update with 2251 patients.

Authors:  Peter Blamey; Françoise Artieres; Deniz Başkent; François Bergeron; Andy Beynon; Elaine Burke; Norbert Dillier; Richard Dowell; Bernard Fraysse; Stéphane Gallégo; Paul J Govaerts; Kevin Green; Alexander M Huber; Andrea Kleine-Punte; Bert Maat; Mathieu Marx; Deborah Mawman; Isabelle Mosnier; Alec Fitzgerald O'Connor; Stephen O'Leary; Alexandra Rousset; Karen Schauwers; Henryk Skarzynski; Piotr H Skarzynski; Olivier Sterkers; Assia Terranti; Eric Truy; Paul Van de Heyning; Fréderic Venail; Christophe Vincent; Diane S Lazard
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2012-10-19       Impact factor: 1.854

8.  Role of electrode placement as a contributor to variability in cochlear implant outcomes.

Authors:  Charles C Finley; Timothy A Holden; Laura K Holden; Bruce R Whiting; Richard A Chole; Gail J Neely; Timothy E Hullar; Margaret W Skinner
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.311

9.  Scalar localization of the electrode array after cochlear implantation: clinical experience using 64-slice multidetector computed tomography.

Authors:  John I Lane; Robert J Witte; Colin L W Driscoll; Jon K Shallop; Charles W Beatty; Andrew N Primak
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  Imaging of electrode position in relation to electrode functioning after cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Gijs K A van Wermeskerken; Adriaan F van Olphen; Kees Graamans
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 2.503

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Review on cochlear implant electrode array tip fold-over and scalar deviation.

Authors:  Anandhan Dhanasingh; Claude Jolly
Journal:  J Otol       Date:  2019-01-09

2.  Angular Electrode Insertion Depth and Speech Perception in Adults With a Cochlear Implant: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Floris Heutink; Simone R de Rijk; Berit M Verbist; Wendy J Huinck; Emmanuel A M Mylanus
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.311

3.  Radiological evaluation of a new straight electrode array compared to its precursors.

Authors:  Manuel Christoph Ketterer; A Aschendorff; S Arndt; I Speck; A K Rauch; R Beck; F Hassepass
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Suitable Electrode Choice for Robotic-Assisted Cochlear Implant Surgery: A Systematic Literature Review of Manual Electrode Insertion Adverse Events.

Authors:  Paul Van de Heyning; Peter Roland; Luis Lassaletta; Sumit Agrawal; Marcus Atlas; Wolf-Dieter Baumgartner; Kevin Brown; Marco Caversaccio; Stefan Dazert; Wolfgang Gstoettner; Rudolf Hagen; Abdulrahman Hagr; Greg Eigner Jablonski; Mohan Kameswaran; Vladislav Kuzovkov; Martin Leinung; Yongxin Li; Andreas Loth; Astrid Magele; Robert Mlynski; Joachim Mueller; Lorne Parnes; Andreas Radeloff; Chris Raine; Gunesh Rajan; Joachim Schmutzhard; Henryk Skarzynski; Piotr H Skarzynski; Georg Sprinzl; Hinrich Staecker; Timo Stöver; Dayse Tavora-Viera; Vedat Topsakal; Shin-Ichi Usami; Vincent Van Rompaey; Nora M Weiss; Wilhelm Wimmer; Mario Zernotti; Javier Gavilan
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-03-24

Review 5.  The importance of electrode location in cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Brendan P O'Connell; Jacob B Hunter; George B Wanna
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-11-29

6.  Cone beam CT for perioperative imaging in hearing preservation Cochlear implantation - a human cadaveric study.

Authors:  Kayvan Nateghifard; David Low; Lola Awofala; Dilakshan Srikanthan; Jafri Kuthubutheen; Michael Daly; Harley Chan; Jonathan Irish; Joseph Chen; Vincent Lin; Trung Ngoc Le
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2019-11-21
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.