Literature DB >> 15855031

A temporal bone study of insertion trauma and intracochlear position of cochlear implant electrodes. II: Comparison of Spiral Clarion and HiFocus II electrodes.

Peter Wardrop1, David Whinney, Stephen J Rebscher, William Luxford, Patricia Leake.   

Abstract

In recent years, several new designs of cochlear implant electrodes have been introduced clinically with the goal of optimizing perimodiolar placement of stimulation sites. Previous studies suggest that perimodiolar electrodes may increase both the efficiency and performance of a cochlear implant. This is the second of two studies designed to examine the positioning of electrodes and the occurrence of insertion-related injury with these newer designs and to directly compare two perimodiolar electrodes to their predecessors. In our previous report we compared the Nucleus banded electrode with the Nucleus Contour perimodiolar electrode. In the present study, using the same protocol, we examine the Spiral Clarion electrode and its successor, the HiFocus II electrode with attached positioner. Eight Spiral Clarion arrays and 20 HiFocus II electrodes with positioners were inserted into human cadaver temporal bones. Following insertion, the specimens were embedded in acrylic resin, cut in quarters with a diamond saw and polished. Insertion depth, proximity to the modiolus and trauma were evaluated in X-ray images and light microscopy. The newer electrode was consistently positioned closer to the modiolus than the previous device whereas the angular depth of insertion measured for the two electrodes was similar. The incidence of trauma was minimal when either electrode was inserted to a depth of less than 400 degrees . However, severe trauma was observed in every case in which the HiFocus II with positioner was inserted beyond 400 degrees and in some cases in which the Spiral Clarion was inserted beyond 400 degrees . To evaluate the possible role of electrode size in the trauma observed we modeled both devices relative to the dimensions of the scala tympani. We found that the fully inserted HiFocus II electrode with positioner was larger than the scala tympani in approximately 70% of temporal bones measured. The results suggest that both the Clarion spiral and HiFocus II with positioner can be inserted with minimal trauma, but in many cases not to the maximum depth allowed by the design.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15855031     DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2004.11.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  28 in total

Review 1.  Probing the electrode-neuron interface with focused cochlear implant stimulation.

Authors:  Julie Arenberg Bierer
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2010-06

2.  A frequency-position function for the human cochlear spiral ganglion.

Authors:  Divya Sridhar; Olga Stakhovskaya; Patricia A Leake
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2006-10-06       Impact factor: 1.854

3.  Frequency map for the human cochlear spiral ganglion: implications for cochlear implants.

Authors:  Olga Stakhovskaya; Divya Sridhar; Ben H Bonham; Patricia A Leake
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-02-21

4.  Cochlear implant electrode configuration effects on activation threshold and tonotopic selectivity.

Authors:  Russell L Snyder; John C Middlebrooks; Ben H Bonham
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-10-11       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 5.  Soft cochlear implantation: rationale for the surgical approach.

Authors:  David R Friedland; Christina Runge-Samuelson
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2009-06

6.  Automated insertion of preformed cochlear implant electrodes: evaluation of curling behaviour and insertion forces on an artificial cochlear model.

Authors:  Thomas S Rau; Andreas Hussong; Martin Leinung; Thomas Lenarz; Omid Majdani
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2009-04-10       Impact factor: 2.924

7.  Considerations for design of future cochlear implant electrode arrays: electrode array stiffness, size, and depth of insertion.

Authors:  Stephen J Rebscher; Alexander Hetherington; Ben Bonham; Peter Wardrop; David Whinney; Patricia A Leake
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2008

8.  Cochlear Histopathology as Observed in Two Patients With a Cochlear Implant Electrode With Positioner.

Authors:  Takefumi Kamakura; Joseph B Nadol
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.311

9.  Role of electrode placement as a contributor to variability in cochlear implant outcomes.

Authors:  Charles C Finley; Timothy A Holden; Laura K Holden; Bruce R Whiting; Richard A Chole; Gail J Neely; Timothy E Hullar; Margaret W Skinner
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 10.  Cochlear implants: system design, integration, and evaluation.

Authors:  Fan-Gang Zeng; Stephen Rebscher; William Harrison; Xiaoan Sun; Haihong Feng
Journal:  IEEE Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2008-11-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.