Literature DB >> 15756572

Dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry: a comparative study.

Mona Pache1, Sonja Wilmsmeyer, Sonja Lautebach, Jens Funk.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Various sources of error, including central corneal thickness (CCT) and structural corneal rigidity, have been proposed for Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT). The Pascal dynamic contour tonometer (DCT) is a novel device designed for intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements assumed to be largely independent of CCT and corneal curvature. We compared DCT with GAT in eyes with normal corneas of various thickness.
METHODS: We prospectively measured IOP using DCT and GAT in random order in 100 eyes of 100 subjects (M:F=46:54; mean age 42+/-19, range 23-88 years).
RESULTS: Mean DCT values were about 1 mm Hg higher than GAT readings (16+/-3 vs 15+/-3 mmHg, p=0.001). Bland-Altman analysis of individual pairs of DCT and GAT measurements revealed a bias of -1.0 mmHg [95% confidence interval (CI): +/-1.2]. Neither GAT nor DCT showed a significant correlation with CCT (533+/-48, range 399-641 microm).
CONCLUSIONS: In eyes with normal corneas, DCT allows suitable and reliable IOP measurements which are in good concordance with GAT. Comparison of DCT with intracameral manometry is desirable in the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15756572     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-005-1124-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  31 in total

1.  [Further contribution to applanation tonometry].

Authors:  H GOLDMANN; T SCHMIDT
Journal:  Ophthalmologica       Date:  1961-06       Impact factor: 3.250

2.  [Applanation tonometry].

Authors:  H GOLDMANN; T SCHMIDT
Journal:  Ophthalmologica       Date:  1957-10       Impact factor: 3.250

3.  Distribution of central corneal thickness and its association with intraocular pressure: The Rotterdam Study.

Authors:  R C Wolfs; C C Klaver; J R Vingerling; D E Grobbee; A Hofman; P T de Jong
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 5.258

4.  The effect of excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy on intraocular pressure measurements using the Goldmann applanation tonometer.

Authors:  P G Mardelli; L W Piebenga; M M Whitacre; K D Siegmund
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  The effect of corneal thickness on applanation tonometry.

Authors:  M M Whitacre; R A Stein; K Hassanein
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1993-05-15       Impact factor: 5.258

Review 7.  Sources of error with use of Goldmann-type tonometers.

Authors:  M M Whitacre; R Stein
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  1993 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.048

8.  Intraocular pressure measurements using dynamic contour tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  Claude Kaufmann; Lucas M Bachmann; Michael A Thiel
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 9.  Corneal thickness in glaucoma screening, diagnosis, and management.

Authors:  James D Brandt
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.761

10.  Changes in intraocular pressure after laser in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  K M Rashad; A A Bahnassy
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.573

View more
  27 in total

1.  The influence of soft contact lenses on the intraocular pressure measurement.

Authors:  P G Firat; C Cankaya; S Doganay; M Cavdar; S Duman; E Ozsoy; B Koc
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 2.  [Dynamic contour tonometry].

Authors:  C Kniestedt; H E Kanngiesser
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  Dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) versus Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) - a comparison of agreement and reproducibility.

Authors:  Sonja Herdener; Mona Pache; Sonja Lautebach; Jens Funk
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-12-20       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  [Influence of residual corneal bed thickness after myopic LASIK on intraocular pressure measurements. Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry].

Authors:  L Muller; T Kohnen
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.059

5.  [Evaluation of dynamic contour tonometry in penetrating keratoplasties].

Authors:  An Viestenz; A Langenbucher; B Seitz; Ar Viestenz
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.059

6.  [Mobile intraocular pressure measurement. From palpation to initial clinical experience with the handheld dynamic contour tonometer].

Authors:  U Schmid; C Kniestedt
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.059

7.  Evaluation of a contact lens-embedded sensor for intraocular pressure measurement.

Authors:  Michael D Twa; Cynthia J Roberts; Huikai J Karol; Ashraf M Mahmoud; Paul A Weber; Robert H Small
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Physiological diurnal variability and characteristics of the ocular pulse amplitude (OPA) with the dynamic contour tonometer (DCT-Pascal).

Authors:  Sayeh Pourjavan; Pierre-Yves Boëlle; Michéle Detry-Morel; Patrick De Potter
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-10-23       Impact factor: 2.031

9.  [Evaluation of dynamic contour tonometry in keratoconus].

Authors:  N Schädle; J D Unterlauft; T Klink; G Geerling
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.059

10.  Comparison of Goldmann applanation and dynamic contour tonometry in a population of Mexican open-angle glaucoma patients.

Authors:  J Jimenez-Roman; F Gil-Carrasco; A Martinez; O Albis-Donado; J D De la Torre-Tovar
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 2.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.