Literature DB >> 11471999

Changes in intraocular pressure after laser in situ keratomileusis.

K M Rashad1, A A Bahnassy.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate changes in intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements by Goldmann applanation tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for myopia and myopic astigmatism, and to assess the accuracy of Goldmann applanation tonometry measurements after LASIK in these eyes.
METHODS: LASIK was performed on 166 eyes of 93 patients for correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism. Intraocular pressure was measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry at the central and temporal parts of the cornea before and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after LASIK. The amount of change in IOP was computed and its relation to different variables was evaluated by regression analysis.
RESULTS: Intraocular pressure measured at the center of the cornea was reduced by a mean of 3.69 +/- 1.63 mmHg after LASIK. Multiple regression analysis showed that the decrease in IOP was related to the preoperative IOP and the change in central corneal thickness after LASIK. Measurements of IOP at the temporal part of the cornea were also reduced by a mean of 2.39 +/- 1.71 mmHg. There was wide variability in the amount of difference between the temporal and central measurements after LASIK (temporal measurements were higher than central by 0 to +4 mmHg).
CONCLUSION: LASIK for myopia produced underestimation of IOP measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry at the central part of the cornea by a mean of 3.69 +/- 1.63 mmHg. The decrease of IOP was related to preoperative IOP and the change in central corneal thickness after LASIK. Temporal Goldmann applanation tonometry measurements, although decreased after LASIK, were less reliable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11471999     DOI: 10.3928/1081-597X-20010701-03

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Refract Surg        ISSN: 1081-597X            Impact factor:   3.573


  7 in total

1.  Comparison between Pascal dynamic contour tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer after different types of refractive surgery.

Authors:  Antonios P Aristeidou; Georgios Labiris; Andreas Katsanos; Michalis Fanariotis; Nikitas C Foudoulakis; Vassilios P Kozobolis
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Circadian variations in central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure in patients with glaucoma.

Authors:  P Fogagnolo; L Rossetti; F Mazzolani; N Orzalesi
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  [Mobile intraocular pressure measurement. From palpation to initial clinical experience with the handheld dynamic contour tonometer].

Authors:  U Schmid; C Kniestedt
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.059

4.  Dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry: a comparative study.

Authors:  Mona Pache; Sonja Wilmsmeyer; Sonja Lautebach; Jens Funk
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-03-09       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  [Alterations in intraocular pressure and the CorVis parameters after LASIK].

Authors:  A Anton; M Neuburger; J F Jordan; T Wecker; J Lübke; S Heinzelmann; T Lapp; D Böhringer; T Reinhard; P Maier
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.059

6.  A comparison between Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry after photorefractive keratectomy.

Authors:  Afshin Lotfi Sadigh; Rohollah F Fouladi; Hassan Hashemi; Amir Houshang Beheshtnejad
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-09-02       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Intraocular Pressure Calculation in Myopic Patients After Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis.

Authors:  Hazem Helmy; Omar Hashem
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-02-21
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.