Literature DB >> 9535620

Distribution of central corneal thickness and its association with intraocular pressure: The Rotterdam Study.

R C Wolfs1, C C Klaver, J R Vingerling, D E Grobbee, A Hofman, P T de Jong.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To perform a cross-sectional study on the distribution of central corneal thickness and its association with intraocular pressure in an elderly population.
METHODS: We measured central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure in 395 subjects (352 control subjects, 13 patients with ocular hypertension, and 30 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma) aged 55 years or more.
RESULTS: Mean central corneal thickness in the 352 control subjects was 537.4 microm (95% confidence interval [CI], 533.8 to 540.9 microm; range, 427 to 620 microm), with a maximal difference between eyes of 42 microm. There were no differences between sexes and no significant association with age. Linear regression analysis showed an increase of 0.19 mm Hg in intraocular pressure with each 10-microm increase in central corneal thickness (95% CI, 0.09 to 0.28 mm Hg). This association was similar in both eyes and in both sexes. The 13 patients with ocular hypertension had corneas a mean of 16.0 microm thicker (95% CI, -2.6 to +34.6 microm) compared with control subjects (P = .093); the 30 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma had corneas a mean of 21.5 microm thinner (95% CI, 8.8 to 34.1 microm) compared with control subjects (P = .001).
CONCLUSION: Mean central corneal thickness was similar to that found in clinical studies, was slightly higher in patients with ocular hypertension, and was significantly lower in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma. Intraocular pressure was positively related with central corneal thickness. Central corneal thickness may influence the division between normal and increased intraocular pressure at a simple cutoff point of 21 mm Hg.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9535620     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)71125-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  92 in total

1.  Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility in the evaluation of ultrasonic pachymetry measurements of central corneal thickness.

Authors:  S Miglior; E Albe; M Guareschi; G Mandelli; S Gomarasca; N Orzalesi
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Genetic Evidence for Differential Regulation of Corneal Epithelial and Stromal Thickness.

Authors:  Demelza R Koehn; Kacie J Meyer; Michael G Anderson
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 3.  [Glaucoma diagnostics and corneal thickness].

Authors:  J von Eicken; M Kohlhaas; H Höh
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.059

4.  The influence of central corneal thickness and age on intraocular pressure measured by pneumotonometry, non-contact tonometry, the Tono-Pen XL, and Goldmann applanation tonometry.

Authors:  P-A Tonnu; T Ho; T Newson; A El Sheikh; K Sharma; E White; C Bunce; D Garway-Heath
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Changes in corneal thickness and curvature after different excimer laser photorefractive procedures and their impact on intraocular pressure measurements.

Authors:  Helena Svedberg; Enping Chen; Helene Hamberg-Nyström
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-07-08       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 6.  [The risk of glaucoma and corneal thickness].

Authors:  A G Böhm
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.059

7.  Ophthalmic dysfunction in a community-based sample: influence of race/ethnicity.

Authors:  Girardin Jean-Louis; Ferdinand Zizi; Monica Dweck; Dexter McKenzie; Douglass R Lazzaro
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.798

8.  Central corneal thickness in adult Chinese. Association with ocular and general parameters. The Beijing Eye Study.

Authors:  Haitao Zhang; Liang Xu; Changxi Chen; Jost B Jonas
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-01-12       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  Elevated intraocular pressure in patients with acromegaly.

Authors:  Luciano Quaranta; Ivano Riva; Gherardo Mazziotti; Teresa Porcelli; Irene Floriani; Andreas Katsanos; Andrea Giustina; Anastasios G P Konstas
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 3.117

10.  Dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry: a comparative study.

Authors:  Mona Pache; Sonja Wilmsmeyer; Sonja Lautebach; Jens Funk
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-03-09       Impact factor: 3.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.